Title: Study of Inectolizumab Combined With Steroid Hormone Adjustment Strategies in Treatment-naive Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disease Objective:This study aims to evaluate the steroid-sparing effect and safety of inebilizumab in treatment-naïve AQP4-IgG seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients, while assessing its impact on EDSS score improvement during acute-phase treatment. The study will further explore treatment-related biomarkers, including dynamic changes in: immunoglobulin levels, lymphocyte subset profiles, serum AQP4-IgG titers, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NFL) levels. Study Design:This is a single-center, randomized, open-label, prospective clinical study planning to enroll 25 treatment-naïve, anti-aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients.
Research Objectives: * To investigate the steroid-sparing effect and safety of inebilizumab in treatment-naïve AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients. * To evaluate the efficacy of early inebilizumab initiation during acute attacks in improving EDSS scores and its safety profile in treatment-naïve AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD patients. Research Background: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare, relapsing autoimmune disease characterized by inflammatory demyelination of the central nervous system, predominantly affecting young to middle-aged women and typically manifesting as optic neuritis and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis, often causing irreversible neurological damage and significant disability. The pathogenesis centers on AQP4-IgG-mediated immune attacks through complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, leading to astrocyte damage and neuroinflammation, with B cells and IL-6 playing key roles in disease progression. While traditional therapies (corticosteroids and immunosuppressants) have limited efficacy and significant side effects, newly approved biologics (inebilizumab, eculizumab, satralizumab) targeting B cells, complement, or IL-6 pathways have shown promising results in reducing relapses. Our preliminary data suggest early inebilizumab initiation during acute attacks (within 7-10 days) may improve neurological function (EDSS scores) while enabling rapid steroid tapering without increasing relapse risk. This study aims to systematically evaluate the feasibility and safety of accelerated steroid reduction during inebilizumab therapy in treatment-naïve AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD patients, while assessing the efficacy of early biologic intervention, with the goal of optimizing treatment strategies, improving patient outcomes, and informing future clinical guidelines. Research Design: This prospective, randomized controlled trial will evaluate the steroid-sparing efficacy and safety profile of inebilizumab in treatment-naïve AQP4-IgG+ neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients. The study specifically aims to: (1) quantify inebilizumab's glucocorticoid dose-reduction potential, (2) assess its safety in acute-phase administration (initiated within 7-10 days of disease onset), and (3) measure treatment impact on disability outcomes (EDSS improvement). By systematically investigating whether early biologic intervention facilitates both rapid steroid tapering and neurological recovery, this research will generate critical evidence to optimize precision therapy for NMOSD patients. Treatment Protocol: Eligible NMOSD patients (n=25) will be randomized into two groups: * Experimental Group(n=12): Inebilizumab on Day 1 and Day 15. Oral steroids (60 mg qod)after second dose, halved every 2 weeks, stopped at Week 12. * Active comparator(n=13): Inebilizumab on Day 1 and Day 15. Oral steroids (60 mg qod) after second dose, halved every 4 weeks, stopped at Week 24. Initial Treatment (Both Groups): Days 1-5 (D1-D5): Methylprednisolone 1.0g IV daily (first infusion day designated as D1);Day 6 (D6): Switch to oral prednisone 60mg daily for 14 days + initiate first inebilizumab 300mg IV infusion ;Day 20 (D20): Second inebilizumab 300mg IV (15 days after first dose);Week 24: Third inebilizumab 300mg IV Steroid Tapering Schedules: \- Rapid-Taper Group: D20: