Clinical Application of Somatostatin Receptor and Norepinephrine Transporter Targeted Imaging for Diagnosis and Staging of Neuroblastoma and Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of somatostatin receptor and norepinephrine transporter targeted imaging (including 18F-MFBG, 123I-MIBG, 131I-MIBG, 68Ga-DOTA-NOC, 68Ga-DOTA-TATE, 68Ga-DOTA-TOC, and other radiolabeled somatostatin analogues) in the diagnosis and staging of neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma patients aged 1-70 years. The main questions it aims to answer are: Can molecular targeted imaging using various norepinephrine transporter tracers (18F-MFBG, 123I/131I-MIBG) and somatostatin receptor tracers (68Ga-DOTA-peptides series) accurately detect primary tumors and metastatic lesions in neuroblastoma/pheochromocytoma patients? What is the comparative diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) of different molecular imaging techniques compared to histopathological diagnosis as the gold standard? Researchers will compare the imaging findings from multiple tracer types with surgical pathology results to assess diagnostic accuracy and clinical staging precision. Participants will: * Undergo screening assessments including medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests * Receive intravenous injection of selected tracers (18F-MFBG, 68Ga-DOTA-NOC/TATE, or other appropriate agents) at standardized doses followed by PET-CT/MRI imaging at optimal time points * Undergo histopathological examination within 2 months post-imaging * Complete safety follow-up for 6 months to monitor for any adverse reactions to the imaging agents

This single-center, open-label diagnostic imaging study investigates the clinical utility of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) and norepinephrine transporter (NET) targeted molecular imaging for detection, staging, and treatment planning in patients with neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL). The biological rationale rests on the frequent overexpression of NET in sympathoneuronal tumors and SSTR in neuroendocrine-derived neoplasms, enabling high-contrast visualization of primary and metastatic disease, including bone and bone marrow involvement. The protocol emphasizes harmonized acquisition and reconstruction parameters, quantitative analysis, and rigorous comparison against a composite reference standard comprising histopathology when available and multidisciplinary clinical adjudication. The imaging strategy purposefully includes a broad spectrum of tracers within the SSTR and NET classes to capture complementary biology and to accommodate variability in patient phenotype, prior therapies, and local availability. For NET-targeted imaging, the study may employ 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) with planar and SPECT/CT techniques, 131I-MIBG as a legacy diagnostic alternative where appropriate, 18F-meta-fluorobenzylguanidine (18F-MFBG) for PET/CT or PET/MRI with improved resolution and logistics, 18F-LMI1195 as an investigational PET agent subject to site availability, 11C-hydroxyephedrine (11C-HED) PET where a cyclotron is accessible, and 18F-fluorodopamine (18F-FDA) PET in centers with established protocols. For SSTR-targeted imaging, the protocol allows 68Ga-DOTATATE, 68Ga-DOTATOC, and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT or PET/MRI as contemporary standards; 64Cu-DOTATATE to leverage its longer half-life and extended imaging window; 18F-labeled SSTR agents such as 18F-SiTATE and 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide where available; and legacy SPECT agents including 111In-pentetreotide (Octreoscan) and 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC or 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC depending on local practice. Tracer selection is individualized based on clinical indication, age, renal and hepatic function, concomitant medications, and logistical factors; when clinically justified and feasible, intra-patient multi-tracer imaging within and across SSTR and NET classes may be performed to enable head-to-head comparisons. FDG and CXCR4 PET/CT or PET/MRI may be performed solely as optional comparator imaging at investigator discretion and contingent on site capability and local approvals. Optional comparators include 18F-FDG and CXCR4-targeted agents such as 68Ga-Pentixafor (and 64Cu-Pentixafor where permitted). These scans are not required for enrollment or primary analyses but may support exploratory comparisons in predefined subgroups. Radiopharmaceutical preparation follows good manufacturing practice with predefined batch release specifications, including radiochemical purity (typically ≥95% for PET peptides), acceptable pH range, sterility, endotoxin limits, and specific activity as applicable. Each batch is accompanied by a certificate of analysis, lot traceability, and temperature and transport documentation, and any deviations are handled under corrective and preventive action procedures. Handling, storage, and administration comply with institutional radiation safety policies and national regulations. For optional comparator agents, applicable pharmacopeial or investigator's brochure specifications are followed. Patient preparation adheres to tracer-specific guidance. For NET imaging, medications that interfere with catecholamine transport or storage (for example, labetalol and certain antidepressants) are reviewed and managed per site standard operating procedures, and thyroid blockade is implemented when indicated for radioiodine-labeled agents. For SSTR imaging, somatostatin analogues are managed to minimize receptor blockade when clinically appropriate. Hydration and frequent voiding are encouraged to reduce background activity. When optional 18F-FDG imaging is performed, patients fast for at least 4-6 hours, non-glucose-containing hydration is encouraged, strenuous exercise is avoided for 24 hours, and blood glucose is checked and documented prior to injection; insulin correction, if used, follows site policy to avoid altered biodistribution. When optional CXCR4 imaging is performed, no specific dietary restrictions apply; recent exposure to hematopoietic growth factors (for example, G-CSF) is recorded, and imaging may be deferred when clinically