This study will test the control and measurements of a new system for airway support in healthy volunteers. The goals of the study are to evaluate how accurately the system can stabilize airway pressure to a desired level, evaluate the accuracy of the system's reported volume of each breath (tidal volume), evaluate the accuracy of the system's reported respiratory rate, evaluate the accuracy of exhaled carbon dioxide monitoring with a standard carbon dioxide monitor when the novel PAP system is used, and evaluate general comfort of the volunteers while using the system.
Sedation procedures involve administering drugs to patients that reduce awareness and pain without complete loss of consciousness. A common side effect of these drugs is partial or complete obstruction of the airway by the airway tissue, inhibiting the flow of oxygen to the lungs. Research has shown that this risk can be effectively reduced by administering PAP therapy during sedation, which involves directing air flow into a tight-fitting mask over the patient's nostrils and/or mouth. However, non-invasive ventilators used for administering PAP therapy are expensive and large, and often not available in areas of the hospital where sedation procedures take place. The investigators have developed a small and low-cost novel PAP system for use in sedation procedures that controls airway pressure to desired levels (a feature that is generally only available in larger and higher-cost devices), provides estimates for tidal volumes (generally only available with a non-invasive ventilator), provides respiratory rate estimates, and allows for more accurate monitoring of exhaled carbon dioxide with a standard carbon dioxide monitor using a novel approach that to the investigator's knowledge has not been published. The goal of investigator's study is to demonstrate the accuracy of these features in human subjects. The system is much smaller and less expensive than a non-invasive ventilator, provides enhanced respiratory monitoring, and has the potential to be a practical alternative that would make PAP therapy during sedation much more feasible. The investigator's evaluation will primarily include evaluating the investigator's system's performance against an FDA cleared commercial respiratory monitor to verify accuracy. The investigators anticipate that the investigator's system will automatically adjust oxygen flow to maintain a desired airway pressure even in the presence of variables such as mask leak and patient inhalation flow. The investigators also anticipate that the investigator's system will provide tidal volume estimates within 15% of the respiratory monitor reference measurement, as well as respiratory rate estimates that closely match the respiratory monitor. The investigator's system employs a method that detects when the patient exhales and removes mask pressure during exhalation, and the investigators anticipate that this will result in improved comfort for the patient, as well as improved carbon dioxide monitoring accuracy, since removing flow during exhalation reduces dilution of the expired gas sample that is used for measuring exhaled carbon dioxide levels.
Airway pressure support through the investigational device.
Tidal Volume Accuracy
The mean and standard deviation of the percent difference in tidal volume measurement between our PAP system and the respiratory monitor
Time frame: During the intervention
Respiratory Rate
The average respiratory rate reported by the respiratory monitor and rate reported by the PAP system for each volunteer will be compared. The average difference for each volunteer will be calculated, and a 95% confidence interval will be constructed, with the ideal mean difference being zero with low variance.
Time frame: During the intervention
EtCO2
End-tidal carbon dioxide measurements at 10 cmH2O of mask pressure will be compared between when the system turned off flow during exhalation and when delivering flow throughout the entire breath. We anticipate that end-tidal CO2 levels will read lower when flow is delivered continuously during exhalation because of dilution of the expired gas, and this will be demonstrated by calculating the average difference in end-tidal CO2 between these two approaches.
Time frame: During the intervention
Mask Pressure Control Accuracy
The measured pressure in the mask compared to the set pressure in the 50 milliseconds immediately preceding inhalation will be assessed for evaluating pressure control. Average differences at each set pressure will be calculated. We anticipate these numbers to be less than 1 cmH2O.
Time frame: During the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
25