Background: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, and impaired executive functioning. It typically begins in childhood and is often first diagnosed at school age due to learning and social behavioral difficulties. Therefore, ADHD treatment aims to directly enhance attention, reduce hyperactivity and impulsivity, and ultimately improve task performance and associated behavioral and relational issues. Objective of the Clinical Trial: To evaluate the safety of the investigational digital therapeutic device for the treatment of ADHD. To evaluate the efficacy of the investigational digital therapeutic device for the treatment of ADHD. Study Design \& Methodology: A total of 122 participants were enrolled (62 in the treatment group and 60 in the control group), with 114 participants included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS: 58 treatment, 56 control).
Expanded Clinical Summary: Investigational Digital Therapeutic Device for ADHD \[Background and Rationale\] Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a persistent pattern of inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, and impairments in executive function. These symptoms typically begin in childhood and are often first identified in school-aged children due to learning difficulties or social behavioral issues. Effective treatment of ADHD aims to improve sustained attention, reduce hyperactivity and impulsivity, and enhance the patient's ability to engage in academic, social, and daily life activities. While pharmacological interventions have been the mainstay of treatment, increasing attention has been directed toward non-pharmacologic and digital therapeutic approaches, particularly those that can target cognitive mechanisms such as executive functioning through neuroplasticity-enhancing modalities. \[Objectives of the Clinical Trial\] The aim of this clinical investigation was twofold: To assess the safety of the investigational digital therapeutic (DTx) device when used by children diagnosed with ADHD. To evaluate the efficacy of the DTx in improving core symptoms of ADHD compared to a sham (placebo) digital intervention. \[Study Design and Methodology\] This was a prospective, multi-center, single-blind, randomized controlled confirmatory trial involving two arms: an experimental group receiving the active digital therapeutic intervention and a control group receiving a digital sham. The investigational DTx is a game-based software intervention designed to train cognitive flexibility, working memory, and inhibitory control - core executive functions associated with ADHD - through repetitive and engaging digital activities. -Primary Outcomes: ADHD-RS (Investigator-Rated Scale) -Secondary Outcomes: Additional cognitive and behavioral endpoints further supported the efficacy of the intervention. * Parent-rated ADHD-RS-IV (Korean ADHD Rating Scale, K-ARS) * Stroop Color-Word Interference Test (color-word score) * Advanced Test of Attention (ATA), visual sensitivity score * CGI-S(Clinical Global Impression-Severity) * CGI-I(Clinical Global Impression-Improvement) * CCTT(Children's Color Trails Test) * K-CPRS(Korean-Conners Parents Rating Scale) * WCST(Wisconsin Card Sorting Test) * Changes in Medication Dosage * Patient-Reported Outcomes \[Safety Evaluation\] Safety was assessed throughout the study period by monitoring adverse events.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
120
The investigational device incorporated both a driving simulation and an N-Back cognitive training function. These features were designed to engage and improve key cognitive abilities such as attention, working memory, and executive function, which are often impaired in individuals with ADHD. The combined use of driving tasks and N-Back exercises aimed to provide a comprehensive and interactive therapeutic intervention to reduce core ADHD symptoms.
The placebo device incorporated only the driving simulation function and excluded the N-Back cognitive training component. The driving simulation was designed as a sham intervention to mimic the user experience without providing the active therapeutic elements targeting cognitive functions. This setup enabled a controlled comparison with the active digital therapeutic device.
Emotiv
Seoul, gangnam, South Korea
Change from baseline in ADHD-RS (Investigator-Rated Scale) at end of treatment (FAS)
The Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS, Investigator-Rated) is a clinician-administered assessment tool based on the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD. It includes 18 items, with 9 items assessing inattention and 9 items assessing hyperactivity/impulsivity. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = never or rarely, 3 = very often). The total score reflects overall ADHD symptom severity, with higher scores indicating greater severity. The investigator-rated version is completed by a trained clinician through interviews and behavioral observations, rather than by parents or teachers.
Time frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
ADHD-RS-IV (Parent-rated, Korean version)
The Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV, Parent-rated, Korean version) is a standardized rating scale based on the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD. It consists of 18 items corresponding to the inattention (9 items) and hyperactivity/impulsivity (9 items) symptom domains. Parents rate the frequency of each symptom on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often). The Korean version has been translated and validated for use in Korean populations. Higher scores indicate greater severity of ADHD symptoms.
Time frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
CGI-S(Clinical Global Impression-Severity)
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scale is a 7-point clinician-rated scale that assesses the clinician's global impression of the patient's current illness severity at the time of evaluation. The scale ranges from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). It provides a simple, standardized measure of overall illness severity, independent of specific symptom rating scales.
Time frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
CGI-I(Clinical Global Impression-Improvement)
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) scale is a 7-point clinician-rated scale used to assess how much a patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to baseline.
Time frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
CCTT(Children's Color Trails Test)
The Children's Color Trails Test (CCTT) is a neuropsychological assessment tool designed to evaluate cognitive functions in children, particularly: * Attention and sustained focus * Cognitive flexibility (set-shifting, task-switching) * Processing speed * Executive functioning
Time frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
Stroop
The Stroop Test (Stroop Color and Word Test) is a widely used neuropsychological assessment designed to measure attention, selective attention, processing speed, and inhibitory control, which are key aspects of executive function.
Time frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
Changes in Medication Dosage
Changes in Medication Dosage refers to any adjustments in the dose of a participant's prescribed ADHD medication during the study period.
Time frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
Patient-Centered Outcomes
Satisfaction (10-point) Participants will rate their overall satisfaction with the intervention on a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. Task Difficulty (10-point) Participants will rate the perceived difficulty of the tasks on a 10-point VAS, with higher scores indicating greater difficulty. Suggestions for Improvement (Open-ended) Participants can provide subjective comments or suggestions regarding the intervention. Willingness to Pay (Objective) Participants will indicate their willingness to pay for the intervention using a structured, objective questionnaire.
Time frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.