People living in high TB burden communities who undergo active case finding for TB may have chest X-ray changes suggestive of TB but their sputum test can be negative for the TB bacteria or they are unable to provide a sputum sample. This means they have bacteriologically unconfirmed TB. These individuals often have minimal or no symptoms and face uncertainty in clinical management-either receiving full 24-weeks TB treatment or often being discharged without treatment, risking loss to follow-up. The RADIO-TB trial aims to address the following main questions in relation to people with bacteriologically unconfirmed TB. 1. What is the risk of progression if treatment is not immediately started but there is close and careful follow-up over 78 weeks? 2. If treatment is started immediately what is the shortest duration of TB treatment that is as effective as the standard 24-week TB treatment? 3. Are there better tests to confirm TB than the current routinely used, sputum-based tests? 4. What is the cost effectiveness of different treatment strategies and what might the impact on transmission be within communities? Participants in the trial will be randomized into six groups: five receiving immediate standard TB treatment of varying durations (8 to 24 weeks), and one receiving deferred treatment with close monitoring. Deferred treatment will be initiated only if clinical deterioration occurs or TB is later confirmed. Participants will be closely followed for 78 weeks with at least 11 clinic visits.
Increasingly, countries are adopting community-based chest X-ray (CXR) screening strategies to identify people with TB at an early stage, often before they have symptoms. However, a significant proportion of individuals with radiographic abnormalities suggestive of TB are not bacteriologically confirmed due to limitations in sputum-based diagnostics or inability to produce sputum. These individuals are often diagnosed with "bacteriologically unconfirmed TB," and there is currently no consensus on how best to manage them. The RADIO-TB trial is a multi-country, multi-arm, phase 3 clinical trial designed to address this critical evidence gap. The trial aims to determine the optimal treatment duration for individuals with radiographic evidence of TB who do not have bacteriological confirmation and are identified through active case finding (ACF) using CXR and computer-aided detection (CAD) software. The study is being conducted in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Pakistan. Recruitment for the trial will be conducted alongside existing programatic CXR-based TB ACF activity taking place in these countries. RADIO-TB uses a pragmatic, open-label, randomized design with six parallel arms. Participants are randomized to one of the following 6 arms in a ratio 1:1:1:1:1:2. Arm A. Immediate start of 24 weeks (approx. 6 months) TB treatment comprised of 8 weeks (approx. 2 months) isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol (2HRZE) followed by 16 weeks (approx. 4 months) of isoniazid and rifampicin (4HR) - 2HRZE/4HR (control-A). Arm B. Immediate start of 20 weeks (approx. 5 months) TB treatment - 2HRZE/3HR. Arm C. Immediate start of 16 weeks (approx. 4 months) TB treatment - 2HRZE/2HR. Arm D. Immediate start of 12 weeks (approx. 3 months) TB treatment - 2HRZE/1HR. Arm E. Immediate start of 8 weeks (approx. 2 months) TB treatment - 2HRZE. Arm F. No initial treatment, deferred if progression - if during close follow-up there is bacteriological confirmation and/or clinical/radiological progression, to start 24 weeks (approx. 6 months) TB treatment - 2HRZE/4HR (control-F). The trial employs a Response Over Continuous Intervention (ROCI) design, which allows for the estimation and modelling of the duration-response curve and a more precise and efficient identification of the shortest non-inferior treatment duration compared to the standard 24-week regimen. The study hypothesis is that those with radiographically apparent, bacteriologically unconfirmed TB identified through ACF, immediate TB treatment with duration that is 8 weeks or longer, but less than 24 weeks, will be: (A) Non-inferior to treatment of 24 weeks duration (Arm A) at a 5% non-inferiority margin and (B) Superior to no initial treatment (Arm F) to prevent unfavourable TB outcomes. The trial will enrol 784 participants aged 16 years and older who have undergone CXR-based TB ACF locally and found to have a CAD score above a locally defined threshold for TB investigation and either sputum negative by a WHO-approved rapid molecular test for TB or are unable to produce sputum. Key exclusion criteria are: a history of prior pulmonary TB, evidence of extra-pulmonary TB, clinical indication for immediate full-course treatment or an alternative cause for the CXR abnormalities more likely than TB. People who are HIV-infected will be eligible if their CD4 count is ≥200/mm3 and they on established on anti-retroviral therapy (ART). The CAD software used for screening will be those used locally in the existing ACF programmes according to international recommendation and national approvals. At the end of the study CXR will be re-analysed for all available CAD software to aid