This research study is being done to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of elranatamab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone versus the combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone for patients with newly diagnosed, transplant ineligible/deferred multiple myeloma.
The ELDORADO trial is a phase 2, randomized, open label, multicenter study that will enroll approximately 160 patients (10 patient safety run and 150 patients for randomization) to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of elranatamab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone versus the standard combination of daratumumab and hyaluronidase, lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone in newly diagnosed, transplant ineligible/deferred multiple myeloma patients. Pfizer, Inc. is supporting this research by providing the study drug, elranatamab, and funding for research activities. Patients will receive treatment for 24 cycles. For patients who meet certain testing parameters, some patients may be able to discontinue treatment and be observed. Other patients may continue with the treatment that they have been receiving until disease progression. Patients may discontinue treatment if they experience unacceptable adverse events, their condition changes rendering them unacceptable for further treatment, they experience intercurrent illness that prevents further administration of treatment, they demonstrate an inability or unwillingness to comply with the medication regimen and/or documentation requirements, or they withdraw from the study. Patients will be followed for a period of 5 years from when the last participant discontinues treatment. The majority of this follow up will not be in person and will be through review of the patients' charts. The U.S. FDA has not approved the combination of elranatamab or daratumumab with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (elra-RVd lite or dara-RVd lite) as a treatment for any disease. Elranatamab is a bispecific antibody, meaning it can attach to two different things at the same time. Elranatamab, specifically, connects to cancer cells, as well as to a certain type of immune cells, called T cells, to help the immune system attack and destroy the cancer cells. Daratumumab recognizes and attaches to a protein found on the surface of cancer cells, called CD38. This aids the immune system in identifying and destroying cancer cells. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug. Immunomodulatory drugs help control or adjust how the immune system works, whether it is too weak or too aggressive to more effectively fight infections and cancers. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor, meaning it blocks proteasome in cells. Proteasome aids in cell growth and development. When proteasome is blocked, damaged proteins build up, stressing a cancer cell, and eventually cause cell death. Dexamethasone is a glucocorticoid (a substance that stops inflammation caused by immune system disorders) that has shown significant activity in myeloma. It is believed to aid in anti-myeloma effects, which may lead to the destruction of myeloma cancer cells.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
160
Elranatamab is a bispecific IgG2 kappa monoclonal antibody.
Daratumumab is an immunoglobulin G1 kappa human monoclonal antibody against CD38 antigen.
Lenalidomide is a thalidomide analogue and an immunomodulatory agent with antiangiogenic properties.
Bortezomib for injection is a small molecule proteosome inhibitor.
Dexamethasone is a synthetic adrenocortical steroid.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Proportion Patients who test Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) at 10^-5 after 4 Treatment Cycles
Evaluated at 1 x 10\^-5 using next generation sequencing (NGS) to detect clonal sequences. The proportions will be compared using the Cochran-Mantzel-Haenszel test, stratified by the randomization stratification factors. A one-sided significance level of 0.05 will be used. Patients without successful baseline minimal residual disease (MRD) testing will not be evaluated for MRD response. Proportion patients who test negative for MRD at 10\^-5 after 4 treatment cycles will be compared between the elran-RVd lite arm and the dara-RVd lite arm.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days) to Day 28 of Cycle 4.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from randomization to disease progression or death from any cause. PFS distributions will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS will be compared between the elran-RVd lite arm and the dara-RVd lite arm.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days) to documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (up to 5 years). Patients who have not progressed or died are censored at the date last known progression-free.
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival (OS) is the time from start of treatment to death due to any cause. OS distributions will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. OS will be compared between the elran-RVd lite arm and the dara-RVd lite arm.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days) to documentation of death due to any cause or censored at the date last known alive, up to 5 years from study registration.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Overall response rate (ORR) is the proportion of patients achieving partial response or better, along with very good partial response and complete response per the International Myeloma Working Group Response Criteria (IMWG). All IMWG response categories will require one confirmation. ORR will be compared between the elran-RVd lite arm and the dara-RVd lite arm.
Time frame: Day of initiation of first response to the first documentation of disease progression or death, up to 5 years after registration. Patients who have not progressed or died are censored at the date last known progression-free.
