Candidates for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) frequently experience declines in strength, physical function, and quality of life before the procedure. Many also present fatigue, limitations in daily activities, and an increased risk of complications during and after hospitalization. Optimizing physical condition before transplantation may improve post-procedure recovery. This study will evaluate whether a prehabilitation program improves physical function, frailty, and quality of life in adults preparing for HSCT. The intervention consists of supervised exercise, education, and activities designed to enhance endurance and functional capacity. Although prehabilitation has shown benefits in other oncologic populations, it has been minimally studied in HSCT candidates, and no structured programs have been evaluated in Chile. A total of 68 adults will be randomly assigned to a prehabilitation group or a usual-care control group. The prehabilitation group will receive a personalized program including aerobic and resistance exercise, stretching, balance training, respiratory exercises, and education on healthy behaviors, delivered through a hybrid model of in-person and remote sessions. Occupational therapy will also be provided to support functional and cognitive abilities. The control group will continue with standard medical care. Baseline and post-intervention assessments will include measures of strength, frailty, fatigue, balance, cognitive function, daily activities, and quality of life. Post-transplant outcomes such as hospital length of stay, complications, and readmissions within three months will also be recorded. Feasibility, adherence, satisfaction, and adverse events will be evaluated. Findings from this trial may inform the development of structured prehabilitation programs for HSCT candidates and support the implementation of evidence-based supportive care strategies in hematologic oncology.
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a complex treatment widely used for hematologic malignancies. Although it offers curative potential, many patients experience significant declines in physical functioning, increased frailty, fatigue, and reduced quality of life before and after transplantation. Lower functional reserve prior to HSCT has been associated with greater treatment-related complications, longer hospital stays, and slower recovery. Despite growing evidence supporting exercise-based interventions in cancer care, prehabilitation has been minimally studied in HSCT candidates, and no structured prehabilitation program has been tested in Chile. This randomized clinical trial investigates whether a multimodal prehabilitation program delivered before HSCT can improve frailty, functional capacity, quality of life, and early post-transplant outcomes. The intervention combines supervised aerobic and resistance exercise, balance and flexibility training, respiratory exercises, education on healthy behaviors, and a structured home-based component. A hybrid delivery model (in-person and remote sessions) allows tailoring to individual needs and supports continuity of care. Occupational therapy sessions complement the program by addressing cognitive and functional abilities relevant to daily activities. A total of 68 adults preparing for HSCT will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the prehabilitation group or a usual-care control group. The study uses concealed allocation and blinded outcome assessment. Feasibility-including adherence, acceptability, and reported adverse events-will also be evaluated to determine whether the program can be safely and efficiently implemented in a real-world transplant setting. The results of this trial will provide new evidence on whether prehabilitation can strengthen physical resilience before HSCT, reduce early post-transplant complications, and support better recovery. Findings may guide the development of standardized prehabilitation programs for patients undergoing HSCT and inform national recommendations for supportive care in hematologic oncology.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
68
In-Person Sessions: Supervised by a cancer-specialized physiotherapist. Includes: * Aerobic exercise: 20-25 min. at moderate intensity (BORG 4-6 or 60-80% HRmax). * Resistance training: 20-25 min. at 10-12 RM, using dumbbells or resistance bands. * Flexibility or balance training: 5 minutes. * Warm-up and cool-down: 5 minutes each. Sessions last 1-1.5 hours, 2-3 times/week, 15-18 sessions Education on healthy habits, smoking and alcohol cessation, sleep hygiene, and physical activity. Daily home-exercise logs and telephone supervision will support adherence. Remote Sessions: (Video call/Zoom, 45-60 min): Mixed exercises, breathing techniques, and incentive spirometry. Occupational Therapy Intervention * cognitive training (memory, attention, executive function), * upper limb functional training (fine/gross motor skills, bilateral coordination, prehension) * ADL/IADL training * energy-conservation techniques and joint-protection strategies. 6-8 sessions, 30-45 min.
