This single-arm, open-label, Phase II study assesses first-line QL1706 (iparomlimab and tuvonralimab, an anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) combined with platinum-based chemotherapy to treat patients with treatment-naïve, locally advanced or metastatic, SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main questions it aims to answer are:Evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination regimen in this specific patient population. Explore correlations between tumor molecular characteristics, the immune microenvironment, and treatment efficacy or toxicity. Participants must: Have histologically or cytologically confirmed, treatment-naïve, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with SMARCA4 deficiency. Be willing to provide archived or fresh tumor tissue samples. If unavailable, enrollment may proceed per investigator assessment. Have at least one measurable lesion per RECIST v1.1.
SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a highly aggressive molecular subtype, accounting for approximately 5-10% of all NSCLC cases. The majority of patients (over 80%) present with distant metastases at diagnosis, and prognosis is exceptionally poor, with median overall survival (mOS) historically ranging from 4 to 7 months. Currently, no standardized treatment exists for this subset, and therapeutic efficacy remains limited. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with platinum-based chemotherapy have become a cornerstone of treatment for advanced NSCLC without driver mutations. However, the benefit of this approach in SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC is uncertain and appears heterogeneous. A large retrospective analysis (n=707) indicated that SMARCA4-mutant tumors derived significantly less benefit from first-line chemoimmunotherapy compared to wild-type tumors, showing inferior objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Conversely, other retrospective data suggest a potential survival advantage with ICI-chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. This discrepancy may be influenced by BRG1 protein expression loss, a key molecular feature with prognostic implications, highlighting the complexity of this disease and the need for prospective validation. QL1706 (iparomlimab and tuvonralimab) is a novel bifunctional MabPair antibody that concurrently targets PD-1 and CTLA-4 at a fixed 2:1 ratio. This design aims to enhance synergistic immune activation while potentially mitigating toxicity associated with conventional CTLA-4 inhibition. Approved in 2024, QL1706 has demonstrated promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile in multiple solid tumors, including NSCLC. In the DUBHE-L-201 trial, QL1706 combined with chemotherapy demonstrated encouraging activity. To date, there are no prospective clinical data on the use of QL1706 combined with chemotherapy in SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC. This phase II, single-arm, open-label trial is proposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QL1706 plus platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC. The study aims to address a significant unmet need and explore a potentially effective therapeutic strategy for this challenging patient population.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
28
Participants will receive QL1706 (5 mg/kg, IV, day 1) in combination with nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m², IV, day 1) and carboplatin (AUC=4-5, IV, day 1) every 21 days for 4-6 cycles. Dose adjustments may be made based on clinical judgment. Patients who do not experience disease progression or intolerable toxicity will proceed to maintenance therapy with QL1706 (5 mg/kg, IV, day 1) every 21 days. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, investigator decision, loss to follow-up, death, or meeting other protocol-defined criteria for discontinuation. The maximum duration of QL1706 treatment is 24 months, after which continuation will be at the investigator's discretion based on individual benefit-risk assessment.
National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of disease progression according to RECIST v1.1 (as assessed by investigators) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Subjects who are alive without progression at the time of analysis will be censored at the date of the last tumor assessment.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of monitoring at 2 years.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to death from any cause. Subjects who are alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of monitoring at 2 years.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as the proportion of subjects who achieve a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as per RECIST v1.1.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of monitoring at 2 years.
Duration of Response (DoR)
DoR is defined as the time from the first documentation of CR or PR to the first documentation of disease progression or death.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of monitoring at 2 years.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR is defined as the proportion of subjects who achieve CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) as their best overall response.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of monitoring at 2 years.
The incidence of adverse events
Incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events (AEs), graded according to NCI-CTCAE v5.0, including immune-related AEs and serious AEs.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of monitoring at 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.