Proportion Patients who test Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) at 10^-5 after 12 Treatment Cycles
Evaluated at 1 x 10\^-5 using next generation sequencing (NGS) to detect clonal sequences. The proportions will be compared using the Cochran-Mantzel-Haenszel test, stratified by the randomization stratification factors. A one-sided significance level of 0.05 will be used. Patients without successful baseline minimal residual disease (MRD) testing will not be evaluated for MRD response. Proportion patients who test negative for MRD at 10\^-5 after 12 treatment cycles will be compared between the elran-RVd lite arm and the dara-RVd lite arm.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days) to Day 28 of Cycle 12.
Proportion Patients who test Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) at 10^-6 after 4 Treatment Cycles
Evaluated at 1 x 10\^-6 using next generation sequencing (NGS) to detect clonal sequences. The proportions will be compared using the Cochran-Mantzel-Haenszel test, stratified by the randomization stratification factors. A one-sided significance level of 0.05 will be used. Patients without successful baseline minimal residual disease (MRD) testing will not be evaluated for MRD response. Proportion patients who test negative for MRD at 10\^-6 after 4 treatment cycles will be compared between the elran-RVd lite arm and the dara-RVd lite arm.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days) to Day 28 of Cycle 4.
Proportion Patients who Remain Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) at 10^-5 for 12 Months
12-month sustained MRD is defined as two MRD negative results a minimum of 12 months apart (with a window of four weeks). Evaluated at 1 x 10\^-5 using next generation sequencing (NGS) to detect clonal sequences. The proportions will be compared using the Cochran-Mantzel-Haenszel test, stratified by the randomization stratification factors. A one-sided significance level of 0.05 will be used. Patients without successful baseline minimal residual disease (MRD) testing will not be evaluated for MRD response. Proportion patients who remain negative for MRD at 10\^-5 for 12 months will be compared between the elran-RVd lite arm and the dara-RVd lite arm.
Time frame: Day of first negative MRD test to study completion (up to 5 years).
Proportion Patients who Remain Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) at 10^-6 for 12 Months
12-month sustained MRD is defined as two MRD negative results a minimum of 12 months apart (with a window of four weeks). Evaluated at 1 x 10\^-6 using next generation sequencing (NGS) to detect clonal sequences. The proportions will be compared using the Cochran-Mantzel-Haenszel test, stratified by the randomization stratification factors. A one-sided significance level of 0.05 will be used. Patients without successful baseline minimal residual disease (MRD) testing will not be evaluated for MRD response. Proportion patients who remain negative for MRD at 10\^-6 for 12 months will be compared between the elran-RVd lite arm and the dara-RVd lite arm.
Time frame: Day of first negative MRD test to study completion (up to 5 years).
Proportion Patients who test Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) at 10^-6 after 12 Treatment Cycles
Evaluated at 1 x 10\^-6 using next generation sequencing (NGS) to detect clonal sequences. The proportions will be compared using the Cochran-Mantzel-Haenszel test, stratified by the randomization stratification factors. A one-sided significance level of 0.05 will be used. Patients without successful baseline minimal residual disease (MRD) testing will not be evaluated for MRD response. Proportion patients who test negative for MRD at 10\^-6 after 12 treatment cycles will be compared between the elran-RVd lite arm and the dara-RVd lite arm.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days) to Day 28 of Cycle 12.
Depth of Response using Peripheral Blood Mass Spectrometry
For the first 50 patients (including the safety run in patients), peripheral blood will be collected for monoclonal protein measurement by mass spectrometry. Mass spectrometry to measure serum monoclonal protein as a form of peripheral blood minimal residual disease (MRD) determination will be compared to the performance of an established assay for measuring minimal residual disease in the bone marrow using next generation sequencing (NGS) by Clonoseq at 10\^-5 threshold. The study will use spectrometry with a clonotypic-based approach using the M-Insight assay.
Time frame: Day 1 of cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days) to day 28 of cycle 24.
Number of Patients who Experience Adverse Events (AEs)
Assessed using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Assessment for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) using the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria. Attribution of the adverse event (AE) will be determined as definite (clearly related to the study treatment), probably (likely related to the study treatment), possible (may be related to the study treatment), unlikely (doubtfully related to the study treatment), or unrelated (clearly not related to the study treatment). A "serious" adverse event is a regulatory definition and is based on subject or event outcome or action criteria usually associated with events that post a threat to a subject's life or functioning.
Time frame: Day 1 of cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days) to day 28 of the patient's last treatment cycle (up to 48 cycles).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.