IABP for MI-VSD Patients in SCAI SHOCK Stage B

Overview

Ventricular septal defect (MI-VSD) is a serious mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction, with an extremely high mortality. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is still the most easily available mechanical assistive device for clinical management, and it has become a bridge to surgical repair. IABP-SHOCK II trial is currently the largest randomized controlled trial (RCT) related to the use of IABP among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), the trial found that IABP had a negative impact on 30-day, 1-year, and 6-year all-cause mortality. However, the trial included patients with typical cardiogenic shock (shock stages C-E, SCAI definition criteria), most of whom had severely inadequate microcirculatory perfusion, limiting the effectiveness of IABP treatment. There is still no clinical study on the usage of IABP in MI-VSD patients with early-stage CS. The main objective of this study is to assess the correlation between the utilization of IABP and 30-day mortality rates among MI-VSD patients with early-stage CS. The investigators will also follow up on the long-term prognosis of these patients. The investigators will enroll multicenter patients with MI-VSD who are at the onset of cardiogenic shock (SCAI SHOCK stage B) to explore the impact of IABP support on the prognosis of these patients. This prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group controlled study will involve 100 participants who are diagnosed with MI-VSD complicated by SCAI SHOCK stage B in about 5 centers. After reviewing the inclusion criteria, participants will be randomized to two groups (Early-CS-IABP group and Control group) in a ratio of 1:1. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality within 30 days after MI-VSD. The investigators will also observe 6-month and 1-year all-cause mortality after MI-VSD. The investigators speculated that IABP could significantly improve the clinical outcomes of patients with MI-VSD if it could be used in the early stage of cardiogenic shock.

1. Background Ventricular septal rupture (MI-VSD) is a severe mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction with an extremely high mortality rate. Previous studies have shown that MI-VSD occurs in 1% to 3% of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS), the incidence of MI-VSD increases to 3.9% . The early and long-term prognosis for MI-VSD remains poor. A study found that the 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality rates for patients with MI-VSD were 62%, 72%, and 95%, respectively, with the 30-day mortality rate for patients treated medically being 100%. Traditional shock stage criteria cannot accurately identify the pre-shock stage, thus failing to implement timely intervention measures to prevent hemodynamic deterioration. In 2022, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) proposed a shock stage classification system that divides shock into stage A to E, defined as at risk, beginning, classic, deteriorating, and extremis, providing a risk stratification for mortality in CS patients. According to this staging system, patients begin to exhibit significant hemodynamic disturbances and inadequate microcirculatory perfusion at SCAI SHOCK stage C, which is the typical cardiogenic shock stage. IABP-SHOCK II trial is currently the largest randomized controlled trial (RCT) related to the use of IABP among patients with AMICS. The trial found that IABP had a negative impact on all-cause mortality within 30 days, 1 year, and 6 years for AMICS patients. Therefore, the 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guidelines for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) recommend against routine use of IABP as a standard supportive therapy in patients with AMICS. However, the trial included patients with typical cardiogenic shock (SCAI SHOCK stages C-E), most of whom had severely inadequate microcirculatory perfusion, limiting the effectiveness of IABP treatment. Patients with MI-VSD experienced rapid hemodynamic changes, and untreated ventricular septal perforation areas might further expand. Despite the current guideline downgrading the recommendation for routine use of IABP in patients with AMICS, it remains the most prevalent method utilized in clinical practice. According to the investigators' retrospective study based on MI-VSD patients who were admitted to Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from 2013 to 2024, the use of IABP could remarkably reduce the 30-day mortality and improve long-term prognosis in patients with early-stage cardiogenic shock (SCAI SHOCK stages A/B) at baseline, but did not improve outcomes in those with typical cardiogenic shock (SCAI SHOCK stages C-E). Significant differences between clinical practice and guidelines suggest that a specific population of MI-VSD patients may respond well to IABP support. This study aims to enroll multicenter patients with MI-VSD who are at the onset of cardiogenic shock (SCAI SHOCK stage B) to explore the impact of IABP support on the prognosis of these patients. This study include patients in shock stage B because they are at the beginning of AMICS and also a critical period for treatment. 2. Speculated conclusion The investigators speculated that IABP could significantly improve the clinical outcomes of patients with MI-VSD if it could be used in the early stage of cardiogenic shock. 3. Study Design 3.1 Design Prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group controlled trial 3.2 Study Participant Grouping The grouping will be conducted using a central randomized complete random design. After reviewing the inclusion criteria, participants will be randomized to two groups in a ratio of 1:1. (1) Early-CS-IABP group: Immediate placement (within 8 hours) of an IABP followed by medication upon admission; (2) Control group: Routine medication treatment upon admission. According to the current guidelines, patients will receive IABP insertion to maintain circulation when they progress to SCAI SHOCK stages C-E. For patients with SCAI SHOCK stages C-E who have had IABP inserted, crossover to the early IABP group is not allowed, as they do not receive early intervention in stage B 3.3 Sample Size Based on the data from previous studies, assuming a 30-day all-cause mortality rate of 50% in the control group and an Early-CS-IABP group can reduce the mortality rate to 20%, with α=0.05 (two-sided) and β=0.1 (90% power), we calculate that at least 47 patients are needed in each group, totaling 94 patients. Considering 5% possible attrition and data loss, we aim to recruit a total of 100 participants. 3.4 Sample collection Whole blood specimen 10mL 4 Statistical Methods Statistical analysis will be conducted using SPSS and R. The population will be randomly divided into the IABP group and the control group. Baseline data and clinical outcomes of the study population will be compared for differences. Continuous variables will be analyzed for differences using T-tests, ANOVA, and nonparametric tests. Categorical variables will be analyzed using the chi-square test for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves will be used to estimate the 30-day cumulative mortality rates in the IABP group and the control group, and the Log-rank test will be used to compare the differences between the two groups. Subgroup analyses will be conducted to compare the association between early IABP implantation and 30-day all-cause mortality in different subgroups, and to analyze interactions. Secondary endpoints and safety endpoints will be evaluated using Fisher's exact test or the chi-square test for binary endpoint assessment, or the Mann-Whitney U test for quantitative endpoint assessment. The investigators will conduct Cox regression analysis to evaluate the impact of IABP implantation on 6-month and 1-year mortality. A p-value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.