The goal of this study is to develop and test an outpatient intervention for preadolescents (ages 7-12) with self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Are the recruitment targets and study design feasible? 2. Is the new intervention feasible, acceptable, and appropriate? 3. Does the new intervention lead to more improvements in SITBs, mental health symptoms, and treatment targets relative to treatment as usual (TAU)? In Phase 1 (pre-implementation, months 1-6), enrolled preadolescent and caregiver dyads will receive TAU. In Phase 2 (post-implementation, months 7-13), enrolled dyads will receive the newly-developed SITB intervention. Participants will be recruited through referrals from the psychiatric emergency department at Children's Hospital Colorado. Participants will: 1. Complete an initial baseline assessment to determine eligibility and assess SITBs, mental health symptoms, executive functioning, and emotion regulation 2. Participate in an intervention lasting 6-12 weeks, including weekly or biweekly sessions 3. Complete additional assessments at post-treatment and 3-month follow-up 4. Participate in an interview sharing their perceptions of the intervention
In Stage 1 of the study (Aim 1), the investigators will iteratively design an intervention for preadolescent SITBs through a step-by-step process using frameworks for systematically developing and adapting interventions (Wingood et al., 2008; Bartholomew et al., 1998). The design process will incorporate user-centered design methods, whereby multisectoral experts and end-users (i.e., therapists and families) will participate in the design process to maximize the intervention's dissemination and implementation potential. In Stage 2 of the study (Aims 2 and 3), the new intervention will be evaluated using a quasi-experimental, pre-post implementation design including 52 preadolescents and caregiver(s), recruited through the CHCO emergency department (ED) at the Anschutz Campus. In Stage 1, the investigators will use mixed methods approaches and user-centered design principles to iteratively develop the preadolescent SITB intervention. Through a needs assessment, the investigators will use an exploratory sequential qualitative--\> quantitative mixed methods design, whereby qualitative interviews with therapists will inform the development of a quantitative survey assessing needs and experiences of therapists treating preadolescents with SITBs. Results from the therapist assessment will be integrated with findings from qualitative interviews with preadolescents and caregiversto further inform initial decisions about core functions and specific components of the intervention. During a pre-testing phase utilizing a concurrent mixed methods approach, therapists and preadolescents/families will participate in think-aloud design sessions to provide quantitative and qualitative feedback about rough intervention prototypes. An initial draft of the intervention will then be produced and reviewed by a group of experts, resulting in a second draft of the intervention and therapist training and consultation procedures. A single-arm, intervention development trial with 6 preadolescents will inform adaptations to the intervention, therapist training, and trial procedures. In Stage 2, the investigators will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the study methods and intervention, implementation, and changes in SITB and mental health outcomes using a quasi-experimental, pre-post implementation design (ADAPT-ITT Step 8, Part 2). The trial will have two phases. In Phase 1 of the trial (pre-implementation, months 1-6), enrolled participants will receive treatment as usual (TAU); in Phase 2 of the trial (post-implementation, months 7-13), enrolled participants will receive the new intervention. All treatment will be delivered at the Crisis Clinic at Children's Hospital Colorado, which provides short-term (i.e., 6-12 session) outpatient crisis intervention to youth referred from the ED. Clinicians (up to N = 16) will be recruited from the Crisis Clinic to participate. During Phase 1, clinicians will provide treatment using their typical clinical practice. Prior to Phase 2, clinicians will receive training in the new intervention and will receive monthly consultation support from the developers throughout the implementation phase. Aim 2 will evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and implementation outcomes for the intervention and study procedures. Aim 3 will be to collect preliminary evidence to explore changes in SITBs, hypothesized target mechanisms of EF and emotion regulation, and mental health symptoms relative to TAU.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
52
Typical interventions Outpatient therapist would provide to a preadolescent with SITBs, based on their clinical judgement
Experimental intervention developed with end-users and experts to target emotion regulation, executive functioning, and other risk factors for SITBs in preadolescents
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Feasibility of recruitment
% recruitment targets met (benchmark = 52 preadolescents enrolled within 13 months)
Time frame: Calculated at enrollment
Suicidal Ideation Intensity
Measured using the Columbia Suicide and Self Injury Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS; Posner et al., 2011), a brief interview that consists of sections that assess: suicidal ideation, ideation intensity, and suicidal behavior. The C-SSRS has strong convergent validity, sensitivity to change, predictive and incremental validity, and good internal consistency.
Time frame: From enrollment to 3-month follow-up at 20 weeks
Feasibility of Retention
% participants completing treatment (benchmark =≥ 80% participants considered treatment completers)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Perceived Appropriateness of Intervention
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM; Weiner et al., 2017) will be completed by preadolescents, caregivers, and therapists. The IAM is a 4-item measure assessing the extent to which stakeholders believe an intervention or to be appropriate. Items are rated from 1 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"), with higher scores indicating greater appropriateness. The appropriateness benchmark for all reporters is set at a mean score of 4 or greater.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Perceived Feasibility of Intervention
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM; Weiner et al., 2017) will be completed by preadolescents, caregivers, and therapists. The FIM is a 4-item measures assessing the extent to which stakeholders believe an intervention to be feasible. Items are rated from 1 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"), with higher scores indicating greater feasibility. The feasibility benchmark for all reporters is set at a mean score of 4 or greater.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Perceived acceptability of intervention
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM; Weiner et al., 2017) will be completed by preadolescents, caregivers, and therapists. The AIM is a 4-item measure assessing the extent to which stakeholders believe an intervention to be acceptable. Items are rated from 1 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"), with higher scores indicating greater acceptability. The acceptability benchmark for all reporters is set at a mean score of 4 or greater.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Treatment Engagement
Number of treatment sessions completed at post-treatment, compared to prescribed or recommended number of sessions
Time frame: From enrollment to post-treatment at 8 weeks
Readmission/Admission Rates
Readmission/admission rates to the psychiatric ED or inpatient psychiatric hospitalization will be evaluated via caregiver report on the Brief form of the Services Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA; Horwitz et al., 2001), which will be supplemented with chart review.
Time frame: From enrollment to 3-month follow-up at 8 weeks
Feasibility of Measurement
% participants at each timepoint completing measures (target = ≥ 80% at each timepoint).
Time frame: From enrollment to follow-up at 20 weeks
Non-Suicidal Self-Injury
Measured using an adapted version of the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI)-Short Form, Thoughts of NSSI and NSSI subscales (Nock et al., 2007), which assesses history and characteristics of NSSI thoughts and behaviors. First instance of engagement in NSSI after beginning treatment will be the outcome of most interest, but other outcomes assessed by the interview (e.g., frequency of NSSI thoughts) may be examined as well if rates of NSSI are very low.
Time frame: From enrollment to 3-month follow-up at 20 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.