Basal cutaneous cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer. Early-stage disease is managed with surgery or radiation that cure more than 95% of patients. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice and by far the most convenient and effective means of achieving cure of any invasive BCC, Surgery is rarely contra-indicated even in old, debilitated patients, but in locally advanced tumors surgery has the potential of having functional and cosmetic consequences, due to a big tumor size or difficult locations and it is not uncommon tumors that are borderline for the indication of curative surgery. Patients with high-risk disease who have large primary lesions are usually not amenable to a definitive cure with local intervention and may experience significant morbidity, disfigurement, or functional deficits. In some patients, the tumors recur and progress locally being radiotherapy and Hedgehog inhibition therapy available options. Recently, cemiplimab was the first immunotherapy approved by the FDA and EMEA for locally advanced BCC after Hedgehog pathway inhibition The imiquimod (1-(2-methylpropyl)-1-H-imidazole \[4,5-c\] quinolone-amine) is a synthetic compound capable of activating the cells of the immune system, helping to control viruses, tumors, and intracellular parasites The combination of imiquimod plus anti PD-1 antibody could be synergistic. The main hypoteis is that combining cemiplimab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1, and local treatment with the Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) agonist imiquimod may increase immune response against tumor and result in an increase in the rate of definitive cure y in patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) who have a high risk of recurrence after surgery alone or a high risk of morbidity, disfigurement, or functional deficits: to increase the rate of definitive cure. The CEMIQUID study main aims to evaluate: 1. The safety and toxicity of the combination of intravenous cemiplimab plus topical imiquimod (plus fractional laser therapy) as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with high risk and potentially resectable BCC. 2. The antitumoral activity in terms of 3-years rate of relapse-free survival (RFS) according to RECIST 1.1 of intravenous cemiplimab as single therapy or in combination with topical imiquimod plus fractional laser therapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with high risk and potentially resectable BCC. Patients with high risk, potentially resectable basal cell carcinoma (BCC), enrolled in the Phase Ib part of the study will receive treatment with intravenous (iv) cemiplimab plus topical imiquimod plus fractional laser therapy as neoadjuvant treatment. Patients enrolled in the Phase II part will be randomized to receive neoadjuvant cemiplimab as a single agent or the Phase Ib combination with imiquimod and fractional laser therapy
1. RATIONALE Combining cemiplimab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1, and local treatment with the Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) agonist imiquimod may increase immune response against tumor and result in an increase in the rate of definitive cure y in patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) who have a high risk of recurrence after surgery alone or a high risk of morbidity, disfigurement, or functional deficits: to increase the rate of definitive cure. 2. OBJECTIVE Combining cemiplimab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1, and local treatment with the Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) agonist imiquimod may increase immune response against tumor and result in an increase in the rate of definitive cure y in patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) who have a high risk of recurrence after surgery alone or a high risk of morbidity, disfigurement, or functional deficits: to increase the rate of definitive cure. Primary objective: * The primary objective for the Phase Ib part of the trial is to evaluate the safety and toxicity of the combination of intravenous cemiplimab plus topical imiquimod (plus fractional laser therapy) as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with high risk and potentially resectable BCC. * The primary objective for the Phase II of the trial it to evaluate the antitumoral activity in terms of 3-years rate of relapse-free survival (RFS) according to RECIST 1.1 of intravenous cemiplimab as single therapy or in combination with topical imiquimod (plus fractional laser therapy) as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with high risk and potentially resectable BCC. Secondary objectives: * To evaluate pathological complete response rate (pCR) according to Immune-Related Pathologic Response Criteria' (irPRC) criteria. * To evaluate the activity in terms of response rate (RECIST 1.1), duration of response, clinical benefit, RFS/PFS and OS. * To evaluate the rate of resectability (downstaging) of BCC after 4 cycles of treatment. * To evaluate safety of the intended treatment regimen based on the frequency and severity of adverse events and Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) assessed by NCI CTCAE v5.0. * Translational research 3. PRIMARY TRIAL ENDPOINTS * Phase Ib: incidence of adverse events (AE) and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) assessed by NCI CTCAE v5.0 * Phase II: RFS rate at 3 years, defined as the proportion of patients free of locoregional progression or recurrence, distant metastasis (RECIST v 1.1). 