This study aims to explore the efficacy of high intensity transcranial alternating current stimulation on individuals with alcohol use disorders. Utilizing a one-arm pilot study design, participants will undergo transcranial alternating current stimulation.
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is become a major social and public health problem in China. Craving for alcohol and compulsive drinking behavior are the main symptom of AUD. Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between cognitive dysfunction and prefrontal-ventral striatum pathway. Studies have shown that abnormal phase synchronization and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) induced the impairment of cognition, and High-Intensity transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (HI-tACS) could improve executive-control function thus by adjusting the abnormal synchronization. However, it has not been verified among AUD patients. The investigators assume that tACS could improve AUD patients' executive-control function by adjusting the synchronization patterns and enhancing the functional connectivity of the prefrontal-ventral striatum pathway. This study intends to test the effect of HI-tACS treatment. Three-month follow-up assessment will be conducted to test the changing of the craving and alcohol use behavior. This study will provide a practical and theoretical basis for developing a novel treatment for AUD.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
18
A 40-minute 15mA transcranial alternating current stimulus intervention with 77.5 Hz of real stimulus is conducted twice a day (at least 3 hours apart) for a total of 10 days in the intervention group of AUD.
Shanghai Mental Health Center
Shanghai, China
The change of alcohol craving
Alcohol craving will be measured by the alcohol craving Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The total score of VAS ranged from 0 to 10, in which higher scores mean a higher level of alcohol craving.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention
The change of drinking behavior
Questions including monetary loss, time, frequency and interval of drinking will be answered by patients to quantify their gambling behavior.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention
The change of drinking urge
Alcohol craving will be assessed using the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ). The total score of AUQ ranges from 8 to 56, with higher scores indicating stronger urges to consume alcohol.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention
The change of abstinence symptom
Alcohol withdrawal symptoms will be evaluated using the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, revised version (CIWA-Ar). The total score of CIWA-Ar ranges from 0 to 67, where higher scores indicate more severe alcohol withdrawal symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention
Change of the compulsive drinking behavior
Compulsive drinking behavior will be measured by the short form of the Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS). The total score of OCDS ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores reflecting greater obsessive-compulsive thoughts and behaviors related to alcohol use.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention
Side effects of the modulation
Side effects will be assessed using the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS). The scale evaluates the presence and severity of adverse reactions, with higher scores indicating more significant side effects.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Change of depressive symptoms.
Depressive symptoms will be measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17). The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention
Change of anxiety symptoms
Anxiety symptoms will be assessed using the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14). The total score ranges from 0 to 56, where higher scores reflect greater anxiety severity.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention
Change of the sleep quality
Sleep quality will be evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention
Change of the self-control ability
Self-control ability will be measured using the Self-Control Scale (SCS). Higher scores of SCS indicate better self-regulation and impulse control.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention
Change of the risky decision-making performance
Risky decision-making performance will be assessed using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Higher average pumps in the BART indicate greater risk-taking propensity. Feedback-related negativity (FRN) will be recorded using electroencephalography (EEG), with larger amplitude typically reflecting enhanced sensitivity to negative feedback. Pig dice game will be administered during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning to assess risk-taking decision-making. Higher frequency of continued dice rolls indicates greater risk propensity. Neural activity in the prefrontal cortex and striatum will be analyzed, with increased activation typically associated with risk evaluation and reward processing.
Time frame: Baseline, two weeks after the intervention.
Change of the inhibitory control performance
Stop-signal task (SST) will be employed to measure inhibitory control. Longer stop-signal reaction times (SSRT) indicate poorer response inhibition. The N2/P3 components will be recorded using electroencephalography (EEG), with enhanced N2 amplitude and reduced P3 amplitude typically reflecting greater cognitive conflict and inhibitory processing efficiency, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline, two weeks after the intervention.
Change of the resting state neural activity.
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) will be used to assess intrinsic brain connectivity. Lower amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and reduced functional connectivity (FC) within the default mode network (DMN) may reflect altered neural efficiency. Resting-state electroencephalography (rsEEG) will be employed to measure spontaneous neural oscillations. Enhanced theta/beta ratio and reduced alpha power may indicate compromised regulatory control and cortical arousal, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline, two weeks after the intervention.