Will Calcium-Enriched Mixture (CEM) cement pulpotomy have less postoperative pain and more clinical and radiographic success compared to Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform (Metapex) pulpectomy when managing second primary molars with irreversible pulpitis?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
50
pulpotomy procedure using (CEM) Cement as pulp dressing material
pulpectomy procdure performed using Metapex paste as root canal filling material
Postoperative Pain Intensity
Pain intensity will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of faces, rated from 0 (no pain) to 5 (severe pain). Assessment will be performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment. Clinical success will be considered when the patient reports no pain (score = 0).
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment
Evaluation of Clinical Success
Clinical success will be evaluated by the absence of pain, swelling, tenderness to percussion, sinus, fistula, and pathological mobility. Clinical assessment will be performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment
Evaluation of Radiographic Success
Radiographic success will be defined as the absence of widening of the periodontal ligament space, internal/external root resorption, or radiolucency in the furcation or periapical area. Radiographic failure will be recorded if any of these findings are observed.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months post-treatment
Alaa Hassab Elrasoul Abdelmajed, Master degree
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.