generalisability of findings. All participants will undergo comprehensive baseline assessments, including clinical evaluation, induced sputum culture, blood and respiratory sampling for novel diagnostics. They are followed for 78 weeks with scheduled clinical evaluations, repeat chest X-ray, repeat microbiological testing, and quality-of-life assessments. Where necessary participants will be investigated for conditions other than TB. The primary outcome measure for the trial is the proportion with unfavourable outcomes defined as requiring initiation of TB treatment after the week 0 visit for either bacteriologically confirmed TB or clinical/radiological progression without bacteriological confirmation. The trial also evaluates safety, tolerability of treatment; the impact on lung function, chest X-ray changes and quality of life; the frequency and timing of diagnoses other than TB; and the development of drug resistance. In addition, the study includes ancillary components to (1) assess the cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies, (2) model the impact of different strategies on TB transmission and (3) evaluate novel diagnostic tools that may improve the early identification and confirmation of TB. The RADIO-TB trial is sponsored by University College London (UCL) and funded by the Wellcome Trust. It is coordinated by the UCL Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (ICTM) in collaboration with national TB programs, academic institutions, and community partners in the participating countries. The trial incorporates robust patient and public involvement (PPI) mechanisms to ensure that the research is aligned with community priorities and that findings are disseminated in accessible and impactful ways. By generating high-quality evidence on the optimal management of bacteriologically unconfirmed TB, the RADIO-TB trial aims to inform national and international TB treatment guidelines. The results will support more individualised and evidence-based approaches to TB care, improve patient outcomes, and contribute to global efforts to end the TB epidemic.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
784
H, weight based, 150-375mg
R, weight based, 300-750mg
Z, weight based, 800-2000mg
E weight based, 550-1375mg
National University of Medical Sciences
Islamabad, Pakistan
Clinical HIV Research Unit, Wits Health Consortium
Johannesburg, South Africa
The Aurum Institute
Johannesburg, South Africa
Bulawayo City Health
Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
Proportion of participants with an unfavourable TB outcome
Unfavourable outcome = requiring initiation of TB treatment after the week 0 visit for either bacteriologically confirmed TB or clinical/radiological progression without bacteriological confirmation
Time frame: Over 78 weeks post-randomisation
Time to (re-)treatment
Time frame: Over 78 weeks post-randomisation
Proportion of participants with bacteriological confirmation for Mtb
Time frame: Over 78 weeks post-randomisation
Proportion of participants initiated on TB treatment for symptomatic TB
Time frame: Over 78 weeks post-randomisation
Computer Aided Detection (CAD) software score (TB related)
Higher score indicates a higher probability of TB related abnormality.
Time frame: At weeks 8, 36 and 72
Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)
Lung function test determined by spirometry
Time frame: At 72 weeks
Forced vital capacity (FVC)
Lung function test determined by spirometry
Time frame: At 72 weeks
FEV1/FVC ratio
Lung function test determined by spirometry
Time frame: At 72 weeks
Total time on TB treatment
Time frame: Over 78 weeks
Number Needed to Treat to prevent unfavourable outcome
Time frame: Over 78 weeks
All-cause mortality
Time frame: Over 78 weeks
Proportion of participants experiencing Grade 2/3/4 Adverse Events (AE) (and the subset which are treatment emergent) according to DAIDS criteria
Time frame: Over 24 and 78 weeks
Proportion of participants experiencing Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: Over 24 and 78 weeks
Proportion of participants experiencing Hepatotoxicity AE of Special Interest
Time frame: Over 24 and 78 weeks
Proportion of participants permanently stopping treatment due to an AE of any grade (AESI)
Time frame: Over 78 weeks
Proportion of participants with final diagnosis of baseline CXR abnormality as non-TB
Time frame: Over 78 weeks
Time to non-TB diagnosis
Time frame: Over 78 weeks
Proportion who develop isoniazid and/or rifampicin resistant TB
Time frame: Over 78 weeks
EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale score
Scaled - 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health)
Time frame: Over 72 weeks
Short Form 36 (SF-36) score
36 item questionnaire evaluating 8 health domains. Domains are scored 0 (worse health) to 100 (better health).
Time frame: At weeks 0, 8, 16, 24, 48, 72
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) score
8 item questionnaire. Individual question scores are summed to provide a total score ranging from 0 to 40. A higher score indicates a greater impact of lung condition on their health and daily life.
Time frame: At 72 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.