The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different standardized physical therapy rehabilitation programs on outcomes after an ankle fracture. Researchers will evaluate to see if the addition of ankle muscle power exercises (AMP) improve program adherence, muscle function, physical performance, and patient reported outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Assess feasibility and define the initial effects of the AMP program on ankle plantar flexor rate of torque development and ankle power. Primary hypothesis: an ankle muscle power program will have acceptable feasibility through assessment of 80% adherence, 90% treatment fidelity, recruitment (48 participants who complete the study), 80% retention, and 80% acceptability of the AMP program to facilitate clinical translation and the ability to scale-up the treatment. In addition ankle plantar flexor muscle power, plantar flexor RTD assessed isometrically, and ankle joint power, evaluated during gait and stair ascent/descent, will have significantly greater improvements in the AMP group than the standard of care group at the end of the intervention. 2. Test the effect of the AMP program on physical performance. Primary hypothesis: those completing the AMP program will have greater improvements in the 40 meter fast paced walk test and 11-stair climb test than those completing standard of care at the completion of the intervention. 3. Assess the preliminary efficacy of the AMP program on patient reported outcomes and quality of life. Primary hypothesis: compared to standard of care, the AMP program will result in improved quality of life on the ankle fracture outcome rehabilitation measure (A-FORM) Participants will complete rehabilitation and be assessed for outcomes at baseline and after completing the intervention. Additionally exploratory outcomes will be assessed 3 months after completing the intervention.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
60
The AMP program targets various aspects of muscle power development through a program that takes the participant through 3 different stages of training over the course of their rehabilitation. This portion of the program is in addition to receiving standard rehabilitation exercises as well.
Standard rehabilitation program
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
RECRUITINGPercentage of Participants Adhering to the Intervention
Adherence refers to the commitment of a participant to participate in the rehab. Adherence will be measured by calculating the number of rehab sessions attended divided by the number of rehab sessions possible.
Time frame: From baseline assessment to completion of the 10 week intervention.
Percentage of Treatment That is Able to be Delivered (Fidelity)
Fidelity refers to the ability to perform the protocol as intended and that the participants receive the intended treatment as designed. It will be calculated as the number of deviations from protocol divided by the number of treatment sessions.
Time frame: From baseline assessment to completion of the 10 week intervention.
Percentage of Participants Completing the Intervention (Retention)
This will be calculated as the number of participants completing each intervention divided by the number of participants who start each intervention.
Time frame: From baseline assessment to completion of the 10 week intervention.
Percentage of Participants Who Find the Program Acceptable/Satisfactory
A participant satisfaction survey will be utilized to evaluate each rehabilitation protocol, care given, and rehab facility procedures. Scores will range from 1 to 5 with 1 indicating poor performance of the facility and care received versus 5 indicating excellent performance of the facility and care received.
Time frame: From baseline assessment to completion of the 10 week intervention.
Change in Isometric Ankle Plantar Flexor Muscle Power
Will be assessed isotonically on a dynamometer as the change in peak power from baseline to post-intervention follow-up
Time frame: Baseline assessment and post intervention visit (10-12 weeks following baseline)
Change in Ankle Rate of Torque Development (Ankle RTD)
Will be assessed isometrically on a dynamometer as the change between baseline and post-intervention follow-up. Ankle RTD is calculated as the initial slope of the generated force curve, measured in Newton meters per second.
Time frame: Baseline assessment and post intervention visit (10-12 weeks following baseline)
Change in Ankle Joint Power During Gait
Ankle joint power measured with 3D motion capture during walking
Time frame: Baseline and post intervention (10-12 weeks following baseline)
Change in Ankle Joint Power During Stairs (step up and down)
Ankle joint power measured with 3D motion capture while climbing stairs
Time frame: Baseline and post intervention (10-12 weeks following baseline)
Change in Usual Gait Speed
Participants will walk at a pace that feels normal for the participant with the time to complete 5 meters recorded.
Time frame: Baseline and post intervention (10-12 weeks following baseline)
Change in Fastest Gait Speed
Participants will walk at their fastest comfortable speed with the time to complete 5 meters recored.
Time frame: Baseline and following completion of the intervention (10-12 weeks post baseline visit)
Change in 11 Stair Climb Test Score
The stair test is a measurement of functional strength, balance, and agility achieved by ascending and descending a specific number of steps (11). Scoring involves recording the total time taken to ascend and descend the steps to the nearest 100th of a second. Lower values indicate better performance.
Time frame: Baseline visit and post intervention visit (10-12 weeks post baseline)
Change in Ankle fracture outcome rehabilitation measure (A-FORM)
The Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM) is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess recovery after an ankle fracture. It focuses on physical, social, and psychological aspects of recovery. A summary score (ranging from 0 to 100) is calculated, with lower scores indicating better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline and post intervention (10-12 weeks following baseline)
Change in PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test
The PROMIS Physical Function computer adaptive test will be administered to each subject. Scale 0-100, where higher numbers indicate better physical functioning. A score of 50 is consistent with the mean score of the U.S. general population.
Time frame: Baseline assessment and post intervention visit (10-12 weeks later)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.