The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Injectrode Tibial Nerve Stimulation for bladder function in people with spinal cord injury.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
21
The stimulation current will be gradually increased until bilateral toe flexion is achieved, then reduced to just below the motor contraction threshold. A 20 Hz frequency and 200 µs pulse width will be applied continuously for 30 minutes, five times a week.
The sham devices are designed to mimic active stimulation by initially delivering electrical current sufficient to evoke toe flexion. However, once the current is reduced to the sensory stimulation threshold, the device automatically ramps down to 0mA while maintaining the appearance of normal functioning on the display screen.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
RECRUITINGSafety as assessed by the number of device-related adverse events
Adverse events include lead migration and fracture, hematoma, wound infection, delayed healing, nerve injury, and autonomic dysreflexia occurrence during the procedure.
Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks
Accuracy as assessed by the percentage of sessions where toe flexion was achieved as recorded in subject logs.
Time frame: From baseline to week 8
Reliability as assessed by the average minimum current (mA) required to elicit toe flexion when testing for accuracy
Time frame: From baseline to week 8
Feasibility of Injectrode procedure as assessed by surveys
Feasibility to check if reproducible training pathway can enable non-interventional physicians to competently perform Injectrode implantation and removal
Time frame: Week 8
Physician acceptability of Injectrode device as assessed by a survey
The acceptability survey ranges from 0 - 32, with a higher score indicating greater acceptability of the Injectrode device.
Time frame: Week 8
Participant acceptability of Injectrode device as assessed by a survey
The acceptability survey ranges from 0 - 25, with a higher score indicating greater acceptability of the Injectrode device.
Time frame: Week 8
Feasibility and acceptability of the Injectrode treatment as assessed by a qualitative interview
A semi-structured interview will be conducted with participants and providers to explore their perceptions of the Injectrode treatment. Responses will be summarized using qualitative coding and descriptive statistics of themes.
Time frame: Week 8
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Number of participants for whom bladder medication dosage reduced
Time frame: from baseline to 8 weeks
Change in magnitude of dosage of medication
Time frame: from baseline to 8 weeks
Change in bladder function during urodynamics as assessed by the maximum detrusor pressure (Max Pdet) in cmH20.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in Bladder function as assessed by the presence or absence of detrusor overactivity (DO) during urodynamics.
Time frame: baseline, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in bladder capacity (maximum volume in mL) during urodynamics before voiding or discomfort.
Time frame: baseline, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in the presence or absence of leaks during urodynamics.
Time frame: baseline, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in bladder sensation during urodynamics as defined by the infused volume (mL) at time of reported first sensation of filling.
Time frame: baseline, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in bladder sensation during urodynamics as defined by infused volume (mL) at time of reported urgency/ desire to void.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in bladder sensation during urodynamics as defined by the infused volume (mL) at the time of reported discomfort.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in detrusor compliance during urodynamics as reported by the change in bladder volume divided by the change in bladder pressure.
Time frame: baseline, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in the number of incontinence episodes as self-reported in the bladder diary.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in the frequency of catheterization as self-reported in the bladder diary.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8
Change in the volume of catheterization as self-reported in the bladder diary.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8