The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if sub-threshold dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation provides pain relief beyond placebo in adults with chronic neuropathic pain who already have an implanted DRG stimulator. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does sub-threshold DRG stimulation reduce daily pain intensity compared with sham stimulation? * How does sub-threshold stimulation affect sleep, mood, and daily activity? Researchers will compare active sub-threshold DRG stimulation to sham (device switched off) to see if stimulation has a genuine effect on pain and wellbeing. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to receive either active sub-threshold DRG stimulation or sham stimulation for 5 days, followed by the opposite condition for another 5 days. * Complete short electronic diaries twice daily about their pain, sleep, mood, and activity. * Attend study visits for safety checks and assessments.
Neuropathic pain is a chronic condition that affects 6-10% of adults and is often resistant to conventional drug therapy. The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) has emerged as an important therapeutic target, as abnormal firing in DRG neurons contributes to peripheral and central sensitization. DRG stimulation (DRGS) delivers mild electrical pulses through implanted leads placed near the DRG. Compared with traditional spinal cord stimulation, DRGS provides highly targeted pain relief with fewer unwanted sensations. Over the past decade, DRGS has become an established treatment for conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), causalgia, chronic low back pain, and post-surgical neuropathic pain. Modern programming favors sub-threshold settings, in which stimulation is delivered below the level that causes tingling sensations (paresthesias). Although widely adopted, the specific contribution of sub-threshold stimulation has never been confirmed in a sham-controlled trial. This study is the first randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to directly evaluate whether sub-threshold DRG stimulation provides pain relief beyond placebo. Adults with an implanted DRG stimulator who have shown sustained pain relief will be randomized in a two-period crossover design to receive either active sub-threshold stimulation or sham stimulation, each for 5 days, with a washout period in between. The primary objective is to determine whether sub-threshold DRG stimulation reduces mean daily pain intensity compared with sham. Secondary objectives include assessing sleep quality, mood, daily activity, and safety/tolerability. Exploratory measures include device logs and rescue medication use. The findings of this trial will provide critical evidence on the efficacy of sub-threshold DRG stimulation, helping to inform clinical guidelines, payer decisions, and neuromodulation programming strategies worldwide.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
20
Continuous electrical stimulation delivered through an implanted DRG neurostimulator. Amplitude is set individually to 80% of each participant's perception threshold, ensuring no paresthesia is produced. Frequency and pulse width remain unchanged from the participant's established therapeutic settings. This sub-threshold programming distinguishes the intervention from suprathreshold (paresthesia-based) DRG stimulation used in earlier studies.
The implanted DRG stimulator remains switched off for the entire 5-day period. Device interrogation logs are masked to maintain blinding. No electrical stimulation is delivered, allowing a placebo-controlled comparison with active sub-threshold stimulation.
Neurokirurgiska kliniken. Neuromodulationsenheten
Umeå, Västerbotten County, Sweden
Average daily pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, 0-10)
Self-reported pain intensity recorded twice daily (morning and evening) using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable). Daily scores will be averaged across each treatment and washout period.
Time frame: Twice daily (morning and evening) from Day 0 through Day 11 (includes both 5-day treatment periods and the two 24-hour washout periods on Day 0 and Day 6).
Sleep quality (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC)
Self-reported sleep quality rated each morning using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, ranging from 1 = very much worse to 5 = very much improved. Higher scores indicate better sleep.
Time frame: Daily in the morning from Day 0 through Day 11.
Mood (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC)
Self-reported mood rated each evening using the PGIC scale, ranging from 1 = very much worse to 5 = very much improved. Higher scores indicate better mood.
Time frame: Daily in the evening from Day 0 through Day 11.
Daily activity (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC)
Self-reported daily activity rated each evening using the PGIC scale, ranging from 1 = very much worse to 5 = very much improved. Higher scores indicate better activity.
Time frame: Daily in the evening from Day 0 through Day 11.
Adverse events
Number and type of adverse events, documented with onset, severity, relatedness to treatment, and resolution.
Time frame: From day 0 through end of study (day 11).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.