4. SECONDARY TRIAL ENDPOINTS * Pathologic complete response (pCR) * Objective response rate (ORR) * Clinical benefit rate (CBR) * Duration of clinical benefit (DBC) * Relapse-free survival (RFS) * Overall survival (OS) * Adverse events (AE) and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) * Molecular alterations in biological samples 5. TRIAL DESIGN CEMIQUID is a multi-center, open-label, phase Ib/II, two-cohort study. The study is divided into two phases: Phase Ib: 6 patients will be included and the main objective will be to evaluate the safety and toxicity of the combination of intravenous cemiplimab plus topical imiquimod (plus fractional laser therapy) as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with high risk and potentially resectable BCC. Phase II: If the treatment is deemed feasible on Phase Ib, 12 additional patients will be included to evaluate the antitumoral activity. On treatment clinic visits will occur every 3 weeks ±3 days. Computed tomography (CT), digital photography and lymph node ultrasonography (if applicable) will be used at baseline, prior to the third dose of neoadjuvant cemiplimab and prior to surgery to assess tumor response. Long term follow up of tumor evolution after surgical intervention will adhere to local standard clinical practice. The trial includes the assessment of safety (AEs, comorbidities) throughout the study period at every visit, and an exploratory study to evaluate the prognostic value and correlation between clinical features or molecular alterations. 6. TRIAL POPULATION Patients with high risk, potentially resectable basal cell carcinoma (BCC). High risk is defined as any of the following: 1. at least 1 large lesion still resectable, but with increased risk for cosmetic disfigurement or functional defects by assessment of the enrolling physician. 2. Having basosquamous, infiltrative, sclerosing/morpheaform, micronodular, and BCC with carcinosarcomatous differentiation features. 3. Patients with large (≥ 3 cm in diameter in areas of intermedium risk of recurrence such as forehead, cheek, chin, neck, scalp or ≥ 5 cm for lesions in trunk/extremities) recurrent BCC. 4. Multicentric tumors that would require a cosmetic disfigurement or functional defects. 7. STUDY TREATMENT All patients enrolled in the Phase Ib part of the study will receive treatment with intravenous (iv) cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks plus topical imiquimod 5% cream self-applied once daily 5 days per week, and ablative fractional CO2 laser 10.600nm (±10nm) at 1- or 3-week intervals, for a total of 4 neoadjuvant cycles (12 weeks). The study treatment may be discontinued prematurely in case of unacceptable toxic effects, or disease progression. Patients enrolled in the Phase II part will be randomized to receive neoadjuvant cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks as a single agent or the Phase Ib combination with imiquimod and CO2 laser. 8. ETHICAL CONSIDERATION Cemiplimab is approved and might be considered the standard of care for patients with metastatic or locally advanced BCC who are not candidates for curative surgery. Imiquimod is a topical standard treatment for patients with BCC. Patients with high risk BCC require surgeries that may involve comorbidities or disfigurement. Combining both treatments may have a synergistic activity and induce tumor size reduction easing its resection. The neoadjuvant timings proposed will not substantially delay the surgical intervention. The use of 4 doses of cemiplimab in the neoadjuvant setting has been previously tested in 79 patients with CSCC and resulted in a feasible and safe therapy. The study is designed as Ib because doses recommended for cemiplimab and imiquimod are well justified by previous experience in clinical trials and use under marketed conditions. Given the different mechanisms of action and the type of administration, it is not expected to have overlapping toxicities that may require dose modifications of the initial recommended doses. Therefore, dose escalation is not required and the trial includes the dosing of one or more cohorts of patients at the recommended dose. The potential risks of cemiplimab and imiquimod are well known based on clinical trials and marketing experience. Most frequent AEs are immune-related and could be properly managed with adequate care. The protocol already includes safety measures to minimize the risks. Therefore, the potential benefits of cemiplimab and imiquimod as combined neoadjuvant treatmnt in patients with BCC outweigh the risks. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964 updated to its latest version Helsinki, Finland, October 2024. With the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) standards issued by the Working Party on Medicinal Product Efficacy of the European Economic Community (1990) (CPMP / ICH / 135/95).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
18
cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks for a total of 4 neoadjuvant cycles (12 weeks).