Hospital del Salvador
Santiago, Providencia, Chile
Hospital del Salvador
Santiago, Providencia, Chile
Functional Capacity
In the 1-minute Sit-to-Stand Test (1-min STST), participants perform repeated sit-to-stand movements for 60 seconds. The number of repetitions completed will be record. Higher scores indicate better functional capacity. The test is validated as a measure of submaximal functional endurance.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (4-6 weeks)
Frailty
Frailty will be assessed using the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index Frailty Scale (HCT Frailty Scale). The scale includes 8 items: Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Self-Rated Health Question, Falls history, Handgrip strength, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), serum albumin levels, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Each item is scored as normal or abnormal, yielding a total score from 0 to 10.5, with higher scores indicating greater frailty. Participants will be classified as fit, pre-frail, or frail.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (approximately 4-6 weeks).
Lower Limb Strength
In the 30-second Sit-to-Stand Test (30s STST), participants are instructed to stand up and sit down from a standard chair as many times as possible within 30 seconds. The total number of completed repetitions is recorded, with higher numbers indicating better lower-limb strength. The test has demonstrated good reliability in cancer and older adult populations.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (4-6 weeks)
Handgrip Strength
Handgrip strength will be assessed with the Jamar® hydraulic hand dynamometer following the American Society of Hand Therapists standardized protocol. The maximum isometric grip force (in kilograms) will be recorded. Reduced grip strength is associated with frailty and poor outcomes in cancer populations.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (4-6 weeks)
Fatigue
Fatigue will be assessed using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), a validated 9-item questionnaire evaluating fatigue severity and functional interference on a 0-10 numeric scale. The instrument provides a global fatigue score, categorized as: 0 (no fatigue), 1-3 (mild), 4-6 (moderate), and 7-10 (severe). Higher scores indicate greater fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (4-6 weeks)
Dynamic Balance and Fall Risk
Dynamic balance and fall risk will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). Participants stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return, and sit down. The time (in seconds) to complete the task is recorded. Faster times indicate better mobility and lower fall risk. A time ≤10 seconds is considered normal functional mobility.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (4-6 weeks)
Subjective physical activity level
Physical activity levels will be assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF). The instrument records walking, moderate-intensity, and vigorous-intensity activities performed during the previous 7 days. Data are converted into metabolic equivalent minutes per week (MET-min/week). Higher scores represent higher physical activity levels.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (4-6 weeks)
Objective Physical Activity
It will be measured using an ActivPAL™ accelerometer, recording steps, cadence, posture, transitions, moderate-intensity activity, and sedentary behavior over 10 days.
Time frame: 7-day monitoring at baseline and 7-day monitoring post-intervention
Post-Transplant Outcomes
It includes: * Hospital length of stay: days from stem cell infusion to discharge. * Post-transplant complications (within 3 months). * Hospital readmission: number and duration of readmissions within 3 months.
Time frame: During index hospitalization for HSCT
Cognitive Function
Cognitive function will be evaluated using the Mini-Mental Abbreviated Test validated for Chile. The instrument assesses orientation, memory, attention, calculation, and language, with a maximum score of 35. Scores ≥30 indicate normal cognition; lower scores reflect mild to severe cognitive impairment.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (4-6 weeks)
Functioning and Disability
Disability will be assessed using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), a validated 36-item instrument aligned with the ICF domains. It evaluates cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation. Scores are standardized on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (4-6 weeks)
Quality of Life measured by the FACT-BMT
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The questionnaire includes Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, Functional Well-Being, and Bone Marrow Transplant-Specific Concerns. Total scores range from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (4-6 weeks)
Feasibility: adherence, satisfaction, and adverse events
Feasibility will be assessed through: (1) adherence (percentage of prescribed sessions completed), (2) user satisfaction measured via a 9-item Likert-scale questionnaire, and (3) number and severity of adverse events reported during the intervention period.
Time frame: Throughout the intervention period (4-6 weeks)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.