Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

Hospital de Terrassa95 enrolled

Overview

To evaluate whether patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA achieve better clinical-functional, radiological, and satisfaction outcomes compared with those undergoing the conventional technique, and whether operative time and complications do not increase significantly

To compare clinical, functional, quality-of-life, and radiological outcomes between robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) and conventional total knee arthroplasty (C-TKA).

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Knee Arthroplasty, Total Robotic Assisted Arthroplasty Arthropathy of Knee

Interventions

Conventional total knee replacementPROCEDURE

Knee replacement without robotic technology

Robotic TKRPROCEDURE

Total knee replacement WITH robotic technology

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 54 YearsMax age: 85 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with knee arthropaty recquiring TKR Exclusion Criteria: * Cognitive disease * Deformity greater than 15º of varus or 10º of valgus * Postraumatic arthritis * Inflamatory disease * Other than "Persona PS" implant design * Previus surgery

Locations (1)

Hospital de Terrassa - Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa

Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

IKDC

standardized international system for documenting and evaluating knee problems. The IKDC Subjective Knee Form is a patient-reported outcome measure that was developed to assess both surgical and non-surgical outcomes across a wide range of knee conditions and treatment approaches.

Time frame: 2 years follow up after surgery

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.