Benign prostatic enlargement (BPH/BPS) is one of the most common benign diseases in adult men. About 50% of men are affected by the age of 50, and between the ages of 70 and 80 the prevalence rises to 70-80%. There are various surgical procedures available for the treatment of BPH. In this study, we are investigating three surgical procedures which, based on the current data, appear to be relatively equivalent; however, additional data are still needed to substantiate this. The aim of this study is to compare the three surgical methods REZUM vs. HoLEP vs. TUR-P for endoscopic transurethral subvesical de-obstruction with regard to both subjective and objective voiding function, as well as improvements in quality of life and sexual function. The goal of the study is to work out the possible advantages and disadvantages for future patient counseling, thereby defining more precisely the role of these surgical procedures within the armamentarium of urology. This is a single-center, randomized, prospective interventional study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
198
We compare 3 different types of BPH surgery - HoLEP vs. TURP vs. REZUM
Non-inferiority of the surgical techniques in symptom improvement, determined by the change (delta) in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 1 month compared to baseline IPSS.
Time frame: 1 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.