The study aims to determine which method of vagal ganglia ablation is most effective in preventing recurrences of reflex asystole syncope. Currently, some centers perform ablation only in the right atrium, others in both atria (biatrial). There are no comparative studies between the two procedures
Cardioneuroablation (CNA) therapy for reflex asystole syncope is becoming increasingly popular. The best method of CNA is debated, with no studies comparing the syncopal recurrence rates of right atrium ablation versus bi-atrial ablation. Evaluating the clinical efficacy of CNA is challenging due to symptom variability, intermittent presentation, complex pathophysiology, and different treatment options. The difficulty of obtaining precise follow-up data in patients with intermittent symptoms is well known. With ILR, more objective tracking can be achieved. The aim of the study is to verify the efficacy of CNA on the reduction of the asystole reflex documented by continuous monitoring by ILR in patients undergoing right atrial ablation compared to bi-atrial ablation
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
50
Eligible patients receive the implantation of a LuxDx® ILR and are monitored for one month by means of the Latitude Clarity data management system of the device. The usual practice of the centres is unchanged. According to their usual practice, the centre is assigned to right atrial ablation. The patients receive a right atrial procedure accordingly. As per pragmatic design, cross-over are permitted according to investigator judgment. The ablation methods and techniques are left to investigator's decision. They are reported in the CRF.
Eligible patients receive the implantation of a LuxDx® ILR and are monitored for one month by means of the Latitude Clarity data management system of the device. The usual practice of the centres is unchanged. According to their usual practice, the centre is assigned to bi-atrial ablation. The patients receive a bi-atrial procedure accordingly. As per pragmatic design, cross-over are permitted according to investigator judgment. The ablation methods and techniques are left to investigator's decision. They are reported in the CRF.
IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano
Milan, Italy
Mounthly frequency of asystolic episodes >3 sec
Frequency of asystolic episodes \>3 sec per month detected through ILR monitoring before and after ablation.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Freedom from ablation-related complications
Freedom from ablation-related complications and from pacemaker implantation during the follow-up period;
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Burden of syncopal episodes
Comparison betwen the mounthly burden of syncopal episodes before and after ablation;
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV)
Pattern of heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) detected by ILR before andafter ablation.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time to first asystolic and syncope recurrence
Tme to first asystolic pause \>3 sec e and to first syncope recurrence
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.