The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of firsekibart versus anakinra in patients with AOSD.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
20
Firsekibart will be administered according to the protocol
Anakinra will be administered according to the protocol
Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
RECRUITINGThe proportion of subjects achieving clinical inactive disease (CID) at Week 24, where CID is defined as the absence of Still's disease-related symptoms with normal ESR or CRP levels.
Time frame: At Week 24 from initiation of treatment
Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥50% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range at Weeks 2, 4, and 8.
Efficacy Endpoints
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 4, and 8 after treatment initiation
Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥70% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range at Week 12.
Efficacy Endpoints
Time frame: At Week 12 after treatment initiation
Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥70% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range, and glucocorticoid dose ≤0.2 mg/kg/day at Week 12.
Efficacy Endpoints
Time frame: At Week 12 after treatment initiation
Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥70% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range, and glucocorticoid dose ≤0.1 mg/kg/day at Week 12.
Efficacy Endpoints
Time frame: At Week 12 after treatment initiation
Proportion of subjects achieving clinical inactive disease (CID) with discontinuation of glucocorticoids
Efficacy Endpoints
Time frame: At Week 24 after treatment initiation
Proportion of subjects without disease relapse at Weeks 12 and 24.
Efficacy Endpoints
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: At Weeks 12 and 24 after treatment initiation
ACR30, ACR50, ACR70, and ACR90 response rates at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
Efficacy Endpoints
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation
Change from baseline in ferritin levels at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
Efficacy Endpoints
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation
Change from baseline in cytokine levels (including sIL-2R) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
Efficacy Endpoints
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation
Change from baseline in ESR at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
Efficacy Endpoints
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation
Change from baseline in CRP levels at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Efficacy Endpoints
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation
Change from baseline in Pouchot score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
Efficacy Endpoints. Pouchot score ranges from 0 to 12 points, with higher scores indicating a poorer outcome.
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation
Change from baseline in glucocorticoid dose at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
Efficacy Endpoints
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiation
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year