This study consists of random patient selection and allocating them in 3 different groups. After being fit to be included according to the protocol's criteria and signing an informed consent, patients will be distributed after performing a dental surgery known as gingivectomy. Gingivectomy has been classified as the gold standard treatment option for the control of gingival enlargement. Wound recovery after gingivectomy and gingivoplasty occurs by secondary intention healing, thus post-surgical wounds can be strongly associated with discomfort, pain and delayed healing. For that reason, the first group will consist of 13 patients who will be exposed to hyaluronic acid gel or gingigel and photobiomodulation therapy to see if there is significant results in the post-operative healing phase. The second group will also consist of 13 patients who will undergo only photobiomodulation therapy. While the third group will have no clinical supportive care besides follow-up and analgesics upon request. All the values will be determined by using scores such as Visual analogue scale for pain, Landry's index for healing assessment and oral health quality of life, which consists of 14 questions to asses the enhancement of everyday problems affected by dental situations. Each case will be followed-up for 3 months post-operative.
The study group consisted of thirty-nine surgical gingivectomy wound sites on patients presenting with gingival hypertrophy on maxillary or mandibular anterior region. Groups will be randomly and equally divided into three groups, Group-A (Test Group 1): Surgical sites after gingivectomy procedures will be irradiated with diode laser (Photobiomodulation therapy) at (940 nm, 0.21 W) with a fiber tip diameter of 400μm for 30 seconds, then covered with HA Gel. Group-B (Test Group 2): Surgical sites will be irradiated with diode laser only at (940 nm, 0.21 W). Group-C (Control Group): No post-surgical therapy will be performed. Wound healing was assessed by implementing Landry, Turnbull and Howley Healing index, while pain perception was objectively evaluated by the patients using the visual analog scale (VAS). To further evaluate the patient's quality of life, Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) records will be obtained before and after gingivectomy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
38
The use of Gingigel or 0.2% hyaluronic gel is expected to enhance healing and decrease discomfort in the post-operative period. It exhibits viscoelastic characteristic which serves as osteo-conductive, anti-edematous, antifungal and bacteriostatic effects.
PBMT has markedly been effective in reducing pain, inflammation, edema and postoperative discomfort. It is said to be a natural and effective alternative approach to minimize medicaments prescription such as analgesics, anti-inflammatory or antibiotic drugs. With that said, negative outcomes such as drug side effects, bacterial resistance and post-operative complications can be prevented, thus increasing the success of medical care and assuring a better quality of life
Beirut Arab University
Beirut, Lebanon
Landry's healing index
to asses the wound healing progress post-surgically in the 3 groups and see how photobiomodulation therapy and the application of hyaluronic acid can enhance the post-operative period. Five variables are assessed: tissue color, bleeding on palpation, the presence of granulation tissue, the incision margin and suppuration. It ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor healing and 5 indicating excellent healing
Time frame: Wound healing assessed by implementing Landry, Turnbull and Howley Healing index on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st day, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months after the post-surgical procedure.
Visual analogue scale
to asses the subjected level of pain by the patient throughout the healing process with a minimum score of 0 meaning no pain (best) and a maximum score of 10 meaning severe pain (worse)
Time frame: Pain perception will be evaluated by using the visual analog scale on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st day and 1 month of periodic follow-up
Oral health impact profile 14 questions
to asses the quality of life of patients prior the surgery due to their condition to asses the enhancement of the patient's condition after the surgery and asses how the post-operative interventions bettered their post-operative experience. To asses the condition you sum the numerical values of each of the 14 items with a 5-point likert scale 0= never 1= hardly ever 2= ocassionally 3=fairly often 4= very often then you sum the scores of all 14 question to get a total score from 0-56. closer to 56 = greater negative impact of oral health problems on the quality of life closer to 0 =better oral-health related quality of life
Time frame: pre-operative post-operative - on the 7th day - on the 14th day
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.