This phase III trial compares the effect of immunotherapy (IO) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to IO alone in treating patients with liver cancer (hepatocellular cancer) that may have spread from where it first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced). The usual approach is treatment with IO-based drug combinations, such as atezolizumab and bevacizumab, durvalumab and tremelimumab, or ipilimumab and nivolumab. IO with monoclonal antibodies, such as durvalumab, tremelimumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab and ipilimumab, may help the body's immune system attack the tumor, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Bevacizumab is in a class of medications called antiangiogenic agents. It works by stopping the formation of blood vessels that bring oxygen and nutrients to tumor. This may slow the growth and spread of tumor cells. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. SBRT is a type of external radiation therapy that uses special equipment to position a patient and precisely deliver radiation to tumors in the body (except the brain). The total dose of radiation is divided into smaller doses given over several days. This type of radiation therapy helps spare normal tissue. Giving IO with SBRT may be more effective than IO alone in helping patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer live longer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine if liver SBRT in combination with IO-based systemic therapy improves survival compared to IO-based systemic therapy alone, in patients with hepatocellular cancer with macrovascular invasion. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate and compare progression-free survival between treatment arms. II. To evaluate and compare objective response rate between treatment arms. III. To evaluate and compare vascular recanalization between treatment arms. IV. To evaluate and compare biochemical decline in alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) between treatment arms. V. To evaluate and compare toxicity within and between treatment arms. VI. To evaluate and compare liver decompensation per Child Pugh score between treatment arms. VII. To evaluate and compare liver decompensation per modified albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) (mALBI) score between treatment arms. HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE (HRQOL) OBJECTIVES: I. Primary: To compare Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) total score at 6 months between the treatment arms. II. Secondary: To evaluate and compare quality-adjusted survival using European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) between treatment arms. (Will be done if the overall survival primary endpoint is met and/or if EQ-5D significantly differs between treatment arms.) III. Exploratory: To evaluate FACT-Hep total scores over time between the treatment arms. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Biospecimen collection for future correlative analyses. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM 1: Patients receive 1 of 3 IO-based systemic treatments per physician's decision. TREATMENT A: Patients receive atezolizumab and bevacizumab intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. TREATMENT B: Patients receive tremelimumab IV once and durvalumab IV every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. TREATMENT C: Patients receive nivolumab and ipilimumab IV every 3 weeks for up to 4 doses followed by nivolumab IV every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM 2: Patients receive 1 of 3 IO-based systemic treatments per physician's decision. TREATMENT A: Patients undergo liver SBRT once daily (QD), once every other day (QOD), or twice weekly for 5 fractions over up to 3 weeks. Patients also receive atezolizumab and bevacizumab IV every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. TREATMENT B: Patients undergo liver SBRT QD, QOD, or twice weekly for 5 fractions over up to 3 weeks. Patients also receive tremelimumab IV once and durvalumab IV every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. TREATMENT C: Patients undergo liver SBRT QD, QOD, or twice weekly for 5 fractions over up to 3 weeks. Patients also receive nivolumab and ipilimumab IV every 3 weeks for up to 4 doses followed by nivolumab IV every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection, chest computed tomography (CT) and CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the study and may also undergo positron emission tomography (PET)/CT prior to registration. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years then yearly.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
226
Given IV
Given IV
Undergo blood sample collection
Undergo CT and PET/CT
Given IV
Given IV
Undergo MRI
Given IV
Undergo PET/CT
Ancillary studies
Undergo liver SBRT
Given IV
Alta Bates Summit Medical Center-Herrick Campus
Berkeley, California, United States
RECRUITINGSutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Cameron Park
Cameron Park, California, United States
RECRUITINGPalo Alto Medical Foundation-Fremont
Fremont, California, United States
RECRUITINGUCI Health - Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Ambulatory Care
Irvine, California, United States
Overall survival (OS)
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (Kaplan 1958). The distributions of the OS estimates between the two arms will be compared using a log-rank test. The Cox regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, including, but not limited to stratification factors, which may be associated with OS. The primary analysis will happen after at least 150 OS events (deaths) have occurred and will be tested with a 1-sided significance level of 0.022 (level based on not having stopped at either of the 2 planned interim analyses).
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death or last follow-up, assessed up to 5 years
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Defined as local progression, distant failure, or death due to any cause. PFS will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (Kaplan 1958) and estimates between treatment arms will be compared using the log-rank test (Mantel 1966). The Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with PFS (Cox 1972).
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first PFS failure or last follow-up for patients without a reported PFS event, assessed up to 5 years
Objective response rate (ORR)
Defined as having a complete or partial response. ORR will be compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test. Duration of response will also be reported.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Vascular recanalization (VR)
Defined as having a complete or partial vascular thrombosis response. The VR proportion for each treatment arm will be determined and compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test. Time to best VR response before progression and duration of VR response will be reported, but no statistical testing will be done.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Short-term toxicity
Defined as grade ≥ 4 adverse events (AEs). Will be compared between the treatment arms using a Z-test.
Time frame: Up to 90 days from randomization
Selected long-term treatment-related toxicity
Defined as grade ≥ 4 hepatobiliary or gastrointestinal AEs and any grade 5 AE definitely related to protocol treatment. The percentage of patients with the above-specified treatment related AEs will be compared between the treatment arms using a Z-test.
Time frame: Up to 18 months after randomization
Biochemical decline in alpha-fetoprotein (BD-AFP)
Failure is defined as a ≥ 20% decrease in AFP from baseline. The BD-AFP proportion for each treatment arm will be determined and compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Liver decompensation rate per Child Pugh score (LDR-CP)
Failure for this endpoint is the first occurrence of a worsening of Child Pugh score by 2 or more. The LDR-CP proportion for each treatment arm will be determined and compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Liver decompensation rate per modified albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score (LDR-mALBI)
Failure for this endpoint is the first occurrence of a decrease in grade. The LDR-mALBI proportion for each treatment arm will be determined and compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Palo Alto Medical Foundation-Camino Division
Mountain View, California, United States
RECRUITINGUC Irvine Health/Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Orange, California, United States
RECRUITINGPalo Alto Medical Foundation Health Care
Palo Alto, California, United States
RECRUITINGSutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Roseville
Roseville, California, United States
RECRUITINGSutter Roseville Medical Center
Roseville, California, United States
RECRUITINGSutter Medical Center Sacramento
Sacramento, California, United States
RECRUITING...and 97 more locations