The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate how manual dominance influences the effectiveness of bilateral robotic treatment in right-handed patients with chronic stroke. Researchers will compare the outcome of a bilateral robotic treatment for the upper limbs in left vs right hemisphere lesions following stroke. Participants will: * perform a bilateral robotic treatment for the upper limb (15 sessions in three weeks) followed by 20-minutes standard manual rehabilitative sessions * be evaluated before and after treatment with clinical scales, resting- state EEG and kinematic measurements
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
60
Patients will perform a specific sequence of exercises with the exoskeleton for the upper limbs ALEx-RS, including passive and active-assisted movements, unilateral and bilateral reaching tasks with visual feedback, and symmetric and asymmetric bimanual coordination tasks.
After the robotic treatment, patients will undergo 20 minutes of conventional treatment consisting of passive and active-assisted mobilization with the help of a physiotherapist.
Changes in the Fugl-Meyer for the upper limb functional scale (UEFM)
The scale ranges from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better performance
Time frame: From the pre-training evaluation (T0) to the follow up (T2), about 11 weeks after T0
Changes in the Bimanual Activity Test scale (BAT)
The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance
Time frame: From the pre-training evaluation (T0) to the follow up (T2), about 11 weeks after T0
Changes in the modified Ashworth scale (MAS)
The scale ranges from 0 to 6, with lower scores indicating better performance
Time frame: From the pre-training evaluation (T0) to the follow up (T2), about 11 weeks after T0
Changes in the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance
Time frame: From the pre-training evaluation (T0) to the follow up (T2), about 11 weeks after T0
Changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher pain
Time frame: From the pre-training evaluation (T0) to the follow up (T2), about 11 weeks after T0
Changes in the Quick Dash scale
The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher level of disability
Time frame: From the pre-training evaluation (T0) to the follow up (T2), about 11 weeks after T0
Changes in weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI) cortico-cortical brain connectivity (EEG)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The investigators will be measuring variations in the weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI)
Time frame: From the pre-training evaluation (T0) to the follow up (T2), about 11 weeks after T0
Changes in weighted Symbolic Mutual Information (wSMI) cortico-cortical brain connectivity (EEG)
The investigators will be measuring variations in the weighted Symbolic Mutual Information (wSMI)
Time frame: From the pre-training evaluation (T0) to the follow up (T2), about 11 weeks after T0
Changes in muscular synergies (EMG)
The investigators wil be measuring changes in muscle synergy patterns using the non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) algorithm
Time frame: From the pre-training evaluation (T0) to the follow up (T2), about 11 weeks after T0
Changes in kinematic movement smoothness (SPARC)
The investigators will measure changes in movement smoothness using the SPARC parameter
Time frame: From the pre-training evaluation (T0) to the follow up (T2), about 11 weeks after T0