The aim of this study is to evaluate adult intussecption : * Prevalence of benign vs malignant causes. * Distribution by anatomical type. * Clinical presentation patterns. * Diagnostic accuracy of imaging. * Surgical approach and outcomes. * Length of hospital stay, complications, recurrence
Intussusception is a condition characterized by the invagination of one segment of the intestine into another, leading to obstruction and potentially ischemia (1). While intussusception is relatively common in the pediatric population, it is considered a rare clinical entity in adults, accounting for only 1-5% of all cases and approximately 1% of intestinal obstructions in the adult population. The etiology, clinical presentation, and management of adult intussusception differ significantly from pediatric cases, necessitating a distinct clinical approach (2). In contrast to children, where most cases are idiopathic, adult intussusception is commonly associated with an underlying pathological lead point. In approximately 70-90% of adult cases, a structural lesion can be identified as the cause of the intussusception (3). These lesions may be benign or malignant in nature and understanding the incidence of each is important for appropriate diagnosis and treatment planning (4). In general, intussusceptions involving the small intestine are more likely to be caused by benign lesions such as lipomas, polyps, or Meckel's diverticulum, whereas those involving the colon have a higher likelihood of being associated with malignancy, especially primary adenocarcinoma (5). Adult intussusception poses a diagnostic challenge due to its nonspecific and often chronic symptoms, which may include intermittent abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal bleeding, or signs of partial bowel obstruction (6). The advent of advanced imaging techniques, particularly abdominal computed tomography (CT), has improved the preoperative diagnosis of this condition (7). However, surgical exploration remains the definitive diagnostic and therapeutic modality, especially given the high probability of underlying malignancy (8). Despite advancements in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques, there remains a lack of general agreement regarding the optimal management of adult intussusception, particularly concerning the necessity and extent of bowel resection when a benign cause is suspected (9). Moreover, data on the relative incidence of benign versus malignant causes vary widely across regions, institutions, and populations. This study aims to evaluate adult intussecption, prevalence of benign versus malignant causes in AUH.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
35
Adult patient diagnosed with intussusception will undergo surgical resection of affected bowel segment under general anathesia . the resected specimens will be sent for histopathological evalution to determine the underlying cause , whether benign (e.g lipoma , polyp )or malignant (e.g adenocarcinama , lymphoma ). operative finding , postoperative outcome , and pathology results will be recorded and analyzed
Department of general surgury Assiut uneversity hospital
Asyut, Egypt
prevalence of benign versus malignant causes
Histopathological examination of resected bowel specimens will determine whether the cause of intussusception is benign (e.g., lipoma, polyp) or malignant (e.g., adenocarcinoma, lymphoma). The frequency and percentage of each category will be calculated
Time frame: 2 weeks after surgical resection
Correlation between preoperative imaging findings and histopathological results Description
Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative imaging (CT scan findings such as target sign, mass lesion) in predicting benign or malignant pathology
Time frame: At the time of diagnosis (preoperative period )
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.