In order to further verify the effectiveness of the new prevention irradiation model for low-risk areas for nasopharyngeal carcinoma under immunotherapy, our team intends to conduct a non-inferiority clinical trial. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two treatment modalities - local region reduced-target radiotherapy versus full-target radiatiotherapy (with/without CTV2) for newly diagnosed distant metastasis nasopharyngeal carcinoma, based on the full-course immunotherapy and full-dose chemotherapy. The primary endpoints are 2-year PFS and the incidence of grade 3 or higher radiation-related adverse events. If non-inferiority is confirmed, a new standard of "immunotherapy combined with reduced-target radiotherapy" will be established, ensuring efficacy while significantly reducing toxicity, and providing a more optimal comprehensive treatment strategy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a highly prevalent malignant tumor in the southern regions of China, with approximately 4% to 10% of patients presenting with distant metastasis at the initial diagnosis. The five-year survival rate of traditional sole systemic chemotherapy is less than 10%, and there is an urgent need to explore more effective treatment strategies. Our team previously conducted a single-center study (402 cases) and a national multicenter retrospective study (794 cases) and first revealed that local regional radiotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy resulted in a 60% reduction in mortality compared to systemic chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.40) (Chen MY, Chin J Cancer, 2013; Eur J Cancer, 2015). To verify this finding, with the support of the 5010 project of Sun Yat-sen University, our team initiated the world's first phase III prospective clinical trial for newly diagnosed distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in 2014. This trial confirmed that after 6 courses of adequate systemic chemotherapy, the control group was followed up, while the experimental group received local regional full-target area adequate radiotherapy, covering the gross tumor volume (GTV), high-risk clinical target area 1 (CTV1), and low-risk clinical target area 2 (CTV2), with a total radical dose of 70 Gy, 60 Gy and 54 Gy for prophylactic radiotherapy, extending the median progression-free survival (mPFS) from 6.7 months to 12.4 months, and the 2-year PFS rate from 3.6% to 35.0%. This "adequate chemotherapy + full-target adequate radiotherapy" dual-model achieved the "Global ASCO 17 Major Clinical Oncology Breakthrough" by the American Society of Clinical Oncology in 2021, directly promoting the inclusion of local radiotherapy in the standard recommended treatment for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the US NCCN treatment guidelines, European ESMO guidelines, Chinese CSCO guidelines and CACA guidelines (Chen MY, JAMA Oncology, 2020). With the widespread application of PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, GP chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (with a maximum mPFS of 21.4 months and 2-year PFS of 44.8%) has become the first-line chemotherapy regimen for recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, these single-drug studies did not combine local-region radiotherapy, and its value in newly diagnosed distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma has not been optimized. Therefore, our team further conducted a phase II clinical trial, sequentially administering local-region full-target radiotherapy and PD-1 monoclonal antibody during and after systemic adequate chemotherapy, and the results showed that the mPFS exceeded 30.6 months, and the 2-year PFS rate reached 54%, confirming the outstanding efficacy of the "adequate chemotherapy + half-course immunotherapy + full-target radiotherapy" triple model (Chen MY, Cell Reports Medicine, 2023). However, the preventive irradiation area CTV2 in full-target radiotherapy has a wide coverage and is irradiated with a dose of 54 Gy or more, resulting in a 33.9% incidence of grade 3 acute mucositis and 5.2% of late hearing damage and other adverse events, severely restricting treatment tolerance. Moreover, basic research has revealed that lymph node integrity is crucial for immunotherapy, and excessive destruction of draining lymph nodes (\>30 Gy) will deplete the Tim-3-TCF-1⁺ CD8+ T cell subset (with stem cell characteristics, driving long-term responses to PD-1 monoclonal antibodies), while weakening the ability of antigen-presenting cells to activate T cells, leading to impaired systemic anti-tumor immunity. Clinical retrospective analysis also indicates that patients undergoing extensive preventive lymph node dissection who received PD-1 monoclonal antibody treatment had significantly shorter PFS (HR = 0.46). Based on this, we propose the following hypothesis: In the era of immunotherapy, omitting the traditional CTV2 for the irradiation area, and exempting the low-risk invasion area of the primary lesion and the lymphatic drainage areas such as the neck II-IV zone from the preventive irradiation, can not only