List of the Hypothesis: Primary hypothesis: A flexible acupuncture and Chinese herbal medicine protocol will be feasible, acceptable, and useful for the treatment of long COVID. Secondary hypothesis: Long COVID patients receiving acupuncture treatment or acupuncture treatment and Chinese herbal supplements over an 8-week period will see improvements in their symptoms, function, and quality of life measurements. Specific Aims of This Research (Purpose of the study): To study the feasibility, acceptability and utility of an acupuncture and Chinese herbal supplement treatment protocol for patients with long COVID and preliminarily assess the effects of treatment. Currently Available Research on This Subject: Studies indicate that acupuncture can effectively treat symptoms that are similar to those often seen in long COVID patients. Additionally, recent studies and clinical evidence suggest that there is substantial potential for acupuncture in the treatment of long COVID. Acupuncture may be beneficial because it can address many symptoms simultaneously with a single intervention, whereas symptom clusters can be difficult to manage with pharmaceuticals due to the need for multiple pharmaceutical agents. Summary of the research protocol/methodology: Five patients will receive acupuncture treatment, and five patients will receive acupuncture and Chinese herbal medicine. Each participant will receive 16 acupuncture treatments over the course of eight weeks (i.e., twice per week). Each treatment session will last for 30 minutes. Follow-up will occur at 12 weeks (i.e., four weeks after the final treatment session). Significance of this research to the health and welfare of general public: There is currently not a single, specific treatment for long COVID. If acupuncture treatment alone and/or acupuncture and Chinese herbal medicine combined are feasible, acceptable, and efficacious in the improvement of long COVID symptoms, it will offer patients additional treatment options, which may help some patients to avoid pharmaceutical treatment side effects or polypharmacy challenges.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
10
The investigators have developed a list of core acupoints, which will be used by all clinicians for each specific TCM diagnosis pattern identified in each patient. Similarly, a list of common herbal formulas, that we will keep in stock based on the specific diagnosis patterns, has been developed. Clinicians will have the option of using additional acupoints as necessary and will be asked to record and explain any variations from the core protocol. 1. Residual Heat: LI-11, KI-6;Bai He Gu Jin Tang 2. Residual Phlegm: ST-40, Sp-9;Ban Xia Bai Zhu Tian Ma Tang,Er Chen Tang 3. Deficiency of Spleen: SP-3, ST-36;Gui Pi Tang,Xiang Sha Liu Jun Zi Tang 4. Lung Qi Deficiency with Dampness: LU-9, LU-7;Zhi Sou San,Er Chen Tang 5. Blood Stagnation: SP-10, SP-6;Xue Fu Zhu Yu Tang,Tao Hong Si Wu Tang 6. Deficiency of Lung: LU-9, LU-7; Bu Fei Tang 7. Liver Qi Stagnation: LV-3, PC-6;Xiao Yao San, Chai Hu Shu Gan Tang 8. Yin Deficiency: KI-6, SP-6;Liu Wei Di Huang Wan 9. Deficiency of Kidney: KI-3, KI-6;
SCUHS
Whittier, California, United States
RECRUITINGFeasibility of Implementing a Combined Acupuncture and Chinese Herbal Medicine Intervention for long COVID
Feasibility will be measured through a feasibility assessment questionnaire which will evaluate recruitment, retention, and adherence metrics across the 12-week intervention and the final follow-up. Feasibility indicators will be summarized as proportions and descriptive statistics to evaluate the practicality of the study procedures and protocol implementation.
Time frame: From enrollment to the final follow-up at 12 weeks
Patient-Reported Acceptability of the Study Procedures and Treatments
Acceptability will be evaluated using a participant satisfaction questionnaire administered at the end of the 12-week intervention. The survey includes Likert-scale items (1 = very dissatisfied to 5 = very satisfied) assessing participants' comfort with study procedures, satisfaction with the acupuncture and herbal treatment, and willingness to recommend participation to others. Mean scores will be calculated; higher scores indicate greater acceptability and satisfaction with the study protocol and treatment experience
Time frame: Week 12 (final follow-up).
