compare the efficacy of High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in managing COVID 19 pneumonic patients with acute type 1 respiratory failure
A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted on 108 patients with COVID 19 pneumonia with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure at Mansoura University Hospitals to compare the efficacy of High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in managing COVID 19 pneumonic patients with acute type 1 respiratory failure, focusing on the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and 28-day mortality. Patients were randomized into two equal groups: HVNI group and CPAP group. Baseline characteristics, respiratory parameters, and clinical outcomes were recorded.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
108
COVID 19 Pneumonic Patients with Acute Type 1 Respiratory Failure received High Velocity Nasal Insufflation
COVID 19 Pneumonic Patients with Acute Type 1 Respiratory Failure received Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Mohamed AbdElmoniem
Al Mansurah, Egypt
Correction of hypoxia in COVID 19 Pneumonic Patients with Acute Type 1 Respiratory Failure
assessment of efficacy of High Velocity Nasal Insufflation versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in COVID 19 Pneumonic Patients with Acute Type 1 Respiratory Failure
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.