This study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of Efimosfermin Alfa for participants with known or suspected MASH with fibrosis consistent with stage F2 or F3.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
1,250
Efimosfermin Alfa will be administered
Placebo will be administered
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGGSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGGSK Investigational Site
Ocala, Florida, United States
Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs by severity
Time frame: At Week 52
Number of participants with TEAEs leading to discontinuation and TEAEs leading to discontinuation by severity
Time frame: At Week 52
Number of participants with Grade 3 and Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities
Time frame: At Week 52
Absolute Change from Baseline in enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score
The ELF score will be calculated using a published algorithm combining the values of a set of extracellular matrix markers. The ELF score is used as a prognostic marker for disease progression: ELF score less than (\<) 9.8: Low risk of progression, ELF score 9.8 to \<11.3: Moderate risk of progression and ELF score greater than or equal to (\>=) 11.3: High risk of progression.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Percent Change from Baseline in ELF score
The ELF score will be calculated using a published algorithm combining the values of a set of extracellular matrix markers. The ELF score is used as a prognostic marker for disease progression: ELF score \<9.8: Low risk of progression, ELF score 9.8 to \<11.3: Moderate risk of progression and ELF score \>=11.3: High risk of progression.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Number of participants achieving an improvement in ELF score greater than equal to 0.5
The ELF score will be calculated using a published algorithm combining the values of a set of extracellular matrix markers. The ELF score is used as a prognostic marker for disease progression: ELF score \<9.8: Low risk of progression, ELF score 9.8 to \<11.3: Moderate risk of progression and ELF score \>=11.3: High risk of progression.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, United States
RECRUITINGGSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, United States
RECRUITINGGSK Investigational Site
Waco, Texas, United States
RECRUITINGTime frame: At Week 52
Absolute Change from Baseline in vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE)- liver stiffness measurement (LSM) scores
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Percent Change from Baseline in VCTE- LSM scores
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Number of participants achieving a change from Baseline in VCTE-LSM >=30 percentage (%)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Absolute Change from Baseline in magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) scores in the subset of participants
MRE is a non-invasive imaging technique that combine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning with low-frequency mechanical vibrations to measure the stiffness of liver. MRE scores \<2.5 is normal, 2.5 - 3.0 Normal or inflammation, 3.0 - 3.5 Stage 1-2 fibrosis, 3.5 - 4.0 Stage 2-3 fibrosis, 4.0 - 5.0 Stage 3-4 fibrosis and \> 5.0 Stage 4 fibrosis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Percent Change from Baseline in the subset of participants with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) scores
MRE is a non-invasive imaging technique that combine MRI scanning with low-frequency mechanical vibrations to measure the stiffness of liver. MRE scores \<2.5 is normal, 2.5 - 3.0 Normal or inflammation, 3.0 - 3.5 Stage 1-2 fibrosis, 3.5 - 4.0 Stage 2-3 fibrosis, 4.0 - 5.0 Stage 3-4 fibrosis and \> 5.0 Stage 4 fibrosis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Absolute Change from Baseline in hepatic fat fraction (HFF) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF)
HFF is the percentage of fat in the liver measured by MRI proton density fat fraction technique, which ranges from 0-75%. Greater than 5% is considered extra fat in the liver.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Percent Change from Baseline in HFF by MRI-PDFF
HFF is the percentage of fat in the liver measured by MRI proton density fat fraction technique, which ranges from 0-75%. Greater than 5% is considered extra fat in the liver.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Absolute Change from Baseline in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (International units per liter)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Absolute Change from Baseline in ALT and AST ratio (ALT/AST)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Percent Change from Baseline in ALT and AST (International units per liter)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Percent Change from Baseline in ALT and AST ratio (ALT/AST)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Number of participants achieving ALT and HFF normalization
Time frame: At Week 52
Number of participants achieving HFF less than equal to (<=) 5%
HFF is the percentage of fat in the liver measured by MRI proton density fat fraction technique, which ranges from 0-75%. Less than or equal to 5% is considered normal (no significant fatty infiltration (steatosis) in the liver.
Time frame: At Week 52
Change from Baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in body weight for all participants(kilograms)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in fasting total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)- cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides (Millimoles per liter)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Number of Participants with antidrug and anti-fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) antibodies (ADA) at Week 52
Time frame: At Week 52
Maximum serum drug concentrations (Cmax) of efimosfermin alfa
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) of efimosfermin alfa
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Average serum drug concentration (Cavg) of efimosfermin alfa
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Serum concentration of study drug at the end of the dosing interval (Ctrough) of efimosfermin alfa
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Exposure-response relationship for efimosfermin alfa
To evaluate the correlation between pharmacokinetics (PK) derived from plasma concentrations, and biomarker responses, safety, and efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52