Individuals with metastatic breast cancer are living longer but often face persistent fatigue, functional decline, and psychological distress. Physical activity is generally safe for this population and may alleviate symptom burden. Yet, limited interventions are tailored to the unique and needs and preferences of this population. This study aims to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a mindfulness- and acceptance-based physical activity program designed to support mental, social, and spiritual well-being among people with metastatic breast cancer. A single group, pretest-posttest trial (N=38) will be conducted to inform scalable strategies to promote active living and enhance quality of life among people with advanced cancer.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
38
This intervention will be delivered over the course of up to 8-12 weeks. It will include: 1. the provision of a wearable physical activity tracker 2. empirically supported behavior change techniques for promoting physical activity 3. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-informed didactic content centered on promoting physical activity 4. a social component with game design elements reflecting acceptance and mindfulness practices (i.e., the ability to share responses to "Weekly Challenges" and view and comment on others' entries).
TSET Health Promotion Research Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
RECRUITINGSemi-structured Interviews
Semi-structured interviews will be used to assess participants' overall experience and their perceptions of the usability, usefulness, and enjoyability of the intervention.
Time frame: Week 9
Perceived ease of use
Face valid questions will be used to determine whether participants found the interventions easy to use. The face valid questions consists of five 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All Easy" (scored as 1) to "Very Easy" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater ease of use.
Time frame: Week 9
Perceived Usefulness
Face valid questions will be used to determine whether participants found the interventions useful. The face valid questions consists of five 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All Useful" (scored as 1) to "Very Useful" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater perceived usefulness.
Time frame: Week 9
Enjoyability - Face Valid Questions
Face valid questions will be used to assess the enjoyability of the interventions in this study. The face valid questions consists of five 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All Enjoyable" (scored as 1) to "Very Enjoyable" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater enjoyability.
Time frame: Week 9
Enjoyability - Interest/Enjoyment Subscale
The interest/enjoyment subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMIe) will be used to assess the enjoyability of the interventions in this study. The IMIe sub-scale consists of seven 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All True" (scored as 1) to "Very True" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater enjoyability.
Time frame: Week 9
Feasibility of the Program - Study Retention
We will assess program feasibility via measurements of study retention. We will compute what percentage of enrolled participant complete post-intervention data collection procedures.
Time frame: Week 9
Feasibility of the Program - Adherence
We will assess program feasibility via measurements of intervention adherence. We will compute what percentage of participants engage with at least 75% of the intervention modules.
Time frame: Week 9
Feasibility of Collecting Biological Samples
We will assess the feasibility of assessing gene expression in the present context by assessing what percentage of enrolled participants provide analyzable data in optional post-intervention blood draws.
Time frame: Week 9
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.