The purpose of this research study is to investigate a closed-loop transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) device to evaluate its ability to reduce symptoms of major depressive disorder
This study examines the efficacy of closed-loop transcranial alternating current stimulation (CL-tACS) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in a double-blind, controlled parallel group multi-site clinical trial. 214 participants will be randomized into receiving 5 consecutive days of active or control CL-tACS (1:1 allocation) to achieve approximately 192 participants completing the primary endpoint at week 3, assuming a 10% lost to follow-up rate. Clinical assessments of depression and anxiety symptoms are performed at Screening, Baseline, Day 5, Follow-Up 1 (week 3), and Follow-Up 2 (week 5). Additional assessments of quality of life are included. For subjects who are not considered responders at the Week 3 primary endpoint, there will be a phase 2 retreatment with active CL-tACS which will mirror the same 5-day protocol. Patients in this arm will complete additional data collection at Phase 2 baseline, Phase 2 Day 5, Phase 2 Follow-up 1 (phase 2 week 3), and phase 2 follow-up 2 (phase 2 week 5).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
214
Individual alpha tACS
Sham stimulation
Qortical Clinical Partners
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Response rates (at least 50% reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score) at Week 3 Phase 1 Evaluation
Response rates (at least 50% reduction in HDRS-D17 score) (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs. Control groups.
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to Week 3
Change in mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) Score
Change in mean HDRS-17 Score (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs Control groups.
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to Week 3
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Score
Change in self-reported anxiety symptoms STAI Trait (score range is 20-80, higher is worse) in Active vs Control groups
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to week 3, Phase 1
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) Remission Rate
Remission rates (HDRS-17 score ≤ 7) (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs Control groups.
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to Week 3, Phase 1
Difference in change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) in Active vs control groups between patients with MDD and GAD and patients with MDD and not GAD
Difference in the change in mean HDRS-17 Score (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs Control groups between MDD patients with and without a comorbid GAD diagnosis.
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to Week 3
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) Remission Rate at Day 5
Remission rates (HDRS-17 score ≤ 7) (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs Control groups.
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to Day 5
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Response rates (at least 50% reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score) at Day 5
Responder rates (at least 50% reduction in HDRS-17 score) (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs Control groups.
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to Day 5
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) Score at Day 5
Change in HDRS-17 Score (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs Control groups.
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to Day 5
Difference in change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) in Active vs control groups between patients with MDD and GAD and patients with MDD and not GAD at Day 5
Difference in the change in mean HDRS-17 Score (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs Control groups between MDD patients with and without a comorbid GAD diagnosis.
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to Day 5
Remission rates (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score ≤ 7) at Week 5
Remission rates (HDRS-17 score ≤ 7) (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs Control groups.
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to Week 5
Response rates (at least 50% reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score) at Week 5
Responder rates (at least 50% reduction in HDRS-17 score) (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs Control groups.
Time frame: [Timeframe: Baseline to Week 5].
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score at Week 5
Change in HDRS-17 (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs Control groups.
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to Week 5
Difference in change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) in Active vs control groups between patients with MDD and GAD and patients with MDD and not GAD at Week 5
Difference in the change in mean HDRS-17 Score (0-52 score range, higher score is worse) in Active vs Control groups between MDD patients with and without a comorbid GAD diagnosis.
Time frame: Timeframe: Baseline to Week 5