Implementing a Mobile Health Application for Women Veterans With Urinary Incontinence (MyHealtheBladder): Function QUERI 3.0

Overview

Implementing a Mobile Health Application for Women Veterans with Urinary Incontinence (MyHealtheBladder): Function QUERI 3.0 aims to compare implementation approaches while also gathering information on clinical effects of the Evidence-Based Program (EBP) in its new context and focusing on equitable reach (extent to which the program serves all members of its intended audience). The overall goal is to implement, evaluate, and sustain MyHealtheBladder in 20 VA facilities using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid study framework and parallel cluster randomized trial (CRT) design.

Background/Purpose. Urinary incontinence (UI) is a highly prevalent condition among women, especially as they age, and can directly impair quality of life, daily function, and long-term independence. Evidence-based behavioral management approaches are first-line treatment for UI; these include treatments such as pelvic floor muscle training, fluid management, and bladder control and voiding strategies. Despite being prevalent and burdensome, UI is often unrecognized and undertreated. MyHealtheBladder (MHB) is an interactive mobile health application designed to deliver evidence-based behavioral self-management instruction specifically for Women Veterans (WV). In a multi-site RCT (VA IIR HX002827) conducted in VA (n=286) comparing MHB to video visits via VA Video Connect (VVC) delivered by a trained Continence Care provider, MHB resulted in equivalent or greater improvements in UI symptoms and satisfaction compared with VVC. Engagement in MHB was high, with 70% retention and an average of 58 miles saved per Veteran. MHB does not require a clinical visit and has the potential to scale across other VA facilities and generate healthcare savings while maintaining comparable patient-level outcomes to individual clinical encounters. Objectives. The investigators aim to develop scalable approaches for implementing and sustaining use of MyHealtheBladder in clinical settings. Additionally, they will assess the reach of MyHealtheBladder when delivered through the Foundational arm compared to an enhanced-implementation strategy, the REACH (Reach Equity And Collective Health) arm. Key questions. How can the REACH arm be optimized to implement MHB across all patients who would benefit? What are shareholder perspectives on refinements needed for MHB foundational activities, as well as strategies to enhance equitable reach? To address the question "Are there differences in implementation outcomes (reach \[primary\], patient engagement, time to adoption) between arms?", the investigators will use generalized linear models to examine the effect of foundational vs. REACH on implementation outcomes of reach and patient engagement at 12 and 18 months (primary). Average time to adoption will be compared between study arms. Methodology. To evaluate implementation, the investigators will randomize sites (n=20) 1:1 to either the foundational arm or REACH arm. The investigators will use generalized linear models to examine the effect of foundational vs. REACH on implementation outcomes of reach and patient engagement at 18 months.