Premature ejaculation (PE) is one of the most common male sexual dysfunctions, often resistant to conventional pharmacological and behavioral treatments. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the safety and efficacy of two minimally invasive treatment options - hyaluronic acid (HA) injection into the glans penis versus botulinum toxin type A injection into the bulbospongiosus muscle - in men with lifelong drug-resistant premature ejaculation. Eighty participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HA or botulinum toxin injection. The primary outcome is change in intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT). Secondary outcomes include changes in Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT), Arabic Index of Premature Ejaculation (AIPE) scores, Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), patient satisfaction, and treatment-related adverse events during a 12-month follow-up period.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
80
Botulinum toxin type A will be reconstituted by diluting 100 units in 10 milliliters of sterile normal saline. Using ultrasound guidance, 5 milliliters will be injected into each side of the bulbospongiosus muscle through a single puncture site while the patient is in the lithotomy position. The aim is to achieve even distribution of the toxin within the muscle fibers to reduce muscular contractions associated with ejaculation.
Two milliliters of 3.5 percent micronized hyaluronic acid gel will be injected into the dermis of the glans penis using the Fanning Technique. The injection will be performed through a single puncture site with a 27-gauge needle, advancing from the tip of the glans toward the coronal sulcus to distribute the gel evenly. Topical anesthetic cream containing lidocaine and prilocaine will be applied for 30 minutes before the procedure.
Change in intravaginal ejaculatory latency time
The duration from vaginal penetration to ejaculation will be recorded using a stopwatch by the patient's partner. The median intravaginal ejaculatory latency time will be calculated for each participant from several intercourse attempts. The change in latency time after treatment compared with baseline will be used to assess treatment efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after intervention
Change in Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) score
The Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool questionnaire will be used to evaluate changes in ejaculatory control and distress levels. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after intervention
Change in Arabic Index of Premature Ejaculation (AIPE) score
The Arabic Index of Premature Ejaculation questionnaire will assess subjective improvement in control, satisfaction, and distress related to ejaculation. Higher scores reflect better control and lower distress.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after intervention
Change in Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) score
The Premature Ejaculation Profile will be used to evaluate treatment-related improvement across four domains: perceived control, personal distress, interpersonal difficulty, and sexual satisfaction.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after intervention
Patient satisfaction score
Participants will rate overall satisfaction with the procedure using a four-point scale (0 = dissatisfied, 1 = slightly satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = very satisfied).
Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.