The present study will investigate whether the combined use of lung and brain ultrasonography is useful in selecting the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute brain injury, aiming at an individualized, brain-protective ventilation strategy.
The present study aims to evaluate whether the combined use of lung ultrasonography and brain ultrasonography can assist in determining the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute brain injury (ABI). In patients with concomitant respiratory and neurological injury, selecting an appropriate PEEP level is particularly challenging, as strategies that improve lung aeration may simultaneously increase intracranial pressure or compromise cerebral hemodynamics. Lung ultrasound will be used to assess aeration patterns and guide lung recruitment through the Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS), while transcranial Doppler ultrasonography will be used to evaluate cerebral blood flow and intracranial pressure surrogates, such as the pulsatility index. By integrating both assessments, the study seeks to identify a PEEP level that optimizes pulmonary function while minimizing adverse effects on cerebral physiology. The overarching goal is to develop an individualized, brain-protective ventilation strategy for patients with ARDS and ABI.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
The intervention includes a stepwise increase in PEEP level from 5 to 8, 12 and 16 centimeter of water (cmH2O). After each PEEP level change, lung ultrasound and transcranial doppler will be performed, and the values of intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain oxygen partial pressure (PO2), as well as the mechanical ventilation parameters, will be recorded. Arterial blood gases will be taken 20 minutes later.
George Papanikolaou General Hospital
Thessaloniki, Greece
RECRUITINGDifference in PEEP Levels Between Optimal PEEP (LUS-Guided) and Safe PEEP (TCD and Respiratory Mechanics-Guided)
Optimal PEEP is determined using the Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS; aeration score 0-36), while Safe PEEP is determined based on Transcranial Doppler (TCD) measurements (Pulsatility Index, mean flow velocity) and respiratory mechanics parameters (driving pressure, plateau pressure, compliance). The outcome represents the difference between Optimal PEEP and Safe PEEP expressed in cmH₂O. Unit of Measure: cmH₂O
Time frame: From the start of the intervention until completion of the PEEP titration procedure, within approximately 120 minutes from intervention initiation.
Correlation Between PEEP Difference and Clinical Outcomes
Correlation between the difference in PEEP levels (cmH₂O) and the following clinical outcomes: duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, and ICU/hospital mortality. Unit of Measure: PEEP difference: cmH₂O, Duration of mechanical ventilation: days, ICU length of stay: days, ICU mortality: %, Hospital mortality: %
Time frame: From the intervention until ICU discharge and hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.