This study aims to evaluate the effects of a school-based nutrition education program and the implementation of a school dietitian model on primary school students in Mardin, Türkiye. A total of 67 fourth-grade students were randomized into intervention (n=32) and control (n=35) groups. The intervention group received an eight-week classroom-based nutrition education program, while their parents received four weeks of parent-focused education. Outcomes were measured using the Nutrition Knowledge Test, Nutrition Attitude Scale, Nutrition Behavior Scale, Child Physical Activity Questionnaire, and anthropometric assessments including weight, height, BMI, and waist circumference. The study seeks to determine whether dietitian-led school-based nutrition education can improve children's nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours, as well as influence anthropometric measures. Findings from this trial are expected to inform future strategies for integrating school dietitians and structured nutrition education into primary schools in Türkiye.
Childhood obesity and malnutrition are urgent public health challenges in Türkiye, particularly in regions with limited access to structured health promotion programmes. Schools represent an appropriate setting for preventive strategies as they provide consistent opportunities for health education and behaviour reinforcement. Study Design and Randomisation This study was designed as a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) conducted in a public primary school in Mardin, Türkiye. A total of 70 fourth-grade students were recruited and randomly allocated into intervention and control groups using a simple randomisation procedure performed by an independent researcher. Allocation was concealed until group assignments were finalised. Intervention The intervention group participated in an eight-week school-based nutrition education programme, led by a registered dietitian, with one session delivered per week during school hours. Each session lasted approximately 40 minutes and included structured modules on food groups, balanced diet, healthy snacking, and the risks of processed foods. Interactive teaching methods such as educational games, puzzles, and visual aids were applied to increase engagement. In parallel, parents of the intervention group students attended a four-week supplementary programme delivered in evening sessions, covering home-based nutrition practices and strategies for supporting healthy child eating behaviours. The control group continued routine school activities during the study period. To ensure equity, they were provided with an abridged version of the nutrition education materials after study completion. Data Collection Procedures Measurements were performed at three time points: baseline (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and two months post-intervention (T2). Trained assessors, blinded to group allocation, collected data following standardised protocols. Instruments used included: * Nutrition Knowledge Test (NKT) * Nutrition Attitude Scale (NAS) * Nutrition Behaviour Scale (NBS) * Child Physical Activity Questionnaire (CPAQ) Anthropometric data (height, weight, waist circumference, and BMI) were measured using calibrated equipment under uniform conditions. Outcomes and Analysis Primary outcomes included changes in nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours, as well as physical activity levels. Secondary outcomes focused on anthropometric indicators and dietary habits. Data were analysed using intention-to-treat principles. Continuous variables were evaluated with repeated measures ANOVA to detect changes across the three assessment points, while categorical variables were tested with chi-square statistics. A p-value \<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Ethical and Quality Considerations Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board, and written informed consent was secured from parents alongside child assent. Confidentiality was maintained by anonymising data, and all educational materials were standardised to ensure consistency in intervention delivery. Significance By providing a structured description of the intervention design and evaluation process, this study aims to generate evidence for the effectiveness of integrating school dietitians into the Turkish primary education system. The results will inform national strategies targeting childhood obesity prevention and promote sustainable health policies.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
67
The intervention consisted of an eight-week, school-based nutrition education programme delivered to fourth-grade students by a school dietitian. Sessions were conducted once per week and included interactive lectures, games, and educational activities focusing on healthy eating, food groups, balanced meals, and the risks of processed food consumption. In addition, parents of students in the intervention group received a four-week educational programme on child nutrition, meal planning, and healthy lifestyle practices.
Mardin Artuklu University
Mardin, Artuklu, Turkey (Türkiye)
Nutrition Knowledge Score
In order to evaluate the nutritional behaviours, knowledge level and attitudes of the students, questions prepared by making use of the literature and in parallel with the nutrition education given were used. In the evaluation, +1 point was given for each correct answer, 0 points for each incorrect answer, and the total score was reported. Higher scores obtained from the test indicate higher nutritional knowledge.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (8 weeks), and 2-month follow-up.
Nutrition Attitude Score
The scale consists of exercise, nutrition, smoking and stress control sub-dimensions. In this study, only the 'nutrition' sub-dimension was used. The overall internal consistency coefficient of the scale was reported as 0.79 and the internal consistency coefficient of the nutrition subscale was reported as 0.68. The nutrition sub-dimension assesses the child's attitude towards behaviours to reduce fat intake, increase healthy food consumption and diets that support heart health. Scale items are scored between 1 (strongly disagree) and 4 (strongly agree) and the total score ranges from 4 to 16. The high scores obtained reflect favourable nutritional attitudes.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (8 weeks), and 2-month follow-up.
Nutrition Behaviour Score
It was developed to determine children's food preferences. It consists of 14 items featuring images of healthy and unhealthy foods. On the scale, each unhealthy food choice is assigned -1 point, each healthy food choice is assigned +1 point, and the total score ranges from -14 to +14. High scores indicate healthy eating habits.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (8 weeks), and 2-month follow-up.
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Change in BMI (kg/m²) calculated from measured height and weight of participants. This will assess the effect of the nutrition education programme on growth and weight status.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (8 weeks), and 2-month follow-up.
Waist Circumference
Change in waist circumference (cm) measured using a standard anthropometric tape at the midpoint between the lower rib and iliac crest. This will evaluate central adiposity changes following the intervention.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (8 weeks), and 2-month follow-up.
Physical Activity Score
The questionnaire was used to determine the physical activity levels of the students. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient as 0.86. CPAQ was developed to assess the physical activity levels of children aged 8-14 years. The form is filled in by the child. The form consists of 10 questions and the physical activity status of the child in the last seven days is questioned with the form. Except for the question questioning the disease status of the questionnaire, each item is evaluated as 5 points and an activity score between 1-5 is found. '1' indicates low physical activity and '5' indicates high physical activity.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (8 weeks), and 2-month follow-up.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.