The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel diagnostic strategy for prostate cancer, in which men with a moderate risk of prostate cancer are monitored using PSA and MRI instead of immediate biopsy,. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is it safe to delay biopsy, making sure that clinical significant prostate cancers are not often missed? * Does it reduce unnecessary biopsies and overtreatment?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
503
Men with PI-RADS 3 or 4 lesions and a PSA density ≤ 0.15 ng/mL² are actively monitored with PSA testing every six months and MRI annually, instead of undergoing immediate prostate biopsy.
Treant
Emmen, Drenthe, Netherlands
RECRUITINGAndros Clinics
Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands
RECRUITINGRadboud University Medical Centre
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
RECRUITINGCanisius Wilhelmina Hospital
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
RECRUITINGAntoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
RECRUITINGMaasstad Hospital
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGSt Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
RECRUITINGProportion clinically significant prostate cancer missed during follow up
Detection percentage of International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (ISUP GG)≥ 2 prostate cancer (= clinically significant prostate cancer) during 48 months of follow up compared with the percentage of total ISUP GG≥ 2 during the study, including any findings from end of study biopsies. ISUP grade groups range from 1 to 5, and a ISUP GG≥ 2 is defined as clinically significant prostate cancer.
Time frame: 48 months
Number of clinically insignificant prostate cancer detected
Detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (ISUP GG) 1) during the 48 months of follow up compared to the total ISUP GG 1 including end of study biopsies.
Time frame: 48 months
Number of negative biopsies
Number of participants with negative biopsy results during the study including findings from the end of study biopsies.
Time frame: 48 months
Grade shifts
Progression rates of intermediate- to high-risk group during monitoring, rates of downgrading from intermediate risk to low risk
Time frame: 48 months
Detection of very high risk prostate cancer
Detection of very high risk prostate cancer (ISUP GG ≥ 3) during the study, including end of study biopsies.
Time frame: 48 months
Health-related quality of life (EPIC-26 score)
Change in health-related quality of life as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26), a validated questionnaire with subscales ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better function and less symptom burden. Although the diagnosis of prostate cancer is not confirmed, this is the best validated and suitable questionnaire. Participants will be asked to fill in the questionnaire once a year.
Time frame: 48 months
Estimated average cost per patient during 48-month follow-up
Mean cost per participant over 48 months, including diagnostics (e.g. MRI, biopsies), consultations, and treatments, based on predefined unit costs and healthcare utilization.
Time frame: 48 months
Anxiety symptomes (STAI-6 score)
Change in anxiety levels as measured by the 6-item short form of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6), with scores ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety. Participants will be asked to fill in the questionnaire once a year.
Time frame: 48 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.