This is a pivotal, global, prospective, cross-sectional, multicentric clinical investigation designed to explore a non-invasive, reliable alternative to invasive, catheter-based hemodynamic assessments, which are associated with procedural risks and limited applicability in certain participant populations.
CHF, as defined by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association, is "a complex clinical syndrome that results from any structural or functional impairment of ventricular filling or ejection of blood." These patients will often develop congestion that may require urgent hospitalization, especially if pulmonary congestion is present. However, congestion can be difficult to assess, especially when symptoms are mild, or in patients nearing discharge from an HF hospitalization.8 Increased cardiac filling pressures, including the CVP, often silently precede the appearance of congestive symptoms by days resulting in hepatic congestion. Invasive methods, such as RHC, remain the gold standard method of measuring CVP, offering accurate and direct hemodynamic data. However, RHC requires specialized training and invasive vascular access and is associated with procedural risks including bleeding, infection, arrhythmia, and patient discomfort. Echocardiography is the most common non-invasive adjunct tool for estimating CVP and assessing cardiac function. It evaluates indirect parameters, right atrial size, IVC diameter, and collapsibility to detect elevated CVP. LSM by VCTE™ has emerged as a novel non-invasive approach to detecting elevated CVP indirectly. Liver elastography relies on imaging techniques to assess LSM, with high values equating to increased stiffness. While this was developed to assess fibrosis in chronic liver diseases, LSM also reflects increased CVP and hepatic congestion. Multiple studies have shown promising correlations between increased liver stiffness and invasively measured CVP, indicating a potential clinical strategy for detecting hemodynamic congestion non-invasively. Given these considerations, the current clinical investigation aims to evaluate the 13.3 kPa cutoff performance of LSM with FibroScan (Echosens, Paris, France) to diagnose elevated CVP (\>10 mm Hg).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
149
At Day 0: 1 FibroScan examination to collect Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM)
at Day 0: Right-sided Heart Catheterization (RHC) to measure Central Venous Pressure (CVP)
at Day 0 assessment of cardiac function
Keck Medicine of USC-Norris Healthcare Center - Transplant Clinic
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneota, Minnesota, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Proportion of individuals with elevated CVP (>10 mm Hg) who are correctly identified by LSM (cutoff of 13.3 kPa) [Sensitivity]
Sensitivity (true positive rate) = TP / (TP + FN)
Time frame: at Day 0
Proportion of individuals without elevated CVP (>10 mm Hg) who are correctly identified by LSM (cutoff of 13.3 kPa) [Specificity]
Specificity (1 - false negative rate) = TN / (TN + FP)
Time frame: at Day 0
Proportion of individuals correctly identified by LSM (Youden index) for the diagnosis of elevated CVP (>10 mm Hg)
Time frame: at Day 0
Proportion of individuals correctly identified by LSM (Youden index) for the diagnosis of abnormal IVC diameter
Time frame: at Day 0
Logistic regression model to identify clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic factors associated with LSM/CVP discordance.
Time frame: at Day 0
Correlation between LSM and echocardiographic parameters evaluated with Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients
* Unit of measure: Pearson or Spearman coefficient * Measurement tool: linear regression
Time frame: at Day 0
Correlation between LSM and NT-proBNP evaluated with Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients
* Unit of measure: Pearson or Spearman coefficient * Measurement tool: linear regression
Time frame: at Day 0
Correlation between LSM and CA-125 evaluated with Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
At Day0: To assess baseline organ function that may impact participant safety, and blood samples for clinical laboratory tests
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Clinical Heart and Vascular Center - West Campus Building 3 Location
Dallas, Texas, United States
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Rennes - Hopital de Pontchaillou
Rennes, Ile Et Vilaine, France
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC) - Klinik fuer Herz-, Thorax- und Gefaesschirurgie
Berlin, Germany
Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastow Slaskich we Wroclawiu, Instytut Chorob Serca
Wroclaw, Basse-Silésie, Poland
* Unit of measure: Pearson or Spearman coefficient * Measurement tool: linear regression
Time frame: at Day 0
Correlation between LSM and clinical parameters evaluated with Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients
* Unit of measure: Pearson or Spearman coefficient * Measurement tool: linear regression
Time frame: at Day 0
Proportion of individuals correctly identified for the diagnosis of elevated CVP (>10 mm Hg) compared between LSM, echocardiography parameter and NT-proBNP using DeLong's test for correlated ROC curves
Time frame: at Day 0