reduce toxicity but also preserve the lymph node immune microenvironment, thereby potentially enhancing the systemic anti-tumor response and being more conducive to the control of systemic metastatic lesions. Therefore, our team has further carried out a phase II clinical trial. After 6 courses of full-dose chemotherapy and immunotherapy, sequential local-region reduced-CTV2 radiotherapy and concurrent and maintenance immunotherapy of PD-1 monoclonal antibody were administered. The results showed that the 1-year PFS rate was as high as 77%, preliminarily suggesting that the "full-dose chemotherapy + full-course immunotherapy + reduced target radiotherapy" new triad model may be superior to the conventional full-target radiotherapy original triad model. To further verify the effectiveness of this new model, our team intends to conduct the world's first phase III non-inferiority clinical trial for the initial treatment of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Patients with newly diagnosis distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma who respond sensitively to chemoradiotherapy will be included. Under the full-course PD-1 treatment, they will randomly receive reduced-target radiotherapy (GTV + CTV1) or full-target radiotherapy (GTV + CTV1 + CTV2). The primary endpoints are the 2-year PFS rate (non-inferiority threshold HR = 1.5) and the incidence of grade 3 or higher radiotherapy-related adverse events. The innovation of this research lies in: pioneering a new radiotherapy strategy under nasopharyngeal carcinoma immunotherapy that exempts the preventive irradiation of low-risk areas; revealing the mechanism correlation between reduced-target radiotherapy and the dynamics of immune cell subgroups; providing evidence-based evidence for "minimal irradiation" in immunotherapy for solid tumors. If the study confirms non-inferiority, it will achieve three major translational values: clinical level, establishing a new standard of "reduced-target radiotherapy - immune synergy"; scientific level, clarifying the regulatory role of lymph node microenvironment in radiotherapy and immunotherapy; social level, optimizing the allocation of medical resources by improving the quality of life of patients and their treatment compliance. The implementation of this study will challenge the traditional full-target radiotherapy paradigm, providing a more efficient and less toxic reduced-target radiotherapy scheme for metastasis nasopharyngeal carcinoma, as well as locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and even other solid tumors, with significant clinical and scientific significance.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
166
Experimental group: GTVnx: 69.96 Gy/33 Fr/2.12 Gy; GTVnd: 69.96 Gy/33 Fr/2.12 Gy; CTV1: 60.60 Gy/33 Fr/1.82 Gy; GTV2: No prescription dose (only delineated, actual dose is scattered dose).
Control group: GTVnx: 69.96 Gy/33 F/2.12 Gy; GTVnd: 69.96 Gy/33 F/2.12 Gy; CTV1: 59.4 Gy/33 F/1.8 Gy; CTV2: 54 Gy/33 F/1.64 Gy.
The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000 Recruiting
Zhuhai, China
RECRUITING2-year Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
The PFS was defined as the duration from the date of random assignment to the date of disease progression or censored at the date of the last follow-up.
Time frame: 2 years
The incidence rate of radiotherapy-related ≥ grade 3 adverse events
Including the evaluation of acute subjective and objective toxic reactions as well as the evaluation of late subjective toxic reactions. The NCI-CTC 5.0 standard and RTOG standard were adopted.
Time frame: 2 years
Objective Response Rate(ORR)
Defined as the proportion of patients who, after receiving treatment, have achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and maintain this state for a certain period of time (evaluated by the investigator according to RECIST 1.1)
Time frame: 2 years
Disease control rate (DCR)
Defined as the proportion of patients who achieve CR + PR + SD after receiving treatment, and maintain this state for at least 4 weeks.
Time frame: 2 years
Overall survival time (OS)
Defined as the time interval from the start of randomization, due to any cause, death occurs (if no death, censored at the last known survival date).
Time frame: 2 years
Health-related Quality of Life
Changes from baseline in patient-reported quality of life scores assessed every 2 cycles using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, version C30). The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life outcome.
Time frame: 2 years
Adverse Events Reporting
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: 2 years
Head and Neck Cancer-Specific Quality of Life
Changes from baseline in head and neck cancer-specific symptoms and functions assessed every 2 cycles using the EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 module (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Head and Neck Cancer Module). The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life outcome and lower scores indicating worse symptoms or functions.
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.