safe to mitigate confounding marrow uptake. Acquisition timing follows established windows, such as approximately 90-180 minutes post-injection for 18F-MFBG, about 20-24 hours for 123I-MIBG planar/SPECT-CT (with optional early or delayed views), roughly 45-90 minutes for 68Ga-DOTA-peptides, approximately 60-180 minutes for 64Cu-DOTATATE, and around 60-120 minutes for 18F-labeled SSTR agents. For optional comparator scans, the recommended uptake times are approximately 50-70 minutes for 18F-FDG (acceptable range 45-90 minutes, time-stamped) and approximately 45-75 minutes for 68Ga-Pentixafor. Whole-body coverage typically spans from the skull vertex to mid-thigh, extended as clinically indicated; PET imaging uses 3D acquisition with attenuation and scatter correction, and SPECT employs iterative reconstruction with CT-based attenuation and scatter correction when available. Pediatric protocols prioritize dose optimization and motion mitigation, including sedation per institutional policy when required. Quantitative analysis uses standardized regions of interest to derive SUVmax and SUVmean for PET, lesion-to-background ratios, and optional volumetric metrics such as total lesion uptake and metabolic or receptor-expressing tumor volume. For SPECT, semi-quantitative indices such as lesion-to-liver or lesion-to-mediastinum ratios and established MIBG scoring systems are applied where relevant. Optional comparator scans, when performed, follow the same quantitative framework; for 18F-FDG, lean-body-mass-normalized SUVs and metabolic tumor volume/total lesion glycolysis are recommended, and for CXCR4, lesion-to-liver or lesion-to-blood pool ratios may be recorded to assist harmonization. Image interpretation is performed by two blinded readers with adjudication of discrepancies, and lesion mapping records locations by compartment, including primary tumor, nodal stations, bone and bone marrow, soft tissue, liver, lung, adrenal, and other sites. The reference standard integrates histopathology, correlative cross-sectional imaging, and clinical follow-up to adjudicate lesion truth status. In cases of modality discordance, targeted biopsy or directed follow-up is prioritized when clinically appropriate to refine the composite reference standard. Data are captured in a validated electronic data capture environment with role-based access controls and full audit trails. The database implements automated range checks, temporal consistency checks for dose and acquisition timestamps, cross-form logic for tracer-modality pairing and pediatric weight-based dosing, and site-level reconciliation of imaging metadata (for example, DICOM headers) with case report forms. When optional comparator scans are performed, additional fields capture FDG-specific variables (fasting duration, pre-injection blood glucose, insulin use and timing, uptake time, ambient warming status) and CXCR4-specific variables (recent growth factor exposure and timing, white blood cell/absolute neutrophil counts when available, and timing of cytotoxic or steroid therapy relative to imaging). Source data verification is conducted on a predefined fraction of cases against medical records, radiopharmacy logs, imaging archives, and pathology reports. A comprehensive data dictionary specifies variable definitions, sources, units, coding standards such as MedDRA for adverse events, and normal or reference ranges where applicable. Written standard operating procedures govern study operations, including screening and consent, patient preparation and tracer administration, acquisition and reconstruction parameters, image reading and adjudication, data entry and query resolution, adverse event reporting, change control, and archival. The study is exploratory in size and designed to estimate diagnostic performance with acceptable precision rather than to test a formal hypothesis. Primary analyses focus on SSTR- and NET-based imaging and will report per-patient and per-lesion sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value against the reference standard. Secondary and exploratory objectives include comparative effectiveness between NET and SSTR classes and within-class comparisons where intra- or inter-patient data allow, as well as subgroup analyses by disease category, metastatic distribution, and prior therapy. Where optional comparator scans are available, incremental and added-value analyses will evaluate their yield beyond SSTR/NET imaging using paired methods (for example, McNemar tests for sensitivity/specificity and decision-impact rates where management recommendations are captured). Statistical methods include exact confidence intervals for proportions, receiver operating characteristic analysis with area under the curve estimation, agreement metrics such as Cohen's kappa, and models that account for lesion-level clustering, for example generalized estimating equations. Multiplicity will be managed via hierarchical analysis plans or false discovery rate control for exploratory endpoints. Missing data are minimized prospectively through time-stamped workflows and automated completeness checks; missingness is categorized as missing, unavailable, non-reported, or not interpretable, and the primary analyses use complete-case datasets with sensitivity analyses employing appropriate imputation strategies when assumptions are defensible. Safety oversight includes systematic collection of adverse events from tracer administration through follow-up, graded according to CTCAE version 5.0, with expedited reporting for serious and unexpected events per institutional and regulatory requirements. Radiation dosimetry is tracked at the participant level by tracer and modality, and cumulative exposure is maintained within diagnostic reference levels for the relevant age group. For optional comparator imaging, risks specific to the agents used are monitored and managed per protocol and local policy. The study is conducted in accordance with ICH-GCP and the Declaration of Helsinki, with institutional review board approval and written informed consent or assent obtained prior to any study procedures. Periodic monitoring and audits, on-site or remote as appropriate, verify adherence to the protocol, standard operating procedures, and the predefined data quality plan.