A prospective, single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled study to evaluate the clinical value of transparent cap-assisted second examination of the sigmoid colon for improving colorectal adenoma detection rates
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. In recent years, with the increasing Westernization of diet and lifestyle, the incidence and prevalence of CRC in China have risen rapidly, making CRC one of the most common gastrointestinal malignancies in the country. Its incidence and mortality now rank second and fifth, respectively, among all cancers. The disease burden of CRC in China has become substantial, and reducing its incidence and mortality is an urgent public health priority. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for CRC screening, and timely endoscopic management of precancerous lesions plays a critical role in reducing both CRC incidence and mortality. Interval CRC refers to cancers diagnosed before the next recommended examination after a negative screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an independent predictor of interval CRC risk; long-term follow-up data suggest that every 1% increase in ADR corresponds to a 5% reduction in the risk of interval CRC and a 3% reduction in mortality. However, emerging evidence indicates that interval CRC can still occur even among endoscopists with high ADRs, suggesting that some precancerous lesions may still be missed. The main contributors to missed colorectal adenomas include: (1) operator-related factors such as fatigue, reduced attention, or limited lesion recognition; (2) image-related factors such as low-resolution visualization; and (3) inadequate mucosal exposure due to residual folds. In recent years, several studies have explored the use of "repeat intubation" to reduce missed adenomas. Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews have shown that a second examination can increase ADR, but most studies have focused on the right colon and often relied on chromoendoscopy or other image-enhancement modalities to improve lesion visibility. Evidence regarding second intubation specifically for the sigmoid colon remains limited, and even fewer studies have evaluated interventions based on transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy. Given that the sigmoid colon is a common site for missed polyps and adenomas, optimizing visualization in this segment may have a significant impact on overall ADR and CRC prevention. In summary, there is still a lack of clinical evidence on whether transparent cap-assisted second intubation of the sigmoid colon can improve colorectal adenoma detection. A randomized controlled trial in the Chinese population is therefore needed to clarify its clinical value, with the potential to increase lesion detection and improve the overall quality of colonoscopy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
614
standard second examination of the sigmoid colon
transparent cap-assisted second examination of the sigmoid colon
Huadong hospital, Fudan university
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Adenoma detection rate in the rectum and sigmoid colon
Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure
Increased adenoma detection rate in the rectum and sigmoid colon achieved by second examination
Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure
Adenoma miss rate in the rectum and sigmoid colon
Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure
Per-colonoscopy adenoma miss rate in the rectum and sigmoid colon
Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure
Sessile serrated lesion detection rate in rectum and sigmoid colon
Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure
Advanced adenoma detection rate in rectum and sigmoid colon
Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure
Polyp detection rate in rectum and sigmoid colon
Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure
Sessile serrated lesion detection rate
Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure
Advanced adenoma detection rate
Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure
Polyp detection rate
Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure
Perforation rate
Time frame: immediately after the procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Clinically Significant Immediate Post-polypectomy Bleeding(CSIPB)rate
CSIPB was defined as any bleeding not responding to water jet irrigation or STSC and therefore requiring either coagu lation forceps or mechanical clips to achieve hemostasis
Time frame: immediately after the procedure
Clinically Significant Delayed Post-polypectomy Bleeding(CSDPB)rate
CSPEB was defined as any bleeding after completion of the procedure requiring emergency room presentation, hospital isation or re-intervention (endoscopy, angiography, surgery).
Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure