The aim of this study is to assess emergency medicine physician and advanced practice provider (APP) knowledge and technical skill in performance of a point-of-care ultrasound simulation and just-in-time training pathway to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the ultrasound training program. By performing this study, we hope to create a standardized training model which could potentially facilitate point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical performance and thereby improve patient care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
75
Participants will complete a cardiac POCUS simulation session and a hands-on observed structured clinical skill exam (OSCE) post-training led by ultrasound-trained faculty. Then as part of standard clinical care, advanced practice providers (APPs) will perform POCUS while supervised by emergency medicine (EM) attending physicians. To assess program feasibility and acceptability, participants will complete a pre/post and 6-month post-survey and semi-structured interview, as well as a knowledge and technical skills assessment.
Duke University Health System
Durham, North Carolina, United States
RECRUITINGAim 1: Assess the feasibility of implementing a just-in-time cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical training pathway for advanced practice providers (APPs) using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.
Participants will complete a cardiac POCUS simulation session and a hands-on structured clinical skill exam post-training (OSCE) led by ultrasound-trained faculty. Then as part of standard clinical care, APPs will perform POCUS while supervised by EM attending physicians. The primary outcome assesses program feasibility and acceptability. Participants will complete a pre/post and 6-month post-survey and semi-structured interview. Survey questions are structured based on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) survey tool. This is scored on a Likert scale from 1-5.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 1: Acceptability of the Intervention as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
The AIM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater acceptability.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 1: Appropriateness of the Intervention as measured by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
The IAM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater appropriateness.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 1: Feasibility of the Intervention as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) survey tool
The FIM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater appropriateness.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 1: Feasibility of implementing a just-in-time cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical training pathway for advanced practice providers (APPs) using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.
Using a modified framework analysis approach, a team of 3-4 trained research assistants and the two emergency ultrasound fellows led by an implementation science expert will deductively analyze semi-structured interview content based on RE-AIM constructs with open inductive coding for data that does not fit into the framework. The investigators will perform a preliminary rapid qualitative deductive analysis based on audio recordings and meeting notes applied to the RE-AIM dimensions, to determine scope and saturation. Coding and categorization will be conducted with RE-AIM templated coding sheets and transferred to NVivo.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Educational impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance
Participants will complete a pre-, post-, and 6-month post-training knowledge assessment and technical skill test to assess the educational impact of the cardiac POCUS program, structured using the Ultrasound Competency Assessment Tool (UCAT), which is scored on a Likert scale from 1-5, where a higher score indicates greater competency.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - number of clinical POCUSs performed
To assess the advanced practice provider (APP) training program effectiveness, the investigators will collect pre/post-health record data on the number of clinical POCUS performed in the emergency department pre/post-intervention (from the Butterfly ultrasound archiving system, units in counts/percentages).
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - image quality
To assess APP training program effectiveness, the investigators will collect pre/post-health record data on image quality review scores (determine by two ultrasound experts, Likert scale 1-5, where a higher score indicates greater quality).
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - diagnostic accuracy
The investigators will collect data on diagnostic accuracy as compared to radiology studies (from ultrasound expert review, True Positive, True Negative, False Positive, False Negative, or Technically-limited study)
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - time to initial cardiology consult
The investigators will collect electronic health record data on pre/post-intervention time to initial cardiology consult (both from the Epic electronic health record, units in hours).
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - emergency department length-of-stay
The investigators will collect electronic health record data on pre/post-intervention ED length-of-stay (from the Epic electronic health record, units in hours).
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Impact of the training model on cost-effectiveness
The investigators will collect pre/post-intervention POCUS revenue data for cost-effectiveness (from hospital billing data, units in dollars).
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.