This study looks at how well the MyVeo surgical visualization headset works during routine surgeries. MyVeo is a wearable device that helps surgeons see the surgical area in high detail, including blood flow and tissue fluorescence, without needing to look through a traditional microscope. The study will involve patients undergoing brain, spine, ENT, or reconstructive surgery, where MyVeo is used as part of the standard care. Surgeons will rate the image quality, comfort, and safety of using MyVeo. The goal is to confirm that MyVeo provides clear images and supports safe and effective surgery. No extra procedures or risks are added for patients.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
32
MyVeo is an all-in-one surgical visualization headset used with compatible surgical microscopes (ARveo 8/ARveo 8x) and other medical imaging systems. It is a digital accessory to an operating surgical microscope that enables the visualization of the surgical field through a visualization headset including: * Display of surgical field illuminated and magnified by the surgical microscope (White Light). * Display of fluorescence of fluorophores within the indicated excitation and emission ranges, as defined by the respective filters (accessories to the compatible surgical microscopes ARveo 8x such as GLOW400 and GLOW800).
Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol
Barcelona, Spain
University Hospital Basel
Basel, Switzerland
White Light and Fluorescence image quality
Image quality will be assessed during surgery using a structured questionnaire completed by the operating surgeon. The evaluation includes white light and fluorescence imaging (GLOW400 and GLOW800) in both main surgeon (3D) and assistant (2D) modes. The following parameters will be rated: Contrast Color fidelity Stereoscopic/3D impression (main surgeon mode only) Resolution Latency (main surgeon mode only) Measurement Tool: MyVeo PMCF Study Data Collection Form - Questionnaire A and B Scale Range: 5-point Likert scale: 1. = Not available 2. = Insufficient 3. = Sufficient 4. = Very good 5. = Excellent Interpretation of Scores: Scores of 3 or higher are considered acceptable. Ratings below 3 indicate performance concerns. The outcome will be analyzed using binary coding (Pass = 3-5; Fail = 1-2).
Time frame: Periprocedural
The secondary objective will be assessed by evaluating the continued safety of the device by monitoring and analyzing adverse events, device-related complications.
Safety and User Experience will be evaluated using Questionnaire, completed postoperatively by the surgical team. It captures: Dizziness due to 3D visualization Surgical delays or interruptions Injuries to patient or user Breach of sterility Tissue burns Responses are binary for Safety: 1. = Yes (event occurred) 2. = No (event did not occur) Lower scores (2 = No) indicate better safety outcomes. The outcome is acceptable if no safety events are reported. User Experience It captures: 1. ergonomics and comfort 2. adjustability 3. workflow 4. confidence in terms of decision -making Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 1. = Not available 2. = Insufficient 3. = Sufficient 4. = Very good 5. = Excellent Higher scores indicate better performance. The outcome is considered acceptable if all ratings are ≥3 (Sufficient or bett
Time frame: Postprocedural
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.