The goal of this observational study is to compare two localization methods used before surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): mixed reality (MR) and ultrasound-guided. Main Research Question Before SSRF, does MR help surgeons mark rib fracture locations more accurately (in centimeters) and faster than ultrasound-guided? Participants After the study ends, all participants will keep follow-up at the thoracic surgery clinic. The team will record wound healing and pain scores for use in the observational study.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
30
Rib fracture localization accuracy (cm)
Definition: For each participant and each method (mixed reality \[MR; OpVerse\] and ultrasound), accuracy is the absolute linear distance (cm) between the preoperative skin mark and the intraoperatively identified center of the fracture after exposure. Measurement: After skin incision and minimal soft-tissue dissection to expose the fracture line, the surgeon measures the shortest distance from the skin mark to the fracture center with a sterile ruler, recorded to 0.1 cm. Analysis note: Accuracy will be summarized per method, and a within-subject difference (MR minus ultrasound) will be calculated. Procedural note: If exposure is inadequate, the incision may be extended at the surgeon's discretion to safely perform SSRF; this does not change the measurement definition.
Time frame: Intraoperative assessment during the index SSRF procedure (immediately after fracture exposure and before plate fixation).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.