The Effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine Versus Methotrexate in the Treatment of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia in Routine Clinical Care: a Patient Preference Trial (FFA Trial)

Overview

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a type of scarring hair loss that mostly affects women and causes permanent hair loss. Two medicines, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and methotrexate (MTX), are often used to treat FFA, but it is not yet clear which treatment works better. This study aims to compare the effects of HCQ and MTX in everyday clinical care. Adults with FFA who choose to start either HCQ or MTX and will be followed for up to 48 weeks. The main goal is to see how well each medicine helps reduce disease activity, measured by a tool called the Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) after 6 months. At each clinic visit, participants will also complete short questionnaires about symptoms, quality of life, and general well-being. By collecting this information, the study hopes to provide better evidence about how well HCQ and MTX work for FFA, which may help guide future treatment recommendations.

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a form of primary cicatricial alopecia characterized by progressive, irreversible hair loss. It typically affects postmenopausal women. The disease presents with frontotemporal hairline recession, eyebrow loss, and perifollicular inflammation. Although the exact cause remains unclear, an autoimmune-mediated destruction of follicular stem cells is suspected. Treatment options are limited and largely empirical. Among systemic therapies, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and methotrexate (MTX) are the most commonly prescribed in clinical practice. Both drugs are used off-label, and there is no consensus on their effectiveness. Existing studies are mostly retrospective or small-scale. As a result, clinical decision-making is highly variable and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. This multicenter, prospective patient preference trial has been designed to evaluate the effectiveness of HCQ compared with MTX in adults with FFA under routine clinical care conditions. Study procedures: Eligible patients (≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of FFA will be recruited at dermatology outpatient clinics. Patients will select either HCQ (400 mg daily) or MTX (15 mg weekly, with folate supplementation), according to shared decision-making and standard prescribing protocols. Follow-up will occur at regular intervals consistent with standard care: baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. The primary outcome is the change in Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) between baseline and 24 weeks. FFASS is a validated composite tool incorporating clinical signs, hairline recession, and patient symptoms. Secondary outcomes include disease severity across all time points, patient-reported health-related quality of life (Skindex-29, CASIS), adverse events, discontinuation rates, and cost-effectiveness based on health economics instruments (EQ-5D-5L with bolt-ons, ICECAP-A, iMCQ, iPCQ). All FFASS assessments will be performed by two raters using standardized clinical photography and trichoscopy. Sample size and feasibility: As FFA is a rare disease, no formal power calculation was performed. Recruitment will continue for 12 months, aiming for a minimum of 25 patients per treatment arm (50 total). This sample size is consistent with exploratory studies in rare conditions and is expected to generate meaningful preliminary evidence. Statistical analysis: Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Primary endpoint comparisons (change in FFASS from baseline to week 24) will be performed using independent-samples tests or non-parametric equivalents, as appropriate. Longitudinal changes will be analyzed with linear mixed-effects models to account for repeated measures and potential confounding factors (e.g., age, sex, disease duration, baseline severity). Because treatment allocation is preference-based rather than randomized, baseline characteristics will be carefully compared and adjusted for in multivariate analyses. Propensity score methods may be applied to further control for allocation bias. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed with similar mixed models or descriptive statistics, depending on variable type. Data management and quality assurance: Data will be collected and stored in the validated Castor EDC platform, with patient information pseudonymized. Photos and clinical data will be retained securely for a minimum of 10 years, in line with Erasmus MC guidelines and FAIR data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). Privacy and confidentiality will be strictly maintained, and access will be restricted to authorized research team members. Risks and burden: Both HCQ and MTX are well-established systemic treatments in dermatology, prescribed within their standard safety monitoring frameworks. The study does not require additional clinic visits beyond routine care. The only extra element is the completion of short questionnaires, taking approximately 5-15 minutes at specified visits. Risks are therefore considered negligible. This study addresses an urgent knowledge gap in FFA by providing prospective, systematically collected real-world data on the effectiveness and tolerability of HCQ and MTX. The results are expected to inform future treatment guidelines and improve evidence-based care for this rare and burdensome condition.