The objective of this multicentric observational study is to evaluate the prognostic influence of adherence or non-adherence to the recommended coronary angiography timeframe (within 24 hours) and the six-month prognosis of the patients.
Primary Objective: To describe the predictive values (sensitivity and specificity) of the timing of coronary angiography after the diagnosis of NSTEMI. Secondary Objective: To evaluate an optimal threshold for the timing of coronary angiography that predicts poor prognosis at 6 months (Composite MACCE criterion including all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, hospitalization for cardiac reasons, stroke) (MACCE = Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebral Events, stroke = cerebrovascular accident). Comparisons: Comparison of severe events at 6 months (Composite MACCE criterion including all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, hospitalization for cardiac reasons, stroke) based on the timing of coronary angiography after the diagnosis of NSTEMI according to recommendations (within 24 hours vs. more than 24 hours). Comparison of severe events at 6 months (all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, hospitalization for cardiac reasons, stroke, considered separately) based on the timing of coronary angiography after the diagnosis of NSTEMI according to recommendations (within 24 hours vs. more than 24 hours). Comparison of severe events at 1 month (Composite MACCE criterion including all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, hospitalization for cardiac reasons, stroke) based on the timing of coronary angiography after the diagnosis of NSTEMI according to recommendations (within 24 hours vs. more than 24 hours). Comparison of the occurrence of severe events (Composite MACCE criterion including all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, hospitalization for cardiac reasons, stroke, treated as survival data) based on the timing of coronary angiography after the diagnosis of NSTEMI according to recommendations (within 24 hours vs. more than 24 hours). Additional Descriptions: Description of the prevalence of patients for whom the recommended timing of coronary angiography is followed. Comparison of the characteristics of patients who underwent coronary angiography within 24 hours versus those who did not (age, LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction), troponin level, creatinine, NYHA class (New York Heart Association heart failure classification)). Comparison of the length of hospitalization based on the timing of coronary angiography.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
407
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, France
Describe the predictive value of the timing of invasive coronary angiography on a composite criteria of overall mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure at 6 months
Sensibility and specificity, positive and negative predictive values
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months
Evaluation of the optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography predicting a negative outcome at 6 months
Using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months
Comparison of the composite criteria of an invasive coronary angiography within 24h and after 24h at 6 months
Composite of overall mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months
Comparison of the composite criteria of an invasive coronary angiography within 24h and after 24h at 1 month
Composite criteria of overall mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure
Time frame: From enrollment to 1 month
Comparison of each element of the composite criteria individually at 6 months of an invasive coronary angiography within 24h and after 24h
Overall mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months
Describe the prevalence of patients receiving an invasive in respect to the timing of the guidelines
Within 24 hours
Time frame: At enrollment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Comparison of major bleeding at 6 months
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months
Length of in-patient stay
Duration in days between the date of admission at the participating hospital and the date of discharge during the index hospitalization
Time frame: 6 months