A Study of NT 201 in Adults With Moderate to Severe Platysma Prominence in Europe (PLATINUM EU)

Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using MAPS-D at Week 2 of MP

MAPS-D is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement.

Time frame: At Week 2 of MP

Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment Using MAPS-D at Week 2 of MP

MAPS-D is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement.

Time frame: At Week 2 of MP

Achievement of at Least a +1 (Somewhat Satisfied) Score Using the Participant's Satisfaction Questionnaire at Week 2 of MP

Participants satisfaction questionnaire responses will be rated on a scale ranging from +3 (very satisfied) to -3 (very dissatisfied). A higher score indicates satisfaction.

Time frame: At Week 2 of MP

Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both the Investigator's Assessment and Participant's Self-Assessment Using MAPS-D at Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

MAPS-D is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement.

Time frame: At Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using MAPS-D at Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

MAPS-D is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement.

Time frame: At Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Self-Assessment Using MAPS-D at Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

MAPS-D is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement.

Time frame: At Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)-Platysmal Bands Based on the Investigator's Assessment at Week 2 of MP

GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 \[very much worse\] to +3 \[very much improved\]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement.

Time frame: At Week 2 of MP

Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score on the GAIS-Platysmal Bands Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment at Week 2 of MP

GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 \[very much worse\] to +3 \[very much improved\]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement.

Time frame: At Week 2 of MP

Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score on the GAIS-Platysmal Bands at Rest Based on the Investigator's Assessment at Week 2 of MP

GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 \[very much worse\] to +3 \[very much improved\]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement.

Time frame: At Week 2 of MP

Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score on the GAIS-Platysmal Bands at Rest Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment at Week 2 of MP

GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 \[very much worse\] to +3 \[very much improved\]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement.

Time frame: At Week 2 of MP

Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score Using the GAIS-Lower Face Contour According to the Investigator's Assessment at Week 2 of MP

GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 \[very much worse\] to +3 \[very much improved\]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement.

Time frame: At Week 2 of MP

Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score Using the GAIS-Lower Face Contour According to the Participant's Self-Assessment at Week 2 of MP

GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 \[very much worse\] to +3 \[very much improved\]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement.

Time frame: At Week 2 of MP