Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common painful condition associated with pain and disability. OA healthcare costs the Danish society 4.6 billion DKK more per year than the non-OA population and we lack evidence on how best to organize and deliver care to reduce costs. Recommended first line treatment for knee OA is exercise with proven effects on symptoms. The current paradigm assumes that exercise needs to be delivered and supervised by a physiotherapist which require patients to attend a clinic at specific times and geographical locations. This is an expensive model of care and creates barriers for people that are active on the labor market or lives in remote areas with long distances to the nearest clinic. In fact, the productivity loss in Denmark associated with OA is estimated to be 12.4 billion DKK per year. While effective on symptoms, the current model with supervised physiotherapy associates with significant shortcomings, and barriers related to patient heterogeneity, costs, accessibility, and work absenteeism. As an alternative, a local fitness center is far more accessible as these are widely dispersed across the country, are accessible daily (including weekends) at all hours, is cheap and offers a wide variety of exercise types, classes, and equipment to accommodate individual preferences. The cost of a fitness center membership is approximately 300 DKK per month and includes exercise ad libitum. In contrast, a typical physiotherapist-supervised exercise program costs 3-4,000 DKK for a 2-month treatment with 2 weekly sessions. Consequently, there is a need to investigate if self-managed exercise in a fitness center is cost-effective as first-line management of knee OA. To answer this question, the present trial aims to compare self-managed exercise in a fitness center to the current standard - supervised exercise. This has the potential to improve quality of care for people with knee OA by adding a cost-effective option for first line management of people with knee OA.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
300
The participants are offered a 6-month membership of a local fitness club at no cost (paid by the trial). They will receive an introduction to the fitness centre and receive instructions from a personal trainer in the centre to create a personalized exercise programme
The particiopants are offered participation in the usual care exercise delivered at municipal rehabilitation centers or private physiotherapy clinics, aat the discretion of the referring doctor.
Pain subscale of the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) questionnaire
Assessed by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscale (patient-reported questionnaire). The KOOS pain subscale consists of 9 questions with a five-point Likert scale scoring system (ranging from 0 (least severe) to 4 (most severe)). The answers are summed and a 0-100 normalized score is calculated with 0 indicating extreme pain and 100 indicating no pain.
Time frame: Change from baseline after 3 months
Health outcome and quality of life survey (EQ-5D-5L)
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized patient-reported instrument for use as a measure of health outcome and quality of life. EQ-5D-5L is designed for self-completion by respondents and is ideally suited for use in surveys.
Time frame: Change from baseline after 3 months
Patient Global Assessment of disease impact (PGA)
Patient-reported degree of patient's perceived impact of their knee OA on their overall life will be obtained using a 100 mm analogue scale (VAS) with anchors: 0=" No impact" and 100 = "Worst imaginable impact".
Time frame: Change from baseline after 3 months
KOOS Function subscale
Assessed by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) physical function subscale (patient-reported questionnaire). The KOOS physical function subscale consists of 17 questions with a five-point Likert scale scoring system (ranging from 0 (least severe) to 4 (most severe)). The answers are summed and a 0-100 normalized score is calculated with 0 indicating extreme functional impairment and 100 indicating no functional impairment.
Time frame: Change from baseline after 3 months
KOOS quality of Life (QOL) subscale
Assessed by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) knee related quality of life subscale (patient-reported questionnaire) The KOOS knee related quality of life subscale consists of 4 questions with a five-point Likert scale scoring system (ranging from 0 (least severe) to 4 (most severe)). The answers are summed and a 0-100 normalized score is calculated with 0 indicating extremely poor knee related quality of life pain and 100 indicating very good knee related quality of life .
Time frame: Change from baseline after 3 months
OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria
Number of treatment responders according to the OMERACT-OARSI response criteria. A participant is classified as a responder if at least 1of the following 2 conditions is observed: 1. In either pain (KOOS pain subscale) or function (KOOS function subscale), a high improvement in the subscale, where high improvement in a subscale is achieved if there is both a \>50% improvement from Baseline and an absolute change from Baseline of \>20 points (0-100 scale), OR 2. Improvement in at least two of the following three: * Improvement in pain (KOOS pain subscale) defined as \>20% improvement from Baseline and an absolute change from Baseline of \>10 points (0-100 scale). * Improvement in function (KOOS function subscale) defined as \>20% improvement from Baseline and an absolute change from Baseline of \> 10 points (0-100 scale). * Improvement in patient's global assessment defined as \>20% improvement from Baseline and an absolute change from Baseline of \>10 mm (0-100 scale).
Time frame: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.