Prednisone reduced to 60mg every other day (EOD) D34 (after 2 weeks): Reduce to 30mg EOD D48 (after 2 weeks): Reduce to 15mg EOD D62 (after 2 weeks): Reduce to 10mg EOD D76 (after 2 weeks): Reduce to 5mg EOD D90 (Week 12): Discontinue steroids \- Standard-Taper Group: D20-D34: Continue prednisone 60mg daily for 4 weeks D34: Reduce to 60mg EOD D62 (after 4 weeks): Reduce to 30mg EOD D90 (after 4 weeks): Reduce to 15mg EOD D118 (after 4 weeks): Reduce to 10mg EOD D146 (after 4 weeks): Reduce to 5mg EOD D174 (Week 24): Discontinue steroids Study Visits and Assessments: * Five scheduled visit timepoints Baseline (Visit 1, Week 0): First inebilizumab administration Visit 2 (Week 2) Visit 3 (Week 4) Visit 4 (Week 12) Visit 5 (Week 24) * Visit Procedures Visit 1:Laboratory tests (CBC, biochemistry, IgA/IgM/IgG levels, lymphocyte subsets)、MRI (brain/orbital/spinal)、Serum markers (AQP4-IgG, NFL, GFAP)、Clinical assessments (EDSS, Hauser Ambulation Index) Visit 2:Adverse event assessment Laboratory tests (CBC, biochemistry, IgA/IgM/IgG, lymphocyte subsets)、Clinical assessments Visit 3:Adverse event assessment、Clinical assessments Visit 4:Adverse event assessment Laboratory tests (CBC, biochemistry, IgA/IgM/IgG, lymphocyte subsets, serum markers)、Clinical assessments Visit 5:Full repeat of Visit 1 assessments
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
25
Drug 1: Inebilizumab Generic Name: Inebilizumab Formulation: Injection (Intravenous) Dose: 300 mg Frequency:Day 6 (Week 0): First dose ;Day 20 (Week 2): Second dose ;Week 24: Third dose Route: Intravenous infusion Drug 2: Prednisone Generic Name: Prednisone Formulation: Tablet (Oral) Dose \& Tapering:Day 6-19: 60 mg daily;Day 20: 60 mg every other day (EOD) ;Day 34: 30 mg EOD → Day 48: 15 mg EOD → Day 62: 10 mg EOD → Day 76: 5 mg EOD → Day 90: Discontinue Route: Oral
Drug 1: Inebilizumab Generic Name: Inebilizumab Formulation: Injection (Intravenous) Dose: 300 mg Frequency:Day 6 (Week 0): First dose ;Day 20 (Week 2): Second dose ;Week 24: Third dose Route: Intravenous infusion Drug 2: Prednisone Generic Name: Prednisone Formulation: Tablet (Oral) Dose \& Tapering:Day 6-34: 60 mg daily;Day 34: 60 mg EOD → Day 62: 30 mg EOD → Day 90: 15 mg EOD → Day 118: 10 mg EOD → Day 146: 5 mg EOD → Day 174:Discontinue; Route: Oral
The change in the average daily dose of corticosteroids between the two groups during the follow-up period compared to randomization (i.e., baseline
Record the corticosteroid dose for patients at randomization (baseline) and during the follow-up period
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24
Time to first clinical relapse
Accurately document the time of symptom onset in patients.
Time frame: From the date of randomization (baseline) to the date of first documented clinical relapse (as defined by protocol criteria), assessed up to 24 weeks.
The change in EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale) score from.
Before patients enter the study (i.e., at randomization) and at each follow-up time point during the study period, the disability status of patients is assessed by a trained neurologist or study nurse, and the EDSS scores at baseline and follow-up time points are recorded.
Time frame: Baseline,Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24
The incidence, severity, and outcomes of adverse events in each group of patients
Record the occurrence, severity, and outcomes of adverse events in patients at baseline and follow-up time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24
Area Under the Dose-Time Curve of Corticosteroids (AUDTC)
Record the corticosteroid dose for patients at Week 24. Calculate the total area under the dose-time curve (AUDTC) by dividing the dose-time curve into multiple trapezoids, calculating the area of each trapezoid, and then summing these areas.
Time frame: Week 24
The change in the Hauser Walking Index from baseline for each group of patients.
At baseline and follow-up time points, patients are required to walk 25 feet (approximately 8 meters) on a flat surface, and the time taken is recorded. The score is then determined according to the time taken to walk this distance and whether any assistive devices are used, in accordance with the scoring criteria.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.