This phase I trial evaluates whether adding Pedmark to standard of care cisplatin-based chemotherapy reduces drug-induced ear damage (ototoxicity) in men with stage II-III testicular germ cell tumors that have spread from where they first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Cisplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity remains a major concern in adult patients with germ cell tumors as nearly four out of five patients develop hearing loss after treatment. Cisplatin is thought to cause ear damage by the production of chemically reactive molecules called reactive oxygen species. These molecules can cause damage when their levels get too high. Pedmark may reduce the negative side effects of cisplatin by neutralizing these reactive molecules. Pedmark has been approved for reducing the risk of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in pediatric patients and older patients with solid tumors that haven't spread to other parts of the body. Adding Pedmark to cisplatin-based chemotherapy treatment may reduce ototoxicity in adult men with stage I-III testicular metastatic germ cell tumors.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Evaluate the incidence of clinically meaningful ototoxicity in adults with metastatic germ cell tumor (GCT) receiving sodium thiosulfate anhydrous (Pedmark) plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared to those receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the incidence of high-frequency ototoxicity (affecting frequencies within 8000-12,500 Hz) between adults in both arms. II. Assess the severity and progression of ototoxicity between adults in both arms. III. Determine the safety and tolerability of Pedmark plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared to cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone. IV. Examine the efficacy of Pedmark plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared to cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the incidence of tinnitus between adults in both arms. II. Disease assessment 6 months post-primary treatment in both arms. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive cisplatin intravenously (IV) over 60 minutes on days 1-5 or 2-5 of each standard of care (SOC) cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days for 3-4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the trial. ARM II: Patients receive cisplatin IV over 60 minutes on days 1-5 or 2-5 of each SOC cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen cycle. Patients also receive Pedmark IV over 30 minutes, 6 hours after each SOC cisplatin infusion, on days 1-5 or 2-5 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days for 3-4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and/or MRI throughout the trial. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days, every 3 months for 1 year and then per SOC for year 2.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
44
Ancillary studies
Given IV
Undergo CT
Undergo MRI
Given IV
City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, United States
RECRUITINGIncidence of clinically meaningful ototoxicity
Will compare the proportion of patients who experience clinically meaningful ototoxicity between adults with germ cell tumor (GCT) receiving Pedmark plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared to those receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone. Clinically meaningful ototoxicity is defined by a \> 20 decibel (dB) threshold shift at a single frequency, a \> 10 dB shift at two adjacent frequencies, or a change to "no response" at three consecutive frequencies as long as these frequencies fall between 250-8000 hertz (Hz) which impacts speech understanding. The corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) will be constructed using the Clopper-Pearson exact method. The proportion of patients who develop clinically meaningful ototoxicity will be compared between arms using a one-sided Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: Up to 6 months post-treatment
Incidence of high-frequency ototoxicity
Will compare the proportion of patients who experience high-frequency ototoxicity between adults with GCT receiving Pedmark plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared to those receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone. High frequency ototoxicity is defined by a \> 20 dB threshold shift at a single frequency, a \> 10 dB shift at two adjacent frequencies, or a change to "no response" at three consecutive frequencies as long as these frequencies fall between 8000-12,00 Hz. Will be estimated with 95% CIs by the Clopper-Pearson exact method. The proportion of patients who develop high-frequency ototoxicity will be compared between arms using a one-sided Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: Up to 6 months post-treatment
Degree of ototoxicity
Audiometry results between adults with GCT receiving Pedmark plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy will be compared to those receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone. This will be decided by the audiologist per World Health Organization classification. Longitudinal changes in degree of ototoxicity will be summarized descriptively and analyzed using repeated-measures models to compare changes from baseline across time points between treatment arms.
Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment
Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
Will evaluate the rate of adverse events per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 in adults with GCT receiving Pedmark plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared to those receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone. The safety evaluation will be based on all patients that received at least one dose of the drug and will include AEs, serious AEs, and changes from baseline in laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and physical examinations. Summaries will be provided overall and by treatment group. The number and percentage of subjects reporting will be summarized overall and by CTCAE grade. All patients will be evaluable for toxicity from the time of their first treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy ± Pedmark.
Time frame: Up to 6 months post-treatment
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Will be assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The difference in PFS between treatment arms will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with survival curves generated for each group. Statistical comparison of PFS between arms will be conducted using the log-rank test.
Time frame: From start of treatment to time of progressive disease or death, assessed up to 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.