This trial is a proof-of-concept, pilot study, phase I/II clinical trial aimed at generating preliminary data on the combination of golcadomide, poseltinib, and rituximab.
This is a single arm, open-label, phase I/II trial of Poseltinib in combination with golcadomide and rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Considering (1) the combination of BTK inhibitor, lenalidomide, and rituximab has demonstrated efficacy in R/R DLBCL, (2) golcadomide, a CELMoD, exhibits potent immunomodulatory activity compared to IMiDs such as lenalidomide, and (3) poseltinib is a potent, covalent BTK inhibitor with more than twice the selectivity for BTK compared to other BTK inhibitors, we anticipate that this combination will yield promising results in R/R DLBCL.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
Participants will receive 0.4 mg of golcadomide once daily for 14 consecutive days for 18 cycles in 28-day cycles. The first 6 cycles will be administered in combination with rituximab and poseltinib, while the remaining 12 cycles will be conducted with poseltinib alone. During the maintenance period (Cycles 7-18), the first day of study treatment administration with golcadomide is designated as Day 1 of each cycle. Rituximab can be administered with or up to 2 hours after the morning dose of golcadomide in the fed or fasted state. For Cycles 1-6, the first day of study treatment administration with rituximab is designated as Day 1 of each cycle. Rituximab will be administered as an IV infusion at a dose of 375 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycle 1, and Day 1 of Cycles 2-6. Poseltinib is administered orally twice daily, approximately every 12 hour. Part 1 (safety cohort) of the study will be conducted in up to approximately 9 participants to select the optimal RP2D of poseltinib.
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Overall response rate (ORR)
The primary endpoint was the Overall response rate, defined as the proportion of participants who achieved either CMR or PMR according to the Lugano criteria 2014. The primary analysis will be conducted in the efficacy evaluable population. A one-sample exact binomial test (one-sided, α=0.05) will be used to compare the observed ORR against the null hypothesis value of 30%. If the lower bound of the exact one-sided 95% CI for the observed ORR exceeds 30%, the null hypothesis will be rejected, suggesting that the combination therapy demonstrates meaningful efficacy.
Time frame: The evaluation time frame is from baseline up to 18 months.
Progression-free survival (PFS)
PFS is calculated as the time from enrollment to the first documented progression confirmed or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response assessments will be based on the Lugano criteria 2014. PFS analysis will follow the censoring rules based on Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guideline (2018) as the primary analysis method. Specifically, subjects who initiated other anti-lymphoma therapy without documented PD will be censored at last adequate assessment prior to the initiation of other anti-lymphoma therapy. Subjects with two or more consecutive missed assessments prior to documented PD or death will be censored at the last adequate assessment prior to the missing assessment. The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival distribution functions. The median PFS along with the two-sided 95% CI for the median will be estimated.
Time frame: The evaluation time frame extends from baseline to 1 year and 3 year after the last patient in.
Overall survival (OS)
OS is calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Subjects who died will be considered as having OS events on the date of death. All subjects who are lost to follow-up prior to the date of the data cut-off or who withdrew consent from the trial will be censored at the last date known to be alive. Subjects who are still in the study at the date of data cut-off will be censored at the last available date that the subject is known to be alive, or data cut-off date, whichever is earlier. The analysis of OS will be based on all data available. The median OS along with the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the median will be estimated.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: The evaluation time frame extends from baseline to 3 years after the last patient in.
Complete metabolic response (CMR) rate
The CMR rate is the proportion of subjects who achieve CMR according to the Lugano criteria 2014.
Time frame: The evaluation time frame is from baseline up to 18 months.
Duration of response (DOR)
DoR is calculated as the time from first documentation of response (CMR or PMR) to the first documented progression confirmed, start of new anti-lymphoma therapy, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response assessments will be based on the Lugano criteria 2014. The analysis will be conducted in patients who achieved a documented response. The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival distribution functions for each treatment arm. The median DoR along with the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the median will be estimated.
Time frame: The evaluation time frame extends from baseline to 1 year and 3 years after the last patient in.
Recommended poseltinib dose
In Part 1 (safety cohort; dose-finding phase), the recommended poseltinib dose for Part 2 will be determined based on the totality of safety and efficacy data, selecting between 40 mg BID and 60 mg BID.
Time frame: through study part 1 completion, up to 8 weeks.
Safety
Safety data will be summarized for the safety cohort. The baseline value for the safety analysis is defined as the value collected at the time closest to and before the start of study intervention administration. Estimates of safety measures (adverse events) will be summarized with frequency (%).
Time frame: from C1D1 to end of trial, assessed up to 3 years after the last patient in.