The aim of this study is to elaborate on the effectiveness of recruitment maneuver by airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) as an open lung ventilatory strategy in comparison with PRVC mode in lung protective strategy regarding improvement of LUS score and P/F ratio in patients with severe ARDS
Acute Respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the most severe form of acute lung injury (ALI) which still has high rates of morbidity and mortality. Mechanical ventilation is still the backbone of patient management. One of the newly developed and successfully used strategies in patients with ARDS is lung protective strategies (LPS). However, use of low tidal volumes during LPS may be associated with atelectasis due to decreased alveolar inflation. In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients, a recruitment strategy combines recruitment maneuvers (RMs) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent atelectrauma. Recruitment maneuvers are a voluntary strategy for effecting a temporary increase in trans-pulmonary pressure (PL), which in turn should reopen those alveolar units that are either poorly aerated or not aerated at all. PEEP may decrease ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) by keeping those lung regions open that may otherwise collapse The Open lung approach is another ventilatory strategy complementary with the concept of protective ventilation. Lachmann was the first who introduced the open lung concept combining a lung recruitment maneuver (RM) with a sufficient level of PEEP. Recruitment maneuvers minimize the impact of the two known VILI mediators: tidal over distension (i.e., alveoli that receive volume and pressure that exceed their elastic limit) and tidal recruitment (i.e., the repetitive opening and closing of atelectasis during mechanical breathing), Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is one of the newly introduced modes in ARDS management. It is a pressure-controlled mode that uses two levels of pressures with inverted ratio ventilation. Release of airway pressure during APRV simulates expiration while elevated baseline pressure improves oxygenation. One of the advantages of this mode is that it allows spontaneous breathing It is considered an alternative, life-saving modality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who struggle for oxygenation. Compared to the classical ventilation, APRV has been shown to provide lower peak pressure, better oxygenation, less circulatory loss, and better gas exchange without deteriorating the hemodynamic condition of the ARDS patient. This mode is believed to help to achieve the target of opening consolidated lung areas (recruitment) and to prevent repeated opening-closing of alveoli (recruitment). However, there still needs to be more and more proof to support this hypothesis. Recently, it has been proposed that the early use of protective mechanical ventilation with APRV could be used preemptively to prevent the development of ARDS in high-risk patients Lung Ultrasound has favorable features to assess RM due to its high specificity and sensitivity to detect lung collapse together with its non-invasiveness, availability, and simple use at the bedside. Ultrasound also has the capability of providing a differential diagnosis between atelectasis and lung consolidation of other origin such as pneumonia. The bilateral distribution of consolidations, presence of static air bronchograms, images of tidal recruitment within consolidation and absence of a companion pleural effusion strongly support the diagnosis of atelectasis. Furthermore, retrospectively the disappearance of the lung consolidation pattern after a RM confirms the diagnosis Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe life-threatening lung reaction to various forms of injuries that cause hypoxia. it has been demonstrated that mechanical ventilation by lung protection strategy can be provided in patients with ARDS, resulting in better pulmonary function and higher rates of weaning from the ventilator. lung-protective strategy was associated with improved survival in 28 days and a lower rate of barotrauma in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Protective ventilation was not associated with a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
90
bedside lung ultrasound in six lung regions of interest, delineated by a parasternal line, anterior axillary line, posterior axillary line, and paravertebral line, are examined on each side. Each lung region is carefully examined in the longitudinal plane, and each intercostal space present in the region is examined in the transversal plane. The worst ultrasound pattern characterizes the region (regional LUS) using the following grading: 0 = normal aeration; 1 = moderate loss of aeration (interstitial syndrome, defined by multiple spaced B lines, or localized pulmonary edema, defined by coalescent B lines in less than 50% of the intercostal space examined in the transversal plane, or subpleural consolidations); 2 = severe loss of aeration (alveolar edema, defined by diffused coalescent B lines occupying the whole intercostal space); and 3 = complete loss of lung aeration (lung consolidation defined as a tissue pattern with or without air bronchogram)
Ainshams University
Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt
lung ultrasound score
assessment of the lung interstitial tissue by ultrasound Ultrasound patterns at different degrees of lung aeration. 1. Normal lung ultrasound pattern (score = 0). 2. Well-Spaced B lines (moderate loss of aeration; score = 1). 3. Coalescent B lines (severe loss of aeration; score = 2). 4. Consolidated lung (complete loss of aeration; score = 3).
Time frame: 7 days started after mechanical ventilation
P/F Ratio (Pao2/Fio2 Ratio)
ratio between the Partial pressure of Oxygen and the fraction of inspired oxygen Mild ARDS: 200 mmHg \<Pao2/Fio2 \< 300 mmHg Moderate ARDS:100 mmHg \<Pao2/Fio2 \< 200 mmHg Severe ARDS: Pao2/Fio2 \< 100 mmHg
Time frame: 7 days started after mechanical ventilation
Heart rate. (BPM).
heart rate in beat per minute
Time frame: every 24 hours for 7 days after mechanical ventilation
Invasive Mean arterial blood pressure. (mmHG).
mean arterial blood pressure in mmHg
Time frame: every 24 hours for 7 days after mechanical ventilation
Vasopressor-Inotrope score (VIS)
Vasopressor dose monitored daily using Vasopressor-Inotrope score (VIS) calculated as: Vasoactive-Inotropic Score = dopamine dose (µg/kg/min) + dobutamine dose (µg/kg/min) + 100 x adrenaline dose (µg/ kg/ min) + 100 x noradrenaline dose (µg/kg/min) + 10 x milrinone dose (µg/kg/min) + 10.000 x vasopressin dose (U/kg/min)
Time frame: every 24 hours for 7 days after mechanical ventilation
Lung compliance. (mL/cmH2O).
Lung compliance. (mL/cmH2O) calculated as change in tidal volume divided by the change in ventilating pressures
Time frame: every 24 hours for 7 days after mechanical ventilation
Oxygenation index
Oxygenation index calculated as: mean airway pressure \*Fio2\*100) /Pao2
Time frame: every 24 hours for 7 days after mechanical ventilation
Length of stay. (Days)
total Length of stay through study completion, From date of admission until the date of discharge or transfer or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 1 month
Time frame: through study completion, From date of admission until the date of discharge or transfer or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 1 month
Total ventilation days
calculated from date of endotracheal intubation until the date of extubation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 1 month
Time frame: calculated From date of endotracheal intubation until the date of extubation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 1 month
outcome
final outcome of the patient dicharged or improved, transferred or died
Time frame: through study completion, From date of admission until the date of discharge or transfer or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 1 month"
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.