This is a retrospective, fully-crossed, multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) study to evaluate the effectiveness of 'CadAI-B Dx' (CadAI-B) for decision support in breast ultrasound. The study compares the diagnostic performance of readers interpreting breast ultrasound images with and without the aid of CadAI-B. A total of 797 patient cases will be included, comprising 350 cases with a confirmed diagnosis of malignancy and 447 cases with a confirmed benign diagnosis. Sixteen readers will participate in the study to evaluate the device.
The study utilizes a crossover design where all readers independently review all cases. The control arm consists of a reading session where participating readers independently review cases without the assistance of the CadAI-B device (unaided reading). The experimental arm involves reading with CadAI-B assistance (AI-aided reading). To minimize potential bias, a washout period of four weeks will be maintained between the unassisted and assisted reading sessions for each reader. The primary hypothesis is that CadAI-B assistance significantly improves overall reader performance in breast ultrasound interpretation, as measured by the area under the Localization Receiver Operating Characteristic (LROC) curve (AULROC).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
797
CadAI-B Dx is a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) designed to assist physicians by providing Computer-Aided Detection (CADe) and Diagnosis (CADx) capabilities in breast ultrasound interpretation. The software automatically processes the image to identify suspicious regions (Lesion Detection) and provides a quantitative malignancy score (CadAI-Score) mapped to a corresponding BI-RADS Category. It also analyzes lesion size and BI-RADS lexicon descriptors.
Yonsei University Severance Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Area Under the Localization Receiver Operating Characteristic (LROC) Curve (AULROC)
The difference in reader performance between the unaided and AI-aided sessions in breast ultrasound interpretation. LROC reflects both detection accuracy and localization precision. The primary hypothesis is that the mean AULROC of all readers for the AI-aided reading mode is greater than that for the unaided reading mode.
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Sensitivity
Comparison of the average sensitivity of the readers between the unaided and AI-aided sessions.
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
Comparison of PPV between unaided and AI-aided sessions. The PPV will be adjusted for disease prevalence in the target population to reflect real-world clinical practice.
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
Comparison of NPV between unaided and AI-aided sessions. The NPV will be adjusted for disease prevalence in the target population.
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Inter-reader Agreement
Evaluation of the consistency of interpretations among different readers. Inter-reader agreement for BI-RADS category and descriptors assignments will be compared between sessions using Kappa statistics.
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Reading Time
Comparison of the average reading time per case between the unaided and AI-aided sessions to assess if the AI system improves the efficiency of interpretation.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
AI-Ground Truth Agreement
Assessment of the agreement between the AI system's outputs and the ground truth. This includes agreement on BI-RADS categories and descriptors (using Kappa statistics) and lesion size measurements (using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient).
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 2 months