Clinician-Reported Acceptability of the Study Protocol
Clinician acceptability will be measured through a self-administered survey at the end of the 12-week intervention. The survey uses a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 5 = very satisfied) to assess satisfaction with the clinical feasibility, workflow, and perceived patient benefit of the combined acupuncture and herbal medicine protocol. Scores will be averaged, and higher scores indicate greater clinician-reported acceptability.
Time frame: Week 12 (final follow-up).
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life Measured by PROMIS-29 v2.1
Quality of life will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29 v2.1) at baseline, mid-intervention, and post-intervention. The PROMIS-29 measures physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, and social participation. Each domain produces a standardized T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10). Higher scores represent better functioning for positive domains and greater symptom burden for negative domains. Changes from baseline to Week 12 will reflect improvements or declines in overall quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12.
Change in Symptom Burden Measured by the Symptom Burden Questionnaire for Long COVID (SBQ™-LC)
Symptom burden will be assessed using the Symptom Burden Questionnaire for Long COVID (SBQ™-LC). At baseline, participants complete all domains; at Weeks 8 and 12, they complete up to four domains corresponding to their most bothersome baseline symptoms, as well as the mandatory Mental Health and Well-Being domain. Each item is rated from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Domain and total scores will be compared across time points to evaluate changes in symptom burden.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 12.
Change in Whole Health Person Index (WHPI)
Overall well-being will be measured using the Whole Health Person Index (WHPI), a 0-100 scale that assesses physical, emotional, and social wellness. Higher scores indicate better overall health and life balance. The change in WHPI from baseline to Week 12 will be used to evaluate perceived improvements in general well-being associated with the intervention.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 12.
Change in Laboratory Biomarkers - Complete blood count
Laboratory values will be compared from baseline to Week 8 to assess physiological effects of the intervention. Test includes complete blood count (CBC) with differential. Changes in this marker will indicate biological trends in inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8.
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events Associated with Acupuncture and Herbal Medicine
Safety will be monitored throughout the 12-week study by documenting adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) related to acupuncture or herbal supplementation. Each event will be recorded in Qualtrics using the Adverse Event Form and graded as mild, moderate, or severe per Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0) guidelines. Frequency and type of AEs will be summarized descriptively as counts and percentages.
Time frame: Throughout the 12-week study period
Change in Laboratory Biomarkers - Comprehensive metabolic panel
Laboratory values will be compared from baseline to Week 8 to assess physiological effects of the intervention. Test includes complete comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP). Changes in this marker will indicate biological trends in inflammation and metabolic function.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8.
Change in Laboratory Biomarkers - C-reactive protein
Laboratory values will be compared from baseline to Week 8 to assess physiological effects of the intervention. Test includes C-reactive protein (CRP). Changes in this marker will indicate biological trends in inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8.
Change in Laboratory Biomarkers - Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Laboratory values will be compared from baseline to Week 8 to assess physiological effects of the intervention. Test includes erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Changes in this marker will indicate biological trends in inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8.
Change in Laboratory Biomarkers - Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
Laboratory values will be compared from baseline to Week 8 to assess physiological effects of the intervention. Test includes tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Changes in this marker will indicate biological trends in inflammation and metabolic function.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8.
Change in Laboratory Biomarkers - thyroid panel
Laboratory values will be compared from baseline to Week 8 to assess physiological effects of the intervention. Test includes thyroid panel. Changes in this marker will indicate biological trends in metabolic function.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8.
Change in Laboratory Biomarkers - Vitamin D levels.
Laboratory values will be compared from baseline to Week 8 to assess physiological effects of the intervention. Tests include vitamin D levels. Changes in these markers will indicate biological trends in inflammation and metabolic function.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.