The goal of this adapted intervention study is to assess how community-led group discussions about health-related topics may alter beliefs and intentions regarding healthcare recommendations, such as COVID-19 testing and vaccination.
Eligible participants were randomized to intervention or control group. Intervention group participants met virtually with other community member participants in small discussion groups once a week for 75 minutes over the course of 14 weeks. The online discussion groups were led by peer mentor facilitators and supported by a research team member. Discussion topics included current events and other health related topics. Control group participants did not meet in weekly discussion groups. At approximately the 0 weeks, 14 weeks, and 18 weeks time points, all participants answered online surveys about health related topics. At the 14 weeks and 18 weeks time points, all participants were asked to self-administer a COVID-19 test that investigators provide.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
49
Participants engage in weekly community-led small group discussions about health related topics
Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Institute at Old Dominion University
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Openness to COVID-19 Testing
The COVID-19 Testing Openness Questionnaire is an 7-item self-report measure designed to assess participants' openness to getting tested for COVID-19. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, from 1 "Strongly Disagree" to 5 "Strongly Agree," with the sum of scores ranging from 7 to 35. Higher scores indicate greater openness to COVID-19 testing.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 14 weeks, 18 weeks
COVID-19 Testing Efficacy
The COVID-19 Testing Efficacy Scale is a 6-item self-report measure that will assess participants' perceived self- and response-efficacy related to COVID-19 testing. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 "Strongly Disagree" to 5 "Strongly Agree," with the sum of scores ranging between 6 and 30. Higher scores indicate greater efficacy.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 14 weeks, 18 weeks
COVID-19 Trust
Two items assessing (1) trust in the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine, and (2) trust in the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine were used to assess participants' trust relating to COVID-19. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater trust.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 14 weeks, 18 weeks
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy
Vaccine Hesitancy was assessed by an item that asked, "Overall, how hesitant about the COVID-19 vaccine would you consider yourself to be?." This question was adapted from the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey. The item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from "1 - not at all hesitant" to "5 = very hesitant" with higher scores indicating greater hesitancy.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 14 weeks, 18 weeks
Social Connectedness
The Social Connectedness Scale Revised is a 20-item scale that measures a participant's feeling of connection with other people and their community. Each item is rated on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 "Strongly Disagree" to 6 "Strongly Agree," with the sum of scores ranging between 20 and 120. Higher scores indicate greater connectedness.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 14 weeks, 18 weeks
Health Literacy
The Health Literacy Scale (HLS-14) for Adults is a 14-item scale adapted for use in the US that measures an individual's ability to understand, access, and apply health-related information. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 "Strongly Disagree" to 5 "Strongly Agree," with the sum of scores ranging between 14 and 70. Higher scores indicate greater health literacy.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 14 weeks, 18 weeks