Topical imiquimod 5% cream self-applied once daily 5 days per week (plus low-intensity laser therapy at 1- or 3-week interval),
Hospital Universitario Dexeus - Grupo Quirónsalud. Carrer de Sabino Arana, 19 Ed, Distrito de Les Corts
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital Clínic de Barcelona. Carrer de Villarroel, 170, L'Eixample
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital Ramón y Cajal. M-607, Km. 9, 100, Fuencarral-El Pardo,
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital Miguel Servet de Zaragoza. P.º de Isabel la Católica, 1-3
Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
RECRUITINGIncidence adverse events (AE) and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) assessed by NCI CTCAE v5.0
The incidence of DLTs evaluated in Phase Ib: considered as the rate of patients who experience adverse events (AE) and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) assessed by NCI CTCAE v5.0 which may be considered DLTs.
Time frame: During DLT evaluation period, the first 3 weeks of treatment for each patient
Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) rate at 3 years.
Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) rate at 3 years evaluated in Phase II study. 3-years RFS rate is defined as the percentage of patients free of locoregional progression or recurrence or new basocellular tumors, distant metastasis (RECIST v 1.1) or death due to any cause after 3 years from the date of study treatment. Patients not presenting any of the previous events will be censored at the date of last assessment. RFS will be summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method and displayed graphically where appropriate. The Cox proportional hazards model will be fitted to compute the hazard ratios on potential stratified groups if applicable. RFS will be calculated as median / mean (95% CI) for each cohort and RFS rate for different timepoints as applicable.The primary endpoint will be assessed locally and centrally. Central assessment will be prioritized for the primary endpoint.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, at 3 years from the start of treatment
Pathological response assessment
Considered the proportion of patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) per Immune-Related Pathologic Response Criteria' (irPRC) criteria: considered as the rate of patients who achieve a pCR. The pCR rate will be estimated by binomial proportion, dividing the number of patients with pCR by the number of patients assessed. The primary analysis will be performed in the per protocol population to avoid missed patients who are not evaluable due to lost to follow up or other reasons. The corresponding exact 2-sided 95% CIs will be provided in global and by cohort..
Time frame: Throughout the study period, at at 3 years from the start of treatment]
Objective response rate (ORR)
Objective response rate (ORR) be considered as the percentage/proportion of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their overall best response throughout the study period. The ORR will be estimated by binomial proportion, dividing the number of patients with objective response (CR or PR). The corresponding exact 2-sided 95% CIs will be provided by cohort. Changes in tumor size from baseline will be calculated and displayed graphically, where appropriate.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, at 3 years from the start of treatment
Clinical benefit rate (CBR)
Percentage/proportion of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), according to ORR definition for the trial, or maintained stable disease (SD) as their overall best response until surgery. The CBR will be estimated by binomial proportion, dividing the number of patients with objective response (CR, PR, or SD until surgery). The corresponding exact 2-sided 95% CIs will be provided by cohort. Changes in tumor size from baseline will be calculated and displayed graphically, where appropriate
Time frame: Throughout the study period, at at 3 years from the start of treatment
Duration of clinical benefit (DBC)
Defined as the time from first dose of treatment until relapse / progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, in patients who had a best overall response of CR, PR, or SD until surgery. Those patients without relapse /progression or death event will be censored on the date of their last tumor assessment. DCR will be summarized by cohort using Kaplan-Meier method and displayed graphically, where appropriate. The mean, median DCR and 95% CIs will be provided.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, at at 3 years from the start of treatment
Rate of resectability, and downstaging:
defined as the percentage of patients who are eligible to surgical intervention after 4 cycles of neoadjuvant study treatment according to investigator criteria and achieve a complete resection (R0). Downstaging, defined as the percentage of patients that have a significant tumor decrease which would require a less complex surgical procedure and therefore less extensive functional and aesthetic consequences. The level of surgical complexity should be reduced to at least 1 lower level (for example, from a stage A surgical procedure to a stage B surgical procedure
Time frame: Throughout the study period, at 6 months from the start of treatment
Overall survival (OS)
Defined as the time from the date of study treatment initiation to the date of death for any cause. The follow-up of subjects still alive will be censored at the date of last visit/contact. OS will be summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method and displayed graphically where appropriate. CIs for the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles or specific time points considered adequate by the time of the analysis will be reported. The Cox proportional hazards model will be fitted to compute the hazard ratios on potential stratified groups if applicable. OS will be calculated as median / mean (95% CI) for each cohort and OS rate for different timepoints as applicable.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, at 3 years from the start of treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.