The placement of short implants in post-extraction sockets is a valuable option when residual bone height is limited, minimizing morbidity and treatment time. The management of the peri-implant gap and soft tissues may influence primary stability, hard/soft tissue remodeling, and implant success.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
10
Two widely used approaches include: 1. Socket grafting with a fully resorbable synthetic biomaterial (β-tricalcium phosphate + calcium sulfate). 2. Socket grafting with a xenograft and a custom Sealing Socket Abutment (SSA) with a concave emergence profile. No randomized controlled trials have yet compared these protocols with integrated outcomes including resonance frequency analysis, peri-implant health indices, radiographic bone level changes, and digital intraoral scanning (IOS)-based morphometric analysis.
University of Bari Aldo Moro
Bari, Italy
RECRUITINGPrimary stability
To compare the primary stability (ISQ values at implant insertion) of short implants placed in post-extraction sockets using the two grafting protocols.
Time frame: 1 month
Clinical Indices
To assess peri-implant health indices (PD)
Time frame: 12 months
Clinical Indices
To assess peri-implant health indices (BoP)
Time